SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could this be how San Jose gets into the 1st Round

Créé par: BeterChiarelli
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 15 févr. 2020
Publié: 15 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I understand that he's the Shark's best prospect.

However, I am curious if his attitude has done enough to result in the organization losing favour with Merkley. His age and skillset make him an incredibly desirable piece for the Devils to add, and Arizona's pick has a high chance of landing between #10-16.

With a roster at 100% firepower, this team shouldn't be THIS bad. All it needs is either a more confident Jones or an entirely different goaltender and there should be some relevance for another few seasons. What if Merkley isn't a part of the short-term solution? If the organization wants to give this group of guys the benefit of the doubt and either make moves to remain a playoff team (or act like a Minnesota-esque pretender, either works for me) , does moving a piece without disrupting the core in order to acquire draft capital make sense?

Part of me wonders if Zacha + Arizona 1st would be more enticing, but there would likely need to be something else going back to New Jersey.
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
CAR
  1. Dillon, Brenden (1 635 000 $ retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Karlsson, Melker (1 000 000 $ retained)
3.
SJS
  1. Calvert, Matt
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (COL)
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de PHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $63 930 749 $660 750 $367 500 $17 569 251 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
960 000 $960 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 févr. 2020 à 22 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 63
Mentions "j'aime": 8
No way New Jersey does that given how high their draft pick will be.

On the bright side, Merkley may be improving

https://lfpress.com/sports/hockey/london-knights-addition-of-merkley-ranks-as-ohls-best-trade-this-season
15 févr. 2020 à 23 h 1
#2
Démarrer sujet
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: TheGreekRat
No way New Jersey does that given how high their draft pick will be.

On the bright side, Merkley may be improving

https://lfpress.com/sports/hockey/london-knights-addition-of-merkley-ranks-as-ohls-best-trade-this-season


It's not the Devil's own pick. It's the Arizona pick from the Hall trade.
TheGreekRat a aimé ceci.
15 févr. 2020 à 23 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Merkley>>>>whatever mid first prospect we get
15 févr. 2020 à 23 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 63
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
It's not the Devil's own pick. It's the Arizona pick from the Hall trade.


looks like I forgot how to read.

now I think San Jose declines because Merkley is getting even more points with London and his attitude is rumored to be getting better. After all, he could have been a top 10 pick in the draft if it wasn't for his attitude.
15 févr. 2020 à 23 h 11
#5
Démarrer sujet
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: papishark
Merkley>>>>whatever mid first prospect we get


That's not set in stone.

The purpose of the trade assumes that right now Merkley is the more valuable asset. I won't dispute that. But let's also not forget the talent had in that #10-20 range from the 2015 draft. Now let's consider that this draft is deeper. If there's a forward that the Sharks can select in that range AND upper management believes that said player could be a factor after an extra year in junior/Europe/college (Holloway comes to mind here), it seems like a really smart add to help both short- and long-term.

Merkley is likely a season to a season and a half from being a full-time NHL player. He's then going to be bogged down by Burns and Karlsson until the very second their wheels fall off. If he's not ready to take a top-4 role - or even a top pairing role - it could destroy his development. A top forward on this roster at least has some insulation and won't immediately need to be relied upon as "the guy".

Quoting: TheGreekRat
looks like I forgot how to read.

now I think San Jose declines because Merkley is getting even more points with London and his attitude is rumored to be getting better. After all, he could have been a top 10 pick in the draft if it wasn't for his attitude.


His lack of defensive talent in his draft year probably hurt him just as much as his piss-poor attitude did for what it's worth.

While he's worked substantially on both, first impressions last a lifetime. I doubt Doug Wilson has forgotten the utter nonsense Merkley's found himself in the center of. That's stuff that's hard to sweep under the rug in any sphere, regardless of performance.
15 févr. 2020 à 23 h 15
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
That's not set in stone.

The purpose of the trade assumes that right now Merkley is the more valuable asset. I won't dispute that. But let's also not forget the talent had in that #10-20 range from the 2015 draft. Now let's consider that this draft is deeper. If there's a forward that the Sharks can select in that range AND upper management believes that said player could be a factor after an extra year in junior/Europe/college (Holloway comes to mind here), it seems like a really smart add to help both short- and long-term.

Merkley is likely a season to a season and a half from being a full-time NHL player. He's then going to be bogged down by Burns and Karlsson until the very second their wheels fall off. If he's not ready to take a top-4 role - or even a top pairing role - it could destroy his development. A top forward on this roster at least has some insulation and won't immediately need to be relied upon as "the guy".



His lack of defensive talent in his draft year probably hurt him just as much as his piss-poor attitude did for what it's worth.

While he's worked substantially on both, first impressions last a lifetime. I doubt Doug Wilson has forgotten the utter nonsense Merkley's found himself in the center of. That's stuff that's hard to sweep under the rug in any sphere, regardless of performance.


Doug frankly doesnt care. He didnt care when he signed Kane, and he wont be looking to give up Merkley. Now if someone came to me with the option of a pick from 4-7 yeah I probably do it, but outside the top ten its a no.
bunnymcfoo a aimé ceci.
16 févr. 2020 à 0 h 16
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
These trades all favor the Sharks...
16 févr. 2020 à 14 h 31
#8
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
I wanna applaud you for this proposal -- that COL deal is pretty intuitive and realistic -- not many people have tossed around the idea of Patty and Jumbo moving to a cup contender for the same team, and with the recent Kadri injury, COL might be the perfect fit.

Dillon trade is very realistic with value and team, as is the NYI deal (although they tend not to trade picks so maybe a team like CLG bites instead).

I don't think I do the Merk for 1st deal though. Merk's shown too much promise, but it's an interesting idea and definitely worth DW doing research and asking the guy coaching Merks on what his progress both on a hockey level and attitude has been.

I think the way the Sharks get their 1st is by trading Burns, retaining cap, and taking on a cap dump.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage