SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Rebuild

Créé par: Salzy
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 23 févr. 2020
Publié: 23 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trying to best weaponize our cap space, which is the Ducks most valuable deadline asset. With the top end offense at the top of the draft trying to build our RD should take priority at the deadline so we can take the best available forward on draft day

Next Season Depth Chart (Without 2020 draft picks or FA)
Jones - Getzlaf - Rakell
Comtois - Steel - Silf
Ritchie - Henrique - Terry
Deslauriers - Backes - Comeau

Lindholm - J.Honka
Fowler - Gudbranson
Mahura - Hakanpaa

Gibson
Stolarz
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Honka, Anttoni [Liste de réserve]
  2. Kuokkanen, Janne
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Not sure of his availability but I think Honka would be a more realistic target than Suzuki
CAR
  1. Del Zotto, Michael
  2. Manson, Josh
  3. Miller, Ryan (562 500 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Lets assume Miller waives for the sake of argument
2.
ANA
    Add a cap dump from CAR, Just wasnt sure who
    CAR
    3.
    ANA
    1. Comeau, Blake
    2. Honka, Julius [Liste de réserve]
    4.
    ANA
    1. Ceci, Cody
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
    3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
    TOR
    1. Rowney, Carter (566 666 $ retained)
    5.
    ANA
      Assuming Ceci will come off LTIR this season, not sure how serious his injury is
      TOR
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      2021
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de ANA
      2022
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2181 500 000 $62 609 590 $0 $982 500 $18 890 410 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      863 333 $863 333 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
      AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
      AG, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
      AG, C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      863 333 $863 333 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      950 000 $950 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      C, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Stars de Dallas
      2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
      DG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
      G
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      850 000 $850 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      750 000 $750 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      894 166 $894 166 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      700 000 $700 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
      C, AD
      NMC
      UFA - 3

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      23 févr. 2020 à 18 h 52
      #1
      Being wrong is ok
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 703
      Mentions "j'aime": 354
      As a ducks fan and lets say for sake of argument worked with you being the GM I would advise against every trade strongly. Like I'm glad this is fake.
      23 févr. 2020 à 19 h 24
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 5,139
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,943
      Quoting: Slezzy21
      As a ducks fan and lets say for sake of argument worked with you being the GM I would advise against every trade strongly. Like I'm glad this is fake.


      Guess we disagree, CAR deal adds a highly regarded RD prospect a good B prospect and a first

      DAL deal adds a decent option at RD for a guy that fetches a 4th best case scenario

      TOR deal is questionable sure but Rowney would probably get a 5 or 6th on his own

      A first round pick in this draft and adding some good young RD options along with a decent forward prospect really at just the cost Manson and some low tier rentals, I would be ecstatic with this deadline
      AGKH123 a aimé ceci.
      23 févr. 2020 à 19 h 43
      #3
      Being wrong is ok
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 703
      Mentions "j'aime": 354
      @salzy first of Gotta apologize I just have seen to many stupid Manson trades. But I see your point of view and respect it. I personally need a 2nd round for grant because I rather keep him and Honka is probably not gonna pan out. For the other trade I just see it being an underpayment for Manson. I know that sounds a little silly but his presence is so valuable in the playoffs. Plus he's got the term and a great cap hit. Not to mention, the pick is conditional and I don't like the prospects we can get back. To add onto that I don't think its good to take on another cap dump. Then I just completely disagree with the retention on Rowney and getting Cody Ceci despite the picks we receive with him.
      23 févr. 2020 à 19 h 52
      #4
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 5,139
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,943
      Quoting: Slezzy21
      @salzy first of Gotta apologize I just have seen to many stupid Manson trades. But I see your point of view and respect it. I personally need a 2nd round for grant because I rather keep him and Honka is probably not gonna pan out. For the other trade I just see it being an underpayment for Manson. I know that sounds a little silly but his presence is so valuable in the playoffs. Plus he's got the term and a great cap hit. Not to mention, the pick is conditional and I don't like the prospects we can get back. To add onto that I don't think its good to take on another cap dump. Then I just completely disagree with the retention on Rowney and getting Cody Ceci despite the pick we receive with him.


      I broke down the CAR trade like this in my mind
      Manson = Honka + 1st
      Miller DZ = JK (I see miller being valued at a 4th/5th without retention and DZ being a 6th/7th)

      There is no team that will give a second for Grant, and holding on to him for nothing is poor asset management, we can trade him and sign him in the offseason if we want to keep him that bad

      Worrying about someones playoff presence with the team in the situation we are in is also mismanagement, I love Manson and would hate to see him go but getting a really good RD prospect and a mid 1st would be a great return for him, he isn't the same player he was a few seasons ago

      His contract adds to his value and BM should take advantage of that and not hold on for the sake of it especially if CAR gets desperate

      Taking on minor cap dumps would be fine (Under 3M cap hits for a year) we aren't competing next season so we might as well use a valuable asset in our cap space

      a 4th and a 5th for Rowney would be a good return for him, and taking Ceci to play RD for 20 games doesn't affect us at all

      This team is 2 seasons away from competing best case, that leaves one year of Manson who may regress further by that time, His value won't be higher than it is now and that should be capitalized on
      AGKH123 a aimé ceci.
      23 févr. 2020 à 20 h 27
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 1,457
      Mentions "j'aime": 462
      I like the fact you've taken a completely different approach to address our issues. Despite being a big believer in keeping Manson, I actually quite like the trade you've put together, especially considering that TOR a risk for not actually making the playoffs. I think the value is absolutely there. I just wouldn't personally do that deal because I don't like that RS without Manson. I am not on the Julius Honka hype train at all and certainly would never even consider playing him top pairing. Would rather just get a 2nd or 3rd for Grant. I don't understand why some fans want him signed. He's a neat player, but nothing special and totally movable. If we keep him, he only gains further leverage to demand a stupid contract after the good year he's had. No thanks. Don't understand moving Rowney. He's been good us and all we're returning is a few late round picks. Not worth it to me considering we'd probably spend more trading for a replacement or overpay on someone at UFA.
      Salzy et AGKH123 a aimé ceci.
      23 févr. 2020 à 20 h 35
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: nov. 2018
      Messages: 5,139
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,943
      Quoting: mytduxfan
      I like the fact you've taken a completely different approach to address our issues. Despite being a big believer in keeping Manson, I actually quite like the trade you've put together, especially considering that TOR a risk for not actually making the playoffs. I think the value is absolutely there. I just wouldn't personally do that deal because I don't like that RS without Manson. I am not on the Julius Honka hype train at all and certainly would never even consider playing him top pairing. Would rather just get a 2nd or 3rd for Grant. I don't understand why some fans want him signed. He's a neat player, but nothing special and totally movable. If we keep him, he only gains further leverage to demand a stupid contract after the good year he's had. No thanks. Don't understand moving Rowney. He's been good us and all we're returning is a few late round picks. Not worth it to me considering we'd probably spend more trading for a replacement or overpay on someone at UFA.


      Im on the same boat with Manson, Hate to see him go but if we can get a package like this for him I'd pull the trigger, and depending on the Pesce injury this may be a possibility

      J. Honka may not be the ideal option but if we can get a player like that for Grant, who is a 4th liner and nothing more I'd take a flier on Honka, to be fair though I've always been a big fan of his

      I don't see us getting more than a 4th for Grant tbh, I would love to get more but I was trying to be more realisitic with my returns and not absolute best case scenario, He should 100% get moved for the best offer tomorrow regardless what it is

      Yeah the more I look at the Rowney deal the more I even question it, I think I was just having fun making trades, I figured his role could be filled by the combo of Backes/Comeau though
      mytduxfan et AGKH123 a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage