SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burns to DAL and COL gets a couple of HOFers

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 16 févr. 2020
Publié: 16 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
2.
SJS
  1. Radulov, Alexander
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Chmelevski, Alexander
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PHI)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (PHI)
5.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $55 406 583 $660 750 $297 500 $26 093 417 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
960 000 $960 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
827 500 $827 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 févr. 2020 à 14 h 39
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
As a DAL fan I'd decline this as it pretty much forces us to protect 4 D-men (Heiskanen, Klingberg, Lindell and Burns) in the expansion draft.

We could also leave Burns unprotected, but the risk of him being taken and us getting nothing left would be too high. Especially if he keeps performing on a good level.
16 févr. 2020 à 15 h 1
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Avs would probably only be able to take on Thorton with how their contract situation is on with the NHL roster and probably would have to look at Nieto being part of the deal just to make it work.

Avs just cant absorb NHL contracts without other moves, cant see them doing multiple just to fit in those guys. With how sakic does thing, I would think he would only be talking the sharks about Labanc and looking at packing up Jost to get him. Dont see him picking up multiple rentals
16 févr. 2020 à 15 h 32
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,359
Mentions "j'aime": 1,578
Quoting: coga16
Avs would probably only be able to take on Thorton with how their contract situation is on with the NHL roster and probably would have to look at Nieto being part of the deal just to make it work.

Avs just cant absorb NHL contracts without other moves, cant see them doing multiple just to fit in those guys. With how sakic does thing, I would think he would only be talking the sharks about Labanc and looking at packing up Jost to get him. Dont see him picking up multiple rentals


Colorado has $30 million in cap space at the TDL, they only have 46 contracts, and there are no roster limits after the trade deadline. No reason they couldn't make this deal
16 févr. 2020 à 16 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: toque
Colorado has $30 million in cap space at the TDL, they only have 46 contracts, and there are no roster limits after the trade deadline. No reason they couldn't make this deal


they dont have anyone who is waiver exempt, cant straight add without moving rosters out or putting someone on waivers
16 févr. 2020 à 17 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,359
Mentions "j'aime": 1,578
Quoting: coga16
they dont have anyone who is waiver exempt, cant straight add without moving rosters out or putting someone on waivers


But if this trade was made at the deadline there would be no need, since you have have as many players as you want as long as you remain cap compliant
16 févr. 2020 à 17 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: toque
But if this trade was made at the deadline there would be no need, since you have have as many players as you want as long as you remain cap compliant


I didnt think it was like that, thought it only expanded to a 25 man roster after the deadline is done.
When does it expand?
16 févr. 2020 à 17 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,359
Mentions "j'aime": 1,578
Quoting: coga16
I didnt think it was like that, thought it only expanded to a 25 man roster after the deadline is done.
When does it expand?


It's an unlimited number of players. It kicks in on trade deadline day, so February 24 this season.

Teams have to remain cap compliant by the end of the year. What you see sometimes is a team goes over the cap on a daily basis after the deadline, but because they've banked enough space, they remain cap compliant by the end of the year. E.g. the Jets last year https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/jets/cap-tracker/chart/2019
16 févr. 2020 à 17 h 30
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: toque
It's an unlimited number of players. It kicks in on trade deadline day, so February 24 this season.

Teams have to remain cap compliant by the end of the year. What you see sometimes is a team goes over the cap on a daily basis after the deadline, but because they've banked enough space, they remain cap compliant by the end of the year. E.g. the Jets last year https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/jets/cap-tracker/chart/2019


ok that would make more sense then. If thats the case yes Avs could snipe up that trade...stilll dont see the reason why they would do both, Thornton would be the only guy that makes sense

thanks for the clarity
toque a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage