SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sell the farm - Goodrow to New York - Trio to Avs

Créé par: yikes
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 21 févr. 2020
Publié: 21 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Karlsson, Melker (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Marleau, Patrick
  3. Thornton, Joe (1 000 000 $ retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Backes, David
  2. Forsbacka Karlsson, Jakob [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
3.
SJS
  1. Ho-Sang, Joshua
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
4.
SJS
  1. Gagner, Sam
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Gambrell, Dylan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
5.
SJS
  1. Andersson, Lias
  2. Gauthier, Julien
Détails additionnels:
*Conditional 2020 third if Andersson does not participate in atleast 10/20 remaining games of the season (unless due to injury).*
6.
SJS
    *If the Avs do not make the WCF the Sharks send a 2020 3rd*
    COL
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $68 339 040 $660 750 $1 447 500 $13 160 960 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    874 125 $874 125 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
    C, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    675 000 $675 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    735 000 $735 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    853 333 $853 333 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 835 000 $2 835 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    960 000 $960 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    21 févr. 2020 à 10 h 31
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 1,127
    Mentions "j'aime": 448
    You're going to take the Backes contract and not get a first back? Why do you want Ho-Sang?
    21 févr. 2020 à 10 h 33
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 1,464
    Mentions "j'aime": 147
    Goodrow isn’t a bad player, but I don’t think JG just got Gauthier to flip him for a 3/4 liner. I truly think that there’s potential of him being that front net presence CK has been IF he is traded, and if he’s not traded, it’s very good to have a few of those big bodied players who can score close to the net. Wouldn’t trade him right now unless it’s a piece with AG to get a LeBanc type who’s a definite top 6 F.still would really consider that since he can be a very important piece of the future especially on his ELC.
    yikes a aimé ceci.
    21 févr. 2020 à 10 h 42
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2017
    Messages: 1,848
    Mentions "j'aime": 756
    the Ranger's trade does not make sense. no reason to move either of those guys for a bottom 6 guy.
    21 févr. 2020 à 10 h 51
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    I think Bowers is too much here, 3 rentals for one of their prospects is a steep price.
    I would image they would do a lesser prospect and another draft pick instead of Bowers
    yikes a aimé ceci.
    21 févr. 2020 à 10 h 57
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,057
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
    Quoting: Mike_Gartner
    the Ranger's trade does not make sense. no reason to move either of those guys for a bottom 6 guy.

    middle 6!
    21 févr. 2020 à 10 h 58
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,057
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
    Quoting: Scoob1978
    You're going to take the Backes contract and not get a first back? Why do you want Ho-Sang?

    Idk why not

    And every bruins fans cries when they see anything higher then a second and whatever prospect moved with backes so I just leave it as is but know there would be a major difference to a backes trade irl
    21 févr. 2020 à 10 h 59
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,057
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
    Quoting: coga16
    I think Bowers is too much here, 3 rentals for one of their prospects is a steep price.
    I would image they would do a lesser prospect and another draft pick instead of Bowers



    Would Sampo ranta be considered less?

    I would do it still if it was ranta
    21 févr. 2020 à 11 h 2
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: yikes
    Would Sampo ranta be considered less?

    I would do it still if it was ranta


    He is a lesser prospect, an interesting one but something Avs would include in a trade. Nick Henry is the guy I was thinking of bc they are all pure rentals, and it doesnt seem like Sakic wasnt to move any prospects for rentals, he would if there is some term on the deal.

    Goodrow for example
    21 févr. 2020 à 11 h 9
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,057
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
    Quoting: coga16
    He is a lesser prospect, an interesting one but something Avs would include in a trade. Nick Henry is the guy I was thinking of bc they are all pure rentals, and it doesnt seem like Sakic wasnt to move any prospects for rentals, he would if there is some term on the deal.

    Goodrow for example


    I can see that happening; Goodrow would look great as a middle 6 grinder winger or be a center for your bottom 6/ 3rd line (still can be a winger if needed obv).

    I would say....

    Bowers, Conditional Pick - Goodrow
    Sampo, Kamenev???? - Goodrow
    First - Goodrow
    Annunen - Goodrow
    Beaucage (I have him over bowers?) - Goodrow

    Just quick first thoughts on potentials
    21 févr. 2020 à 12 h 47
    #10
    train, train
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 2,996
    Mentions "j'aime": 730
    Quoting: Philu916
    Goodrow isn’t a bad player


    electricity wasn't a bad invention
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage