SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens fans - Labanc Dillon coming in a big trade

Créé par: yikes
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 10 févr. 2020
Publié: 10 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Looking for opinions on a potential trade.

Gauging a value as Dillon is going to be asking a market of 2nd -> 2nd plus prospect or conditions to upgrade or a singular decent (B-B+/A prospect just depends really).

Labanc’s value is all over the place but I’d like equate it to more then Kreider the top deadline winger (just my opinion). So let’s say Kreider gets a 1st plus a B prospect or something (has to be less the hall).

Just going to throw my opinion/ look on the trade itself but counters/ your opinion a trade look, obviously open to complete different trades then the one I suggest.
Transactions
SJS
  1. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
  2. Murray, Matt
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Labanc = Murray just a swap + maybe some of the thirds value
POJ = Dillon (Retention) + Thornton retention
Thornton kinda tossed in but
Dell+Jumbo(I guess) for the third
PIT
  1. Dell, Aaron
  2. Dillon, Brenden (1 627 520 $ retained)
  3. Labanc, Kevin
  4. Thornton, Joe (1 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Aaron Dell has been quite great as of late, the only reason the sharks have won games in the last 2 months. Maybe a change of scenery helps Murray?
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de PHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1981 500 000 $72 383 270 $660 750 $232 500 $9 116 730 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
960 000 $960 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 févr. 2020 à 11 h 26
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
I don’t think the pens are interested in trading Murray unless it’s for a kings ransom. Murray has been playing phenomenal the past month or so. Actually been up to par if not better than Jarry recently.
yikes a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2020 à 11 h 33
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,292
Mentions "j'aime": 19,540
I would say you are right on the mark with Labancs value. Right around the same as Kreider. RFA status and cheap deal help him a lot but Kreiders Physical presence for the playoffs and goal scoring touch even it out. Murray is an interesting offer thats a lot of trust to putnin Jarry for his 1st playoff run.
yikes a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2020 à 11 h 39
#3
Hockey God Genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,261
Mentions "j'aime": 811
Pens are NOT trading Murray this season.
10 févr. 2020 à 11 h 43
#4
Démarrer sujet
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,072
Mentions "j'aime": 12,828
Quoting: Pensfan89
I don’t think the pens are interested in trading Murray unless it’s for a kings ransom. Murray has been playing phenomenal the past month or so. Actually been up to par if not better than Jarry recently.


I was unaware (to my own negligence).

If so then no reason to trade him as
Quoting: Sidstick87
Pens are NOT trading Murray this season.


This trade falls apart then lol
10 févr. 2020 à 11 h 53
#5
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
The Penguins are committed to keeping both goalies through the season, especially now that Murray is not playing badly anymore. So this wouldn't happen.

But if it were me, I would do it. Dell has actually been better than Murray this year by pretty much every measure. Labanc is very good. Dillon and Thornton, particularly Dillion would be really helpful. Dumoulin is still injured and Marino is now inured as well.
10 févr. 2020 à 12 h 8
#6
me
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 30
Mentions "j'aime": 14
If Jarry were to take control of the net and claim the starter spot through the playoffs, I could see a draft day trade including Murray and Lebanc, but definitely not right now. Also, Murray is going to cost a ton.
10 févr. 2020 à 14 h 26
#7
D. Reedy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I would say you are right on the mark with Labancs value. Right around the same as Kreider. RFA status and cheap deal help him a lot but Kreiders Physical presence for the playoffs and goal scoring touch even it out. Murray is an interesting offer thats a lot of trust to putnin Jarry for his 1st playoff run.


You see Labanc and Kreider as the same level? Really? I haven't gotten to see Kreider play but Labanc is painfully inconsistent, bad defensively, still seems penalty prone and has very little physical strength. For what I've read, Kreider isn't a star, but is a very good all-around player and a top-line winger. Labanc is a middle-six winger with some boom/bust potential. Salary wise, Kreider sounds like a $7-8 million/year guy in comparison to Labanc who could be anywhere between $3 and $5 million/year
10 févr. 2020 à 14 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,292
Mentions "j'aime": 19,540
Quoting: DReedy14
You see Labanc and Kreider as the same level? Really? I haven't gotten to see Kreider play but Labanc is painfully inconsistent, bad defensively, still seems penalty prone and has very little physical strength. For what I've read, Kreider isn't a star, but is a very good all-around player and a top-line winger. Labanc is a middle-six winger with some boom/bust potential. Salary wise, Kreider sounds like a $7-8 million/year guy in comparison to Labanc who could be anywhere between $3 and $5 million/year


Oh no Kreider is certainly better but Labanc is an RFA right handed shot on a sweetheart contract
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage