SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rakell and Buffer

Créé par: FireBotts
Équipe: 2019-20 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 20 févr. 2020
Publié: 20 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
3.
BOS
  1. Byfuglien, Dustin (3 800 000 $ retained)
WPG
  1. Clifton, Connor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
- If Byfuglien doesn’t play In 80% of playoff games the Pick is downgrades to a 3rd.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de CAR
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $72 507 306 $0 $2 470 000 $8 992 694 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 févr. 2020 à 1 h 56
#1
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,461
Mentions "j'aime": 8,213
Hows buff playing this year, is that a good trade?
20 févr. 2020 à 6 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
That’s an awful deal for ANA. Zucker got more and Rakell is better. EZ pass.
20 févr. 2020 à 7 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,259
Mentions "j'aime": 140
I believe Boston has a “no drama” philosophy when it comes to the type of players it accepts on its team. And trades away those that don’t fit that type. My theory. Ex: Hamilton, Seguin, Kessel.

I can’t see them wanting Buff.
Chopper02 a aimé ceci.
20 févr. 2020 à 7 h 52
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Modifié 20 févr. 2020 à 8 h 14
Quoting: mytduxfan
That’s an awful deal for ANA. Zucker got more and Rakell is better. EZ pass.


How did Zucker get more? Jesus.

1st - 1st. Push. Right now those picks would be 31 and 29. No difference.

Addisson - Anderson. Slight edge Addisson. Both puck moving RD drafted in 2nd round. Addisson a year older and closer to NHL ready which is why i give him an edge.

Chuky - Heinen - adv Heinen, chuky is more a cap dump and a UFA to be that they are already looking to flip to get rid of. Heinen actually has value.

That leaves Frederic still, a 1st round value that covers Backes.

Rakell has been pretty much the same as Zucker the last 3 years. Both with a 30 goal season that inflates their perception despite not living up to it since. Rakell has a better contract.

You personally don’t want to trade him, fine. Ducks don’t either. But the value in the offer is fair. And saying it’s less than Zucker return is pretty ignorant.
20 févr. 2020 à 8 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Gofnut999
How did Zucker get more? Jesus.

1st - 1st. Push. Right now those picks would be 31 and 29. No difference.

Addisson - Anderson. Slight edge Addisson. Both puck moving RD drafted in 2nd round. Addisson a year older and closer to NHL ready which is why i give him an edge.

Chuky - Heinen - adv Heinen, chuky is more a cap dump and a UFA to be that they are already looking to flip to get rid of. Heinen actually has value.

That leaves Frederic still, a 1st round value that covers Backes.

Rakell has been pretty much the same as Zucker the last 3 years. Both with a 30 goal season that inflates their perception despite not living up to it since. Rakell has a better contract.

You personally don’t want to trade him, fine. Ducks don’t either. But the value in the offer is fair. And saying it’s less than Zucker return is pretty ignorant.


Back take IMO.

Addison >> Anderson - Addison is a considerably better prospect. Both are puck moving D-men, but Addison is producing considerably more points in a league where it is harder to score. Addison is actually younger than Anderson (by 2 months), so not sure what you're talking about there. Addison also made it onto a powerhouse WJC team, whereas Anderson didn't. They're really not comparable prospects. Take your yellow and black tinted glasses off please.

Chuky >> Heinen - Chucky is slightly overpaid and had a down year in PIT, but he's a far more proven scorer than Heinen. Both mid-20s, so no major difference there. I don't think MIN or PIT view him as a pure cap dump. A guy who consistently puts up around 20 goals and 40-50 points per year is never going to be one. Backes is a pure cap dump. I'll give you that Chucky is a pending UFA vs. Heinen, who still has RFA status. However, I have no idea how you're giving Heinen the adv in terms of on-ice performance. Yeah, Chucky is having a down year, but you don't trade players in their mid-20s having down years and completely ignore their previous 6 good years in the NHL and across multiple teams... well, unless you have an agenda that is.

Frederic is a late, late 1st round pick. Not a bad addition, but nothing special for me. He hasn't even been performing that well in the AHL. Likely won't amount to much. Would rather have the 1st round pick, which could be higher than 29th OA depending on how BOS do in the playoffs. Moreover, this years draft is deep.

So it's lesser prospect (Anderson vs. Addison) + lesser roster player (Heinen vs. Chuky) + prospect we don't really need (Frederic vs. 1st). The Backes cap dump is going to cost you a 1st, so we can leave that out. Yeah, not interested. Rakell is younger, on a better contract, has a better track record than Zucker. So I'm not sure why we'd accept this deal. Tbh, I don't think BOS has the assets to acquire Rakell. Probably better off targeting Kase. However, given the low-ball offers I've seen BOS fans over on him, I doubt that happens either.

I'd gladly move Rakell for the right deal. EDM seems like a great trade partner and they have some high-end RHD prospects + picks that we'd be interested in.
20 févr. 2020 à 9 h 14
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: mytduxfan
Back take IMO.

Addison >> Anderson - Addison is a considerably better prospect. Both are puck moving D-men, but Addison is producing considerably more points in a league where it is harder to score. Addison is actually younger than Anderson (by 2 months), so not sure what you're talking about there. Addison also made it onto a powerhouse WJC team, whereas Anderson didn't. They're really not comparable prospects. Take your yellow and black tinted glasses off please.

Chuky >> Heinen - Chucky is slightly overpaid and had a down year in PIT, but he's a far more proven scorer than Heinen. Both mid-20s, so no major difference there. I don't think MIN or PIT view him as a pure cap dump. A guy who consistently puts up around 20 goals and 40-50 points per year is never going to be one. Backes is a pure cap dump. I'll give you that Chucky is a pending UFA vs. Heinen, who still has RFA status. However, I have no idea how you're giving Heinen the adv in terms of on-ice performance. Yeah, Chucky is having a down year, but you don't trade players in their mid-20s having down years and completely ignore their previous 6 good years in the NHL and across multiple teams... well, unless you have an agenda that is.

Frederic is a late, late 1st round pick. Not a bad addition, but nothing special for me. He hasn't even been performing that well in the AHL. Likely won't amount to much. Would rather have the 1st round pick, which could be higher than 29th OA depending on how BOS do in the playoffs. Moreover, this years draft is deep.

So it's lesser prospect (Anderson vs. Addison) + lesser roster player (Heinen vs. Chuky) + prospect we don't really need (Frederic vs. 1st). The Backes cap dump is going to cost you a 1st, so we can leave that out. Yeah, not interested. Rakell is younger, on a better contract, has a better track record than Zucker. So I'm not sure why we'd accept this deal. Tbh, I don't think BOS has the assets to acquire Rakell. Probably better off targeting Kase. However, given the low-ball offers I've seen BOS fans over on him, I doubt that happens either.

I'd gladly move Rakell for the right deal. EDM seems like a great trade partner and they have some high-end RHD prospects + picks that we'd be interested in.



I stand corrected on Axel age. I keep forgetting he spent a year in Europe after being drafted. Thank you.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
20 févr. 2020 à 9 h 16
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: mytduxfan
That’s an awful deal for ANA. Zucker got more and Rakell is better. EZ pass.


Zucker got less. Zucker got way way less. EZ wrong.
20 févr. 2020 à 9 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Zucker got less. Zucker got way way less. EZ wrong.


Nope. See above post to Gofnut999 for my argument that this is considerably less than what Zucker got.
20 févr. 2020 à 10 h 19
#9
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: mytduxfan
Nope. See above post to Gofnut999 for my argument that this is considerably less than what Zucker got.


I can’t see any of gofnut’s posts. I blocked him. I just think he has a very thin grasp on how hockey is played and just hammers the same incorrect point over and over again. It’s nauseating, so i don’t deal with it.

Zucker got less. Without question. Galchenyuk is a cap dump. The premise that he has more value than heinen is preposterous. They’re paying him for the rest of the year and then he’ll head to Russia. Heinen will still be here, and will still be an RFA at the end of his deal.
20 févr. 2020 à 11 h 18
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I can’t see any of gofnut’s posts. I blocked him. I just think he has a very thin grasp on how hockey is played and just hammers the same incorrect point over and over again. It’s nauseating, so i don’t deal with it.


My response to Gofnut999.

Addison >> Anderson - Addison is a considerably better prospect. Both are puck moving D-men, but Addison is producing considerably more points in a league where it is harder to score. Addison is actually younger than Anderson (by 2 months), so not sure what you're talking about there. Addison also made it onto a powerhouse WJC team, whereas Anderson didn't. They're really not comparable prospects. Take your yellow and black tinted glasses off please.

Chuky >> Heinen - Chucky is slightly overpaid and had a down year in PIT, but he's a far more proven scorer than Heinen. Both mid-20s, so no major difference there. I don't think MIN or PIT view him as a pure cap dump. A guy who consistently puts up around 20 goals and 40-50 points per year is never going to be one. Backes is a pure cap dump. I'll give you that Chucky is a pending UFA vs. Heinen, who still has RFA status. However, I have no idea how you're giving Heinen the adv in terms of on-ice performance. Yeah, Chucky is having a down year, but you don't trade players in their mid-20s having down years and completely ignore their previous 6 good years in the NHL and across multiple teams... well, unless you have an agenda that is.

Frederic is a late, late 1st round pick. Not a bad addition, but nothing special for me. He hasn't even been performing that well in the AHL. Likely won't amount to much. Would rather have the 1st round pick, which could be higher than 29th OA depending on how BOS do in the playoffs. Moreover, this years draft is deep.

So it's lesser prospect (Anderson vs. Addison) + lesser roster player (Heinen vs. Chuky) + prospect we don't really need (Frederic vs. 1st). The Backes cap dump is going to cost you a 1st, so we can leave that out. Yeah, not interested. Rakell is younger, on a better contract, has a better track record than Zucker. So I'm not sure why we'd accept this deal. Tbh, I don't think BOS has the assets to acquire Rakell. Probably better off targeting Kase. However, given the low-ball offers I've seen BOS fans over on him, I doubt that happens either.

I'd gladly move Rakell for the right deal. EDM seems like a great trade partner and they have some high-end RHD prospects + picks that we'd be interested in.

Quoting: Bcarlo25
Zucker got less. Without question. Galchenyuk is a cap dump. The premise that he has more value than heinen is preposterous. They’re paying him for the rest of the year and then he’ll head to Russia. Heinen will still be here, and will still be an RFA at the end of his deal.


Backes is a cap dump. Galchenyuk scored 19 goals 40 pts last season. He's had a down year, apparently due to lack of chemistry with PIT players. He's not even close to being a cap dump. You can't just ignore his 6 good NHL seasons and focus on his one bad year. He didn't become the elite 1C MTL fans wanted, but he's still a good better and certainly better than Heinen (Heinen's cheaper and under control for longer, but Chucky is a better on-ice producer).

You have a source on that claim that Chucky is planning to jump ship to Russia?
20 févr. 2020 à 11 h 57
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: mytduxfan
My response to Gofnut999.

Addison >> Anderson - Addison is a considerably better prospect. Both are puck moving D-men, but Addison is producing considerably more points in a league where it is harder to score. Addison is actually younger than Anderson (by 2 months), so not sure what you're talking about there. Addison also made it onto a powerhouse WJC team, whereas Anderson didn't. They're really not comparable prospects. Take your yellow and black tinted glasses off please.

Chuky >> Heinen - Chucky is slightly overpaid and had a down year in PIT, but he's a far more proven scorer than Heinen. Both mid-20s, so no major difference there. I don't think MIN or PIT view him as a pure cap dump. A guy who consistently puts up around 20 goals and 40-50 points per year is never going to be one. Backes is a pure cap dump. I'll give you that Chucky is a pending UFA vs. Heinen, who still has RFA status. However, I have no idea how you're giving Heinen the adv in terms of on-ice performance. Yeah, Chucky is having a down year, but you don't trade players in their mid-20s having down years and completely ignore their previous 6 good years in the NHL and across multiple teams... well, unless you have an agenda that is.

Frederic is a late, late 1st round pick. Not a bad addition, but nothing special for me. He hasn't even been performing that well in the AHL. Likely won't amount to much. Would rather have the 1st round pick, which could be higher than 29th OA depending on how BOS do in the playoffs. Moreover, this years draft is deep.

So it's lesser prospect (Anderson vs. Addison) + lesser roster player (Heinen vs. Chuky) + prospect we don't really need (Frederic vs. 1st). The Backes cap dump is going to cost you a 1st, so we can leave that out. Yeah, not interested. Rakell is younger, on a better contract, has a better track record than Zucker. So I'm not sure why we'd accept this deal. Tbh, I don't think BOS has the assets to acquire Rakell. Probably better off targeting Kase. However, given the low-ball offers I've seen BOS fans over on him, I doubt that happens either.

I'd gladly move Rakell for the right deal. EDM seems like a great trade partner and they have some high-end RHD prospects + picks that we'd be interested in.



Backes is a cap dump. Galchenyuk scored 19 goals 40 pts last season. He's had a down year, apparently due to lack of chemistry with PIT players. He's not even close to being a cap dump. You can't just ignore his 6 good NHL seasons and focus on his one bad year. He didn't become the elite 1C MTL fans wanted, but he's still a good better and certainly better than Heinen (Heinen's cheaper and under control for longer, but Chucky is a better on-ice producer).

You have a source on that claim that Chucky is planning to jump ship to Russia?


It’s obvious. He’s a top six style player, can’t really play a grinding game. He doesn’t have enough talent to be top six in the NHL. He’ll be in Russia next year. Heinen is an investment in a teams future, as he can play and develop with a team for a long time. It is very clear to me that Galchenyuk was a negative value asset. I’m sure Minnesota would prefer not to have him than have him. He’s a cap dump.

Zucker was traded for a first, a good prospect, and a cap dump.

Backes is definitely a bigger cap dump than Galchenyuk, so it costs more to take him. So, on one side of the equation, it’s Rakell, and taking a cap dump in backes, which is clearly greater value than Zucker and taking a smaller cap dump in Galchenyuk. Not by a ton though. So, Pitt 1st, Addison vs Boston 1st, Frederic, Heinen, Andersson. That’s not even a comparison. The boston package is worth more.
20 févr. 2020 à 17 h 16
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Bcarlo25
It’s obvious. He’s a top six style player, can’t really play a grinding game. He doesn’t have enough talent to be top six in the NHL. He’ll be in Russia next year. Heinen is an investment in a teams future, as he can play and develop with a team for a long time. It is very clear to me that Galchenyuk was a negative value asset. I’m sure Minnesota would prefer not to have him than have him. He’s a cap dump.


Are we talking about the same player? Chuky's had back-to-back 19 goal seasons from 2017-2019. He's consistently produced 40-50 pts his whole career. At the very least, he's a top 6 winger. In fact, his 1 bad season his whole career was this year, which, as I've been told my PIT fans, was due to lack of chemistry with the team. 1 bad season for a guy in his mid-20s who had a 19 goals - 41 pt season as recently as last year doesn't automatically make you a cap dump. Not to mention his cap hit and actual salary is just $4.9M and that contract expires at the end of the season. Not exactly the same situation as Backes or Marleau, too ageing players that are well past their prime years and taking up $6M in cap hit for 10 goals and 20 points.

At worst, Chucky was in need of a "change of scenery", not a cap dump.

Quoting: Bcarlo25
Zucker was traded for a first, a good prospect, and a cap dump.

Backes is definitely a bigger cap dump than Galchenyuk, so it costs more to take him. So, on one side of the equation, it’s Rakell, and taking a cap dump in backes, which is clearly greater value than Zucker and taking a smaller cap dump in Galchenyuk. Not by a ton though. So, Pitt 1st, Addison vs Boston 1st, Frederic, Heinen, Andersson. That’s not even a comparison. The boston package is worth more.


This all sounds like you just want Chucky to be a cap dump so you can justify the low-ball offer on Rakell above. Chuky's not a cap dump. How can a fit and healthy, contributing player still in his prime years and pretty much earning his contract (aside from this season) be a cap dump? Did he work in PIT? No! Were PIT keen to move him? Yes! Does a lack of fit at one club mean he'll never be good again at another? Absolutely not. Chucky's already had success at multiple clubs.

FWIW, PIT fans and ANA fans discussed a similar deal that Zucker got, but for Rakell. Ultimately, most PIT fans didn't want to move Addison and he was kind of a requirement for us. However, no one was complaining about adding Chucky in ANA. In any event, you believe what you want to believe. I wouldn't accept the offer above Rakell.
20 févr. 2020 à 17 h 28
#13
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: mytduxfan
Are we talking about the same player? Chuky's had back-to-back 19 goal seasons from 2017-2019. He's consistently produced 40-50 pts his whole career. At the very least, he's a top 6 winger. In fact, his 1 bad season his whole career was this year, which, as I've been told my PIT fans, was due to lack of chemistry with the team. 1 bad season for a guy in his mid-20s who had a 19 goals - 41 pt season as recently as last year doesn't automatically make you a cap dump. Not to mention his cap hit and actual salary is just $4.9M and that contract expires at the end of the season. Not exactly the same situation as Backes or Marleau, too ageing players that are well past their prime years and taking up $6M in cap hit for 10 goals and 20 points.

At worst, Chucky was in need of a "change of scenery", not a cap dump.



This all sounds like you just want Chucky to be a cap dump so you can justify the low-ball offer on Rakell above. Chuky's not a cap dump. How can a fit and healthy, contributing player still in his prime years and pretty much earning his contract (aside from this season) be a cap dump? Did he work in PIT? No! Were PIT keen to move him? Yes! Does a lack of fit at one club mean he'll never be good again at another? Absolutely not. Chucky's already had success at multiple clubs.

FWIW, PIT fans and ANA fans discussed a similar deal that Zucker got, but for Rakell. Ultimately, most PIT fans didn't want to move Addison and he was kind of a requirement for us. However, no one was complaining about adding Chucky in ANA. In any event, you believe what you want to believe. I wouldn't accept the offer above Rakell.


Bottom line is it’s fine to say that you wouldn’t accept the offer, but it’s just wrong to say that it’s a lesser offer to the one that got zucker. I guess everything is subjective here, but it’s kind of like looking at a VW and a Lamborghini and saying the VW is the better ride (before you go crazy, that’s intentionally hyperbolic. I do not think that this boston offer is the Lamborghini of offers).

Are you related to Galchenyuk or something? He’s declining. It’s obvious. This is his fourth team in like 18 months. I guess you could make the argument that maybe a change of scenery could resurrect his career? So far, he’s been an unsuccessful top 6 forward with the exception of one year. He’s just failing in this league. Minnesota can’t want him. Either he stinks, and they ditch him, or he has this magical bounce back you’re referring to and he’s going to cost them in UFA. There’s just no logical way that it’s anything but a cap dump.
20 févr. 2020 à 19 h 14
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Bottom line is it’s fine to say that you wouldn’t accept the offer, but it’s just wrong to say that it’s a lesser offer to the one that got zucker. I guess everything is subjective here, but it’s kind of like looking at a VW and a Lamborghini and saying the VW is the better ride (before you go crazy, that’s intentionally hyperbolic. I do not think that this boston offer is the Lamborghini of offers).

Are you related to Galchenyuk or something? He’s declining. It’s obvious. This is his fourth team in like 18 months. I guess you could make the argument that maybe a change of scenery could resurrect his career? So far, he’s been an unsuccessful top 6 forward with the exception of one year. He’s just failing in this league. Minnesota can’t want him. Either he stinks, and they ditch him, or he has this magical bounce back you’re referring to and he’s going to cost them in UFA. There’s just no logical way that it’s anything but a cap dump.


Literally a consistent 40-50 pt scorer the past 5 years prior to this one. One bad season doesn't means he's "declining". Stop being so ridiculous. Have you even looked at his statistics? (https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/74611/alex-galchenyuk) LMFAO!!! What does the number of teams he's played on have to do with it? You're so clutching at straws to make an argument. It's painfully obvious! He's been dealt as a significant piece in multiple hockey trades for better players e.g. Max Domi, Phil Kessel, now Zucker. He's never been moved as a cap dump. Wtf are you on about at this point? Be a man. Admit you're wrong and move on.

The OPs offer is less than what Zucker got. That's my view. Get over it kid!
20 févr. 2020 à 19 h 20
#15
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: mytduxfan
Literally a consistent 40-50 pt scorer the past 5 years prior to this one. One bad season doesn't means he's "declining". Stop being so ridiculous. Have you even looked at his statistics? (https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/74611/alex-galchenyuk) LMFAO!!! What does the number of teams he's played on have to do with it? You're so clutching at straws to make an argument. It's painfully obvious! He's been dealt as a significant piece in multiple hockey trades for better players e.g. Max Domi, Phil Kessel, now Zucker. He's never been moved as a cap dump. Wtf are you on about at this point? Be a man. Admit you're wrong and move on.

The OPs offer is less than what Zucker got. That's my view. Get over it kid!


Judging by how you write, I’m guessing I’m older than you.

You think good players find themselves on four teams in a little over a year very often? You don’t think that’s a bit of a red flag?

Galchenyuk is declining. His points per game has gone down each of the last four years I believe. You can say 2+2=13 all you want, but it doesn’t make you right.

Cheers
20 févr. 2020 à 19 h 32
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Judging by how you write, I’m guessing I’m older than you.

You think good players find themselves on four teams in a little over a year very often? You don’t think that’s a bit of a red flag?

Galchenyuk is declining. His points per game has gone down each of the last four years I believe. You can say 2+2=13 all you want, but it doesn’t make you right.

Cheers


I should have noticed you were older. Seniors tend to be stubborn even when they're wrong.

There is no correlation between the number of teams a player has played for and whether or not they are declining. If that were the case, Marleau/Backes/Thornton/Getzlaf... literally all players over the age of 35 would be bouncing around from one team to another every year.

Funny how you focused on Chuky's declining P/GP, but failed to mention Chuky's stable G/GP. Nice cherry-picking to suit your narrative. Chucky's not a cap dump. Get over it old man!
20 févr. 2020 à 20 h 6
#17
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: mytduxfan
I should have noticed you were older. Seniors tend to be stubborn even when they're wrong.

There is no correlation between the number of teams a player has played for and whether or not they are declining. If that were the case, Marleau/Backes/Thornton/Getzlaf... literally all players over the age of 35 would be bouncing around from one team to another every year.

Funny how you focused on Chuky's declining P/GP, but failed to mention Chuky's stable G/GP. Nice cherry-picking to suit your narrative. Chucky's not a cap dump. Get over it old man!


I’m 31. I assumed you were in your teens because you call him chucks like a damn toddler. I should have specified. You think good players in their mid 20’s find themselves on four teams in a little over a year very often? You don’t think that’s a bit of a red flag?

First it was kid, now it’s old man. Yikes. You’ve just said, “no, he’s awesome!” Like 20 times. Are you going to be a fan of whatever KHL team he signs with next year?
20 févr. 2020 à 20 h 24
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I’m 31. I assumed you were in your teens because you call him chucks like a damn toddler. I should have specified. You think good players in their mid 20’s find themselves on four teams in a little over a year very often? You don’t think that’s a bit of a red flag?


I don't care how old you are. Stop talking about "4 team in 18 months" and show me the numbers that prove Chuky's s declining. 1 bad season doesn't mean he's declining and suddenly a cap dump, it's just a down year.

Quoting: Bcarlo25
First it was kid, now it’s old man. Yikes. You’ve just said, “no, he’s awesome!” Like 20 times. Are you going to be a fan of whatever KHL team he signs with next year?


I've proven my point with statistics. You've done nothing but assert your baseless opinion of him... oh, wait... there was that cherry-picked stat about his P/GP "declining", falling to mention his stable G/GP and consistency to produce ~20 goals per year. You've lost this argument. That's why you're just resorting to pointless statements in some feeble attempt to get under my skin. Still waiting on that source that Galc is destined for Russian by the way.
20 févr. 2020 à 20 h 31
#19
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: mytduxfan
I don't care how old you are. Stop talking about "4 team in 18 months" and show me the numbers that prove Chuky's s declining. 1 bad season doesn't mean he's declining and suddenly a cap dump, it's just a down year.



I've proven my point with statistics. You've done nothing but assert your baseless opinion of him... oh, wait... there was that cherry-picked stat about his P/GP "declining", falling to mention his stable G/GP and consistency to produce ~20 goals per year. You've lost this argument. That's why you're just resorting to pointless statements in some feeble attempt to get under my skin. Still waiting on that source that Galc is destined for Russian by the way.


You’re going to be waiting for that source a long time. If you would fully read my posts, you would have seen that when you first asked, i said that it was a logical conclusion that i reached on my own. I tend to use logic. Try it some time. I did mention that Galchenyuk’s point per game total had declined every year since his 30 goal season. So, i did show the decline. You just don’t want to see it. You have an irrational love for Galchenyuk that is blocking logic and reason, so I’m done here.

PS: Learn to spell, Galc is as nauseating as chucky. His name is galchenyuk, the number 2 is spelled, “two,” and there’s no “e,” in the world, “aging.”
20 févr. 2020 à 21 h 3
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Bcarlo25
You’re going to be waiting for that source a long time. If you would fully read my posts, you would have seen that when you first asked, i said that it was a logical conclusion that i reached on my own. I tend to use logic. Try it some time.


So you have no source and it's just something you "feel" will happen. Unfortunately, your feelings aren't evidence. That's a big L for you I guess.

Quoting: Bcarlo25
I did mention that Galchenyuk’s point per game total had declined every year since his 30 goal season. So, i did show the decline. You just don’t want to see it. You have an irrational love for Galchenyuk that is blocking logic and reason, so I’m done here.


So stable goals per game = declining. Your logic is failing you! Funny how you value points more than goals when goals is what wins games. More awful logic on your part.

For the record, Chuky's P/GP went up after his 30 goal season from 0.68 to 0.72 (https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/g/galchal01.html). Maybe check his statistics before commenting next time. Another L for you.

Quoting: Bcarlo25
PS: Learn to spell, Galc is as nauseating as chucky. His name is galchenyuk, the number 2 is spelled, “two,” and there’s no “e,” in the world, “aging.”


And that's a third L... you're out! Losers who can't admit their wrong always resort to pointing out spelling errors... so weak. Btw, Galchenyuk has a capital G at the front, just everyone else's name. Your spelling and grammar is way better than mine sarcasm
20 févr. 2020 à 21 h 7
#21
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: mytduxfan
So you have no source and it's just something you "feel" will happen. Unfortunately, your feelings aren't evidence. That's a big L for you I guess.



So stable goals per game = declining. Your logic is failing you! Funny how you value points more than goals when goals is what wins games. More awful logic on your part.

For the record, Chuky's P/GP went up after his 30 goal season from 0.68 to 0.72 (https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/g/galchal01.html). Maybe check his statistics before commenting next time. Another L for you.



And that's a third L... you're out! Losers who can't admit their wrong always resort to pointing out spelling errors... so weak. Btw, Galchenyuk has a capital G at the front, just everyone else's name. Your spelling and grammar is way better than mine sarcasm


I never pretended there was a source. I was always up front that it was my opinion, which based on a logical conclusion i had reached. L? Um. Okay.

Bye now.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage