SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Gaudreau for Labanc 2020 1st and Burns with retention

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 20 févr. 2020
Publié: 20 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
21 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
23 750 000 $
46 000 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
11 000 000 $
22 800 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Sawchenko, Zach
3800 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
2.
SJS
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
CGY
  1. Burns, Brent (1 600 000 $ retained)
  2. Labanc, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (COL)
COL
    Aaron Dell at 201/20 TDL
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de PHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de WSH
    2021
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 000 000 $77 863 333 $0 $512 500 $5 136 667 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 4
    2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Sawchenko, Zach
    800 000 $800 000 $
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    20 févr. 2020 à 15 h 9
    #1
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 28
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    After the debacle of a season that was, I don’t think the Sharks would want to look at continuing to try to win. I think they’ll take a step back next year.
    20 févr. 2020 à 15 h 11
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    train, train
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 2,996
    Mentions "j'aime": 730
    Quoting: PeterDumvass
    After the debacle of a season that was, I don’t think the Sharks would want to look at continuing to try to win. I think they’ll take a step back next year.


    Doug Wilson after the Dillon said he fully expects this team to come back next year and make a cup run and will make moves towards helping make that happen.
    20 févr. 2020 à 15 h 12
    #3
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 28
    Mentions "j'aime": 2
    Quoting: CheechYou
    Doug Wilson after the Dillon said he fully expects this team to come back next year and make a cup run and will make moves towards helping make that happen.


    What if it all fails? Who’s to blame? Burns is 34 and could be on the verge of decline to the point where he’s not even worth his contract, EVEN with retained salary.
    20 févr. 2020 à 15 h 30
    #4
    GloryDaysAreBack
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 1,095
    Mentions "j'aime": 469
    As much as that Dell trade is exactly what Sakic is likely looking for. I am not sure he wants to give up a 2nd for goaltender depth. If that's the price I doubt he accepts.

    A Gio-Burns maybe the best old man pairing but it kind cuts the flames cup window which is iffy at best right now. Personally I think the flames could do better trading Gaudreau and mostly because they don't have to take on the cap hell that will be Burns' last few years on that contract. I like Labanc and a 1st but I think they'd rather similar value in just one better player than Labanc if that makes sense.
    20 févr. 2020 à 16 h 0
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 19,535
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,690
    Quoting: CheechYou
    Doug Wilson after the Dillon said he fully expects this team to come back next year and make a cup run and will make moves towards helping make that happen.


    I think losing Burns and Labanc while gaining Gaudreau, in the short term at least, isn't much of an upgrade then. Most teams trying to compete for a cup tend to not want to lose current players off their roster because overall the team doesn't get significantly better.

    They'd be better off just trading the 1st and maybe Labanc for an upgrade at a position of need.
    20 févr. 2020 à 16 h 35
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    train, train
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 2,996
    Mentions "j'aime": 730
    Quoting: F50marco
    I think losing Burns and Labanc while gaining Gaudreau, in the short term at least, isn't much of an upgrade then. Most teams trying to compete for a cup tend to not want to lose current players off their roster because overall the team doesn't get significantly better.

    They'd be better off just trading the 1st and maybe Labanc for an upgrade at a position of need.


    I think what you're saying makes perfect sense but it all depends on what Wilson would be able to gain in FA in this hypothetical scenario. If Labanc+Burns are gone and only Gaudreau come back then it's (probably) a net loss in the immediate sense (definitely a gain for the future). But the immediate cap space that would be freed up (since Labanc would get a raise too) could land SJ a guy like Toffoli, in addition to Greiss, Braun, and Fast, then I think it's a net gain.

    Say Labanc nets 4mil and Burns stays at 8mil (12mil total). Replacing that with Gaudreau saves 5mil (12-6.75), and if there's a 1.6mil retention for Burns, frees up 3.4mil. If the Sharks are able to add that cap to be able to afford a guy like Toffoli, it's a win. If not, maybe that can really strengthen their depth at least by netting Fast + Pageau + Greiss.
    F50marco a aimé ceci.
    20 févr. 2020 à 16 h 40
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    train, train
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 2,996
    Mentions "j'aime": 730
    Quoting: BlastnyFromThePastny
    As much as that Dell trade is exactly what Sakic is likely looking for. I am not sure he wants to give up a 2nd for goaltender depth. If that's the price I doubt he accepts.


    Hopefully SJ nets a 2nd here but I'd be okay with a 3rd -- as long as SJ gets some asset since they really need them. I think it's a trade waiting to happen in the next few days.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage