SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rate 1-5 in the comments Destinations for players

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 févr. 2020
Publié: 17 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Example
Keith - COL = 3
Gus - VGK = 5
Lehner - CAR = 4
Saad - Boston = 3

Note: Please feel free to rate only the teams you care about. I would like to see your rating/opinion more if you are a fan of the team receiving the players.
Note: Returns withheld, this is just an exercise to test how people would feel about these destinations for players.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
COL
  1. Keith, Duncan
Détails additionnels:
Keith marks the start of a teardown. He's not as young as he once was, but he is still playing at a top-level. I was too young to see Chelios play for the Hawks, but I do know was 37 when we traded him to Detroit. Im not saying that Keith is Chelios, but I think he still has a couple of years of really good hockey yet. Any contender should theoretically be happy to have him, probably not as their first defenseman, but happy to have him nonetheless.
2.
CHI
VGK
  1. Gustafsson, Erik
Détails additionnels:
This makes sense.
3.
CHI
CAR
  1. Lehner, Robin (2 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
I have had Carolina fans tell me that goaltending is not the problem this year. However, I believe that Lehner still makes sense for Carolina to acquire and potentially resign. I think both Carolina Goalies have 2 years left on their contracts, so from an outsiders perspective I think it makes sense.
4.
CHI
BOS
  1. Saad, Brandon
Détails additionnels:
I don't think we sell off Saad, and would probably extend him given the chance, but I think Boston makes sense as long as the cap makes sense.

PIT and TBL have both bulked up for the playoffs, will Boston do the same?
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $44 858 224 $0 $7 665 000 $36 641 776 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
1
4
2
4
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 24
#2
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: AFOX10900
1
4
2
4


Why do you think Keith to Col does not work? A good mentor for Bowen Byram next year, playoff experience, still a good player.
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 25
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,534
Mentions "j'aime": 9,575
1
4
5
4

***EDIT*** COL doesn't need Keith. They need PK and I think they're mediocre in net. Also, Keith has Full NMC and cap recapture...understood that wasn't part of the question just other factors needing to be considered.
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 26
#4
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: exo2769
1
4
5
4

Is it because Keith is going to a division rival?
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 30
#5
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 926
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Why do you think Keith to Col does not work? A good mentor for Bowen Byram next year, playoff experience, still a good player.


Colorado just has so many good defensemen- Makar, Graves, Zadorov and Girard, with Byram coming up, with the added caveat that they have Cole and Johnson locked in for awhile as the "vets and mentors", Johnson with some no trade protection. I don't see why they need a LHD like Keith, who is playing fine, but is also very old and still signed for awhile. Keith has a NMC too, how likely is it that he'll waive? A lot pieces that don't really fit together there.
Goavs141 a aimé ceci.
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 30
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Why do you think Keith to Col does not work? A good mentor for Bowen Byram next year, playoff experience, still a good player.


Contract, I know they have space, but they don't like contracts that will go past 2-3 years when they'll have to pay their stars (im not wrong right, Keith has like 4 years left still) plus it's an inter divisional trade, CHI is gonna charge COL more, and with who they already have it's not gonna be worth the marginal upgrade and to take on the last few years of that deal which will cause them cap issues, and will be an anchor for them likely, he is already showing small signs of regression, and still has a bit too much term... plus inter divisional trades...
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 33
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 291
Mentions "j'aime": 41
1 not sure Kieth agrees to trade
1 Vegas in cap hell
4
4
Goavs141 a aimé ceci.
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 37
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
1
3
2
2

Dont think Keith will want to go to Colorado because he's already stated he wants to stay in Chicago plus Colorado has a plethora of young defense already. They need a depth forward more than a defenseman.
While Gus to Vegas makes sense in that they need offense from the backend, they really need a RHD and not another lefty. So I dont think it necessarily works.
I can see Chicago signing Lehner in the offseason and letting Crawford walk.
Saad to Boston while it makes sense, based on Coleman's value for non-rentals I dont think this works in Boston's favor
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 39
#9
DaBus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,404
Mentions "j'aime": 489
1
4
3
4

Colorado does not need Keith and sending him to a division rival would be a mistake. I think Saad could also go to Edmonton if he is moved. If the Hawks cannot agree with Lehner before the deadline he should be moved. Gus should be moved regardless, because of cap and with Mitchell potentially coming next year there will be a logjam.
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 40
#10
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
From the perspective of a Hawks fan,

Keith - COL = 2: Trading a franchise icon within the division would be a tough pill to swallow and even then, I don't totally see him fitting in Colorado or getting a great return for him. Florida is where I see him going to reunite with Coach Q.

Gus - VGK = 5: Vegas could use another defenseman and Gus has a lot of upside. Might be a stretch here, but offensive defensemen like Burns and Karlsson have thrived under Pete DeBoer. Perhaps he could get a boost down the stretch out there. He could also probably fetch a solid return, especially with what Greene went for yesterday.

Lehner - CAR = 5: Personally, I don't think Lehner gets moved, I think that even if we do "sell off" they'll keep him in hopes that they can sneak in and take a run at re-signing him. That said, Carolina has a ton of prospects I'd be interested in, as well as 4 picks in the first two rounds this season (once the conditions on the Fox trade are met).

Saad - Boston = 4: Saad would be great for the Bruins. I don't know what the Hawks would get back but I know they'd either have to retain or take on David Backes. Urho Vaakanainen is the guy I'm interested in, or their first round pick of course, although it would probably be 27th overall at the highest.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
17 févr. 2020 à 11 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 443
Mentions "j'aime": 191
1 never
2 it might work but it would be tough with the cap
3 they definently need an upgrade in the backend idk if its d or a goalie tho
4 i do think they should try to get a upgrade idk if he's what they need tho
17 févr. 2020 à 12 h 7
#12
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,598
Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
1
4
3
4 But we shoudlnt trade him
17 févr. 2020 à 12 h 28
#13
Go Boltz! & Go Avs!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 460
Mentions "j'aime": 102
Yes i heard Boston is allin on Kreider,Palmieri, so they will get a pretty good player just like tampa and pittsburgh....i don't think they will go for Saad though...
1st round pick of boston is a guaranteed in any deal + possibly prospects, if the market stays same high value...
Lehner i think stays... Chicago will say no to any offers on Lehner, that's what i think about him... Goalies are not that common this close to trade deadline i think, Campbell was last goalie trade imo this season...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage