SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Best Case Scenario

Créé par: DarthKane
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 févr. 2020
Publié: 13 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 750 000 $
23 000 000 $
34 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Shesterkin, Igor
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2284 000 000 $75 194 431 $1 090 244 $7 050 000 $8 805 569 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 févr. 2020 à 10 h 57
#1
Cup of Coco
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,151
Mentions "j'aime": 220
gtfo of here lmfaoooooo
13 févr. 2020 à 10 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 828
Mentions "j'aime": 715
There are 57 scenarios better than this one.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 2
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Jesus. shakes head

Rangers just keeled over from laughing so hard.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 2
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
Quoting: TheJonSnow
There are 57 scenarios better than this one.


That and the fact that I think NYR favors Shesterkin over Georgiev so they wouldnt trade him unless it was for something spectacular.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 8
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 391
Mentions "j'aime": 143
trading two nobodies for a good goaltender is in fact a good scenario, i agree
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 15
#6
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Gofnut999
Jesus. shakes head

Rangers just keeled over from laughing so hard.


Quoting: SlickWilly
That and the fact that I think NYR favors Shesterkin over Georgiev so they wouldnt trade him unless it was for something spectacular.


Quoting: grok
trading two nobodies for a good goaltender is in fact a good scenario, i agree


Beaudin and Kurashev are good prospects.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 17
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 828
Mentions "j'aime": 715
Quoting: SlickWilly
That and the fact that I think NYR favors Shesterkin over Georgiev so they wouldnt trade him unless it was for something spectacular.


Oh absolutely. I was just thinking of the 57 scenarios where Seabrook stays on LTIR.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Beaudin and Kurashev are good prospects.


Yeah for sure I think theyre good prospects, but from what Ive seen he's the heir apparent to the King, and he already looks like a stud at 24. I think a deal would also have to include Lankinen or Delia, I would figure something like a protected 1st, Beaudin or Kurashev, and Lankinen would probably be closer to what theyre looking for
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 27
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 698
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Quoting: grok
trading two nobodies for a good goaltender is in fact a good scenario, i agree



May as well admit now you dont know any prospects before you continue posting
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 28
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 698
Mentions "j'aime": 166
Quoting: SlickWilly
Yeah for sure I think theyre good prospects, but from what Ive seen he's the heir apparent to the King, and he already looks like a stud at 24. I think a deal would also have to include Lankinen or Delia, I would figure something like a protected 1st, Beaudin or Kurashev, and Lankinen would probably be closer to what theyre looking for



No goalie commands that return lol let alone a propect
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 34
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Beaudin and Kurashev are good prospects.


One is decent, one is org depth. Igor is top 10 goalie potential, quickly. Pass.
13 févr. 2020 à 12 h 39
#12
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Gofnut999
One is decent, one is org depth. Igor is top 10 goalie potential, quickly. Pass.


I assume you mean to say Kurashev is org depth, I think you may want to rethink that assumption. He is a legit prospect. I copied some text from various "The Athletic" articles about the Blackhawks farm system.

Another thing, Im not arguing that this trade is fair, or even good for the Blackhawks for that matter, just that Kurashev and Beaudin arent nobodies as many have implied.

Scott Wheeler
Speaking of players who’ve created offense on a team that lacks it …
After getting injured in Traverse City (one of many Blackhawks prospects who suffered that fate at the annual prospects tournament), Kurashev has been consistent for the IceHogs as a 20-year-old rookie this year. In fact, had he played the full season, he’d probably be first or second on the team in scoring. Kurashev is also a player whose raw numbers have never tended to match up with how impressive he is when you watch him. Part of that may be your mind playing tricks on you and the illusion some players create by seeming to ooze talent while not producing — one should lead to the other after all. Part of that is also the talent he lacked around him in Quebec, where he was the Remparts leading scorer in both seasons. He would’ve put up bigger numbers on a contending team, I’m sure of it. Offensively, there’s no one tool in Kurashev’s game that looks like it will hold him back. He has slick hands through traffic and in tight, he can break defenders down 1-on-1 or shoot through them with a quick release and a hard shot, he’s strong on his feet and he’s a creative passer who always has his head up and doesn’t have tunnel vision just because he’s a natural scorer. He’s also got a late birthday and only turned 20 in-season last October, which bodes well for his progression moving forward. Though he’s not physical, I also think his defensive game is better than most realize (it has occasionally been a source of criticism). He needs to get faster to truly reach his potential but I wouldn’t be surprised if he becomes a 40ish-point player at the NHL level.

Corey Pronman
Tier: Legit/chance bubble
Kurashev had a fine year in the QMJHL but what most people remember was his awesome World Juniors where he was a top player in the tournament. That is Kurashev in a nutshell. He’s got all the talent to take over a game, but the consistency isn’t always there. Inside the offensive zone he’s great. He’s got skill, high-end vision and a bullet shot that can beat goalies from a distance. He’s a guy you want with the puck on his stick on the power play. His skating is fine but his quickness isn’t his selling point. He needs to be better off the puck, and particularly show up more often and have a great year with a club team.
13 févr. 2020 à 12 h 47
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I assume you mean to say Kurashev is org depth, I think you may want to rethink that assumption. He is a legit prospect. I copied some text from various "The Athletic" articles about the Blackhawks farm system.

Another thing, Im not arguing that this trade is fair, or even good for the Blackhawks for that matter, just that Kurashev and Beaudin arent nobodies as many have implied.

Scott Wheeler
Speaking of players who’ve created offense on a team that lacks it …
After getting injured in Traverse City (one of many Blackhawks prospects who suffered that fate at the annual prospects tournament), Kurashev has been consistent for the IceHogs as a 20-year-old rookie this year. In fact, had he played the full season, he’d probably be first or second on the team in scoring. Kurashev is also a player whose raw numbers have never tended to match up with how impressive he is when you watch him. Part of that may be your mind playing tricks on you and the illusion some players create by seeming to ooze talent while not producing — one should lead to the other after all. Part of that is also the talent he lacked around him in Quebec, where he was the Remparts leading scorer in both seasons. He would’ve put up bigger numbers on a contending team, I’m sure of it. Offensively, there’s no one tool in Kurashev’s game that looks like it will hold him back. He has slick hands through traffic and in tight, he can break defenders down 1-on-1 or shoot through them with a quick release and a hard shot, he’s strong on his feet and he’s a creative passer who always has his head up and doesn’t have tunnel vision just because he’s a natural scorer. He’s also got a late birthday and only turned 20 in-season last October, which bodes well for his progression moving forward. Though he’s not physical, I also think his defensive game is better than most realize (it has occasionally been a source of criticism). He needs to get faster to truly reach his potential but I wouldn’t be surprised if he becomes a 40ish-point player at the NHL level.

Corey Pronman
Tier: Legit/chance bubble
Kurashev had a fine year in the QMJHL but what most people remember was his awesome World Juniors where he was a top player in the tournament. That is Kurashev in a nutshell. He’s got all the talent to take over a game, but the consistency isn’t always there. Inside the offensive zone he’s great. He’s got skill, high-end vision and a bullet shot that can beat goalies from a distance. He’s a guy you want with the puck on his stick on the power play. His skating is fine but his quickness isn’t his selling point. He needs to be better off the puck, and particularly show up more often and have a great year with a club team.



I’m not saying they are nobodies. What i am saying is Igor is going to be exceptional.

KHL 80-19 1.68 .935

AHL 1.90 .934

NHL 2.18 .941

Sure KHL inflates goalie stats and small sample sizes in North America and goalies are volatile, stud one minute dud the next. But he’s the real deal already #1 caliber goalie just waiting for that job.

Recent article rated the 31 starting goalies. Markstrom, Rittich, Varlamov were #9-10-11. I’d put him in their category already and certainly over them long term. 🤷🏻‍♂️
13 févr. 2020 à 12 h 53
#14
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: Gofnut999
I’m not saying they are nobodies. What i am saying is Igor is going to be exceptional.

KHL 80-19 1.68 .935

AHL 1.90 .934

NHL 2.18 .941

Sure KHL inflates goalie stats and small sample sizes in North America and goalies are volatile, stud one minute dud the next. But he’s the real deal already #1 caliber goalie just waiting for that job.

Recent article rated the 31 starting goalies. Markstrom, Rittich, Varlamov were #9-10-11. I’d put him in their category already and certainly over them long term. 🤷🏻‍♂️


No argument that he's a good goalie and could be a great NHL goaltender. I just wanted to let anyone who reads this post understand that Kurashev is in fact a good prospect. As I said, I don't think this is a fair trade, or that the Rangers would even do it. I just want to establish that Kruashev is a good prospect.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage