SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Full Biblical Rebuild

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 févr. 2020
Publié: 13 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let me start by asking, is anyone really surprised? Stan, you tried, as you’ve done the three years over and over, to trick us and make us think you know how to build a team. Sadly, it turns out you do only know how to add to what someone else already built for you.

Now, it’s time for the nuclear option. Time to go FULL BIBLICAL! Blow it up, and get as many 1st to 2nds as you can. Strome, gone. Gus, gone. Nylander, you will always be in Joker’s shadow. Lehner, love ya, but need draft capital. These are merely a few. Needless to say, mismanagement and poor development have accelerated our plunge back to the dark ages. This is fall from Grace of our own creation, born out of the ignorance and ego of one Stan bowman. From the awful trades to the the even worse draft record (especially the first round), you’ve reached your shelf life.

Also, Kings fans, don’t worry, I’m not going to disrespect you by making a turcotte trade. I love the kid and you guys should too.

CHAOS!!!!!
Transactions
1.
2.
CHI
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Necas, Martin
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
3.
CHI
  1. Backes, David
  2. Vaakanainen, Urho
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Saad, Brandon (3 000 000 $ retained)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
5.
CHI
  1. Miller, K'Andre [Liste de réserve]
  2. Smith, Brendan
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de BOS
Logo de CAR
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $64 349 187 $0 $4 295 000 $17 150 813 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 févr. 2020 à 3 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 334
Just saw the scores for tonight’s games. I was wondering what sparked such a dramatic diatribe. 😛
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
13 févr. 2020 à 3 h 42
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,028
Mentions "j'aime": 9,323
Do not trade Kubalik
13 févr. 2020 à 3 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
Do not trade Kubalik


Hey come on! Full biblical!

Not to mention, it’d be so bowman thing to do!
13 févr. 2020 à 3 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,028
Mentions "j'aime": 9,323
Quoting: HatterTParty
Hey come on! Full biblical!

Not to mention, it’d be so bowman thing to do!


Well right after he trades your boy Dach for another reclamation project
13 févr. 2020 à 3 h 46
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
Well right after he trades your boy Dach for another reclamation project


See! Now your gettin it!

I gotta deal with dach for another 15 years probably. Unless he goes full nosedive. Like I’ve said, I gotta accept it even if I never I like it.
13 févr. 2020 à 3 h 47
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,028
Mentions "j'aime": 9,323
Quoting: HatterTParty
See! Now your gettin it!

I gotta deal with dach for another 15 years probably. Unless he goes full nosedive. Like I’ve said, I gotta accept it even if I never I like it.


You'll like him in a few years. I was wrong predraft on the kid, he's got all the tools.
13 févr. 2020 à 3 h 52
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
You'll like him in a few years. I was wrong predraft on the kid, he's got all the tools.


Sad thing is, I just don’t like guys of his archetype. Plain and simple. I’ve never ever liked Ryan getzlaf. If your a big player and a forward, but you don’t play a dynamic speed game or score goals, I just don’t care for the type. I love draisital, scheifele (mainly cuz he’s so god damn smart), and Mario lemieux, but I can’t stand getzlaf.

He’ll be a hawk and I’ll always be a hawks fan, just not a fan of his. Just like with bickell.
13 févr. 2020 à 3 h 54
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,028
Mentions "j'aime": 9,323
Quoting: HatterTParty
Sad thing is, I just don’t like guys of his archetype. Plain and simple. I’ve never ever liked Ryan getzlaf. If your a big player and a forward, but you don’t play a dynamic speed game or score goals, I just don’t care for the type. I love draisital, scheifele (mainly cuz he’s so god damn smart), and Mario lemieux, but I can’t stand getzlaf.

He’ll be a hawk and I’ll always be a hawks fan, just not a fan of his. Just like with bickell.


Turcotte isn't looking that great and for a top 5 pick he should be playing a pretty dominate game given that it's college hockey.
13 févr. 2020 à 4 h 15
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
Turcotte isn't looking that great and for a top 5 pick he should be playing a pretty dominate game given that it's college hockey.


Believe me, I understand that Dach at present feels like the better option, but I don’t look at the draft as an immediate fix. It’s really not meant to be. Dach to me is always gonna be a black sheep for who he isn’t. Sure it’s easy to look at turcotte struggle and say that he’s not who he was suppose to be, but he may just be a two year project, and that’s okay!

Toews and getzlaf scored 54 points and 39 points respectively in their rookie seasons while playing less than 65 games. Dach is on pace to play more games and score less. Does that make Dach a disappointment? I’ll admit I still don’t care for him, but I think it’s because he never should have been an nhler this year. Many people will obviously say the same. Dach will never have that dynamic edge to his game that players like mackinnon or even Dylan Larkin have. That’s fine, but I just don’t like players that lack that excitement, cuz that’s what I find beautiful about hockey. The speed, the elegance, the showtime.

Dach likes to say his style of play is “winning”. Then go out there and win kid, cuz up to this point in your career, you haven’t won a single thing. Not in the nhl, not in juniors.
13 févr. 2020 à 6 h 32
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 334
So your issue isn’t with Dach and his style of play but more that he got picked before other players who are more suitable to your tastes? Just wondering if him as a player would be more palatable to you if he were chosen later.
13 févr. 2020 à 9 h 4
#11
Chewbacca88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,184
Mentions "j'aime": 114
3 things.
1. DO NOT TRADE KUBALIK! The guy is a stud.
2. DO NOT TRADE ADB! He's just having a down year. He has all the tools to be a consistent 40-50 goal scorer.
3. Dach is gonna be great for Chicago. I think he's gonna turn out to be a lot like a Jonathan Toews or Anze Kopitar. Someone who won't necessarily score a hundred points but is decent defensively, has a big body, and is actually a SOLID SKATER which he has proven to I hope all of us this year. I think in 2-4 years he'll be scoring 70+ points.
13 févr. 2020 à 10 h 16
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Weezley
Just saw the scores for tonight’s games. I was wondering what sparked such a dramatic diatribe. 😛


People who can’t see any positives with this club. They only need to go back to last season and see how bad defensively they were then. The have improved.

I HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL YEAR. IF THE POWER PLAY WORKED THIS CLUB BE HIGHER IN THE STANDINGS. I would rather be on the side of 3 -0 lost, and know in my heart as a team we played well enough to win, than to be outshot/outplayed and the goaltending made it closer than it was.

If you can’t see this club is better than than how they were in November, then you sadly need to educate yourself about the game of hockey. The Hawks are not the Bruins, the Capitals, the Lightning, the Penguins, the Blues or the Avalanche. The are NOT Kings or Red Wing either.

In November, I was in favour of a rebuild. My view was based on the speed of the team. This team can skate if they have the will do to so. The pieces are there. Starting with Lehner. Trading him for a draft pick doesn’t guarantee, that pick will play next season, or the Hawks will have a suitable replacement. There are other players that can be moved to improve this club.
13 févr. 2020 à 10 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: CrazyK04
3 things.
1. DO NOT TRADE KUBALIK! The guy is a stud.
2. DO NOT TRADE ADB! He's just having a down year. He has all the tools to be a consistent 40-50 goal scorer.
3. Dach is gonna be great for Chicago. I think he's gonna turn out to be a lot like a Jonathan Toews or Anze Kopitar. Someone who won't necessarily score a hundred points but is decent defensively, has a big body, and is actually a SOLID SKATER which he has proven to I hope all of us this year. I think in 2-4 years he'll be scoring 70+ points.



I am impressed with Dach’s back checking. He has hockey smarts that can be taught. I like to see him play with a edge. Use his size to create space.
13 févr. 2020 à 10 h 23
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 334
Quoting: Hawksince71
People who can’t see any positives with this club. They only need to go back to last season and see how bad defensively they were then. The have improved.

I HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL YEAR. IF THE POWER PLAY WORKED THIS CLUB BE HIGHER IN THE STANDINGS. I would rather be on the side of 3 -0 lost, and know in my heart as a team we played well enough to win, than to be outshot/outplayed and the goaltending made it closer than it was.

If you can’t see this club is better than than how they were in November, then you sadly need to educate yourself about the game of hockey. The Hawks are not the Bruins, the Capitals, the Lightning, the Penguins, the Blues or the Avalanche. The are NOT Kings or Red Wing either.

In November, I was in favour of a rebuild. My view was based on the speed of the team. This team can skate if they have the will do to so. The pieces are there. Starting with Lehner. Trading him for a draft pick doesn’t guarantee, that pick will play next season, or the Hawks will have a suitable replacement. There are other players that can be moved to improve this club.


I actually watched the highlights after my post and it’s clear they dominated that game. They just ran into a hot goalie.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 20
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Weezley
So your issue isn’t with Dach and his style of play but more that he got picked before other players who are more suitable to your tastes? Just wondering if him as a player would be more palatable to you if he were chosen later.


No, actually it is still his style of play that I dislike. However, you it is fair that if the hawks were the ones picking 5th, and dach slipped that far, than yes, I woulda felt slightly better. Granted every hawks fan is gonna say that the Avs woulda picked Dach. I’m just saying theoretically, it still woulda sucked a little, but it would have been more palatable if we picked 5th.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 25
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: CrazyK04
3 things.
1. DO NOT TRADE KUBALIK! The guy is a stud.
2. DO NOT TRADE ADB! He's just having a down year. He has all the tools to be a consistent 40-50 goal scorer.
3. Dach is gonna be great for Chicago. I think he's gonna turn out to be a lot like a Jonathan Toews or Anze Kopitar. Someone who won't necessarily score a hundred points but is decent defensively, has a big body, and is actually a SOLID SKATER which he has proven to I hope all of us this year. I think in 2-4 years he'll be scoring 70+ points.


1. I’m genuinely doing that simply because it’s such a bowman thing to happen.
2. I agree and I’m still very much a debrincat guy since I was praying we would get him back in his draft year. However, as I said in an earlier post, either Colliton has to wake up and stop shuffling lines or the cat strome Kane line has to be reunited. Cuz honestly, cat and strome are not being utilized very efficiently without Kane.
3. That’s fine, and more power to him. As you can see, I didn’t trade him in this thread. People can continue to pump his tires, I’m just not gonna do that. I don’t care how he does for another 3-4 years. Once his draft class comes up, then it’ll matter. Right now doesn’t matter since the draft shouldn’t be a short term fix.
Hawks_Are_Dumm a aimé ceci.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 32
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Hawksince71
People who can’t see any positives with this club. They only need to go back to last season and see how bad defensively they were then. The have improved.

I HAVE BEEN SAYING ALL YEAR. IF THE POWER PLAY WORKED THIS CLUB BE HIGHER IN THE STANDINGS. I would rather be on the side of 3 -0 lost, and know in my heart as a team we played well enough to win, than to be outshot/outplayed and the goaltending made it closer than it was.

If you can’t see this club is better than than how they were in November, then you sadly need to educate yourself about the game of hockey. The Hawks are not the Bruins, the Capitals, the Lightning, the Penguins, the Blues or the Avalanche. The are NOT Kings or Red Wing either.

In November, I was in favour of a rebuild. My view was based on the speed of the team. This team can skate if they have the will do to so. The pieces are there. Starting with Lehner. Trading him for a draft pick doesn’t guarantee, that pick will play next season, or the Hawks will have a suitable replacement. There are other players that can be moved to improve this club.


I’m not saying this team doesn’t have positives. They did dominate last night. However, as for not being the kings or red wings, I mean, okay, but thank god kane and toews are still in their prime to keep that from happening.

Also, your power play complaints sound a lot like our PK complaints last year. If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, bowman woulda been fired not Q. Truth is, if ya don’t like the PP, than maybe someone should tell Colliton to pull his head out of his ass. Either way, I still want a rebuild. This team has fallen way too far to keep from justifying it at this point. I don’t care if Kane and toews don’t want it to happen, it just needs to. Stevie Y is rebuilding Detroit right now and I shutter to think what they could become in a few years. Get a competent GM in here with a progressive and man managing coach and start turning the team in the right direction.
13 févr. 2020 à 11 h 38
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 334
Quoting: HatterTParty
No, actually it is still his style of play that I dislike. However, you it is fair that if the hawks were the ones picking 5th, and dach slipped that far, than yes, I woulda felt slightly better. Granted every hawks fan is gonna say that the Avs woulda picked Dach. I’m just saying theoretically, it still woulda sucked a little, but it would have been more palatable if we picked 5th.


I see. Makes sense then. I was just wondering if Dach was an unpopular choice for 3 and that’s why he’s the black sheep. As far as his playing style, it is needed in a line up. Granted you could get that style of play later in the draft, it also wouldn’t come with some of the other perks he possesses.
13 févr. 2020 à 12 h 8
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Weezley
I see. Makes sense then. I was just wondering if Dach was an unpopular choice for 3 and that’s why he’s the black sheep. As far as his playing style, it is needed in a line up. Granted you could get that style of play later in the draft, it also wouldn’t come with some of the other perks he possesses.


I just look at modern hockey and don’t see a place for getzlaf styled player. I’m a big speed proponent and love the direction of the modern nhl playing style wise. Getzlaf can still hang, but many cuz he’s played for so long. Other big guys these days don’t play like getzlaf and they actually manage to thrive. Typically, I like those guys a lot! Draisital? Great goal scorer and intelligent, love him! Scheifele, smartest player in the nhl, like him. Sasha Barkov?! LOVE HIM TO DEATH, because he can score 90-100, while being dynamic two ways.

Getzlaf though, just feels too one dimensional and never came off as exciting. He’s had bad discipline, he’s a decent two way player, and is almost exclusively a playmaker. I was a playmaker when I played, but I was small and had a lot of speed. Getzlaf doesn’t influence games the way other big men like barkov or draisital do.
13 févr. 2020 à 12 h 51
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 334
Quoting: HatterTParty
I just look at modern hockey and don’t see a place for getzlaf styled player. I’m a big speed proponent and love the direction of the modern nhl playing style wise. Getzlaf can still hang, but many cuz he’s played for so long. Other big guys these days don’t play like getzlaf and they actually manage to thrive. Typically, I like those guys a lot! Draisital? Great goal scorer and intelligent, love him! Scheifele, smartest player in the nhl, like him. Sasha Barkov?! LOVE HIM TO DEATH, because he can score 90-100, while being dynamic two ways.

Getzlaf though, just feels too one dimensional and never came off as exciting. He’s had bad discipline, he’s a decent two way player, and is almost exclusively a playmaker. I was a playmaker when I played, but I was small and had a lot of speed. Getzlaf doesn’t influence games the way other big men like barkov or draisital do.


That’s a bit unrealistic to expect a team to consist solely of those types of players. They are literally aliens. Lol. Speed is one thing but to be able to perform at high speeds is another. Especially amongst the best of the best. While I agree the game is evolving there is still a place for players like Dach to be an integral part of the team. Scorers need playmakers to set up the goal, playmakers need cerebral players or even grinders to get the puck. It’s a team game.
14 févr. 2020 à 9 h 16
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: Weezley
I actually watched the highlights after my post and it’s clear they dominated that game. They just ran into a hot goalie.


They have been playing much been as a team before the all star break. They are a player or two away from being competitive, but that window will be lost if team trades away a dominate proven goaltender for a draft pick.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage