SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Desmith

Créé par: Goavs141
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 7 févr. 2020
Publié: 7 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Since campbell cost pretty much a 2nd and a 3rd, this trade should be fair. Thanks dubas
Transactions
PIT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2681 500 000 $76 932 875 $132 500 $3 832 500 $4 567 125 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
833 750 $833 750 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 10
#1
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Well one team was desperate and the team here isnt exactly desperate. they have a pretty decent backup in MacE
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 12
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 443
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: bigZ98
Well one team was desperate and the team here isnt exactly desperate. they have a pretty decent backup in MacE


Who needs a backup g?
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 13
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Tampa would be the last team that would be interested in DeSmith, He'll need a new contract and they'll already be tight up against the cap this coming summer. I guess he's still under contract but Tampa has Curtis Mac so no need for DeSmith.
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 13
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: Mathmanmatt141
Who needs a backup g?


Not Tampa?
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,705
Mentions "j'aime": 994
How are you this drunk before noon?
Dan10900, masterjuddi et t2a2e9j12k2 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 19
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
uhhh... Campbell>DeSmith and there was one of the better bottom ers in the league added to him, it'd be more like DeSmith+Blueger for two thirds or smth...
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 22
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 443
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: AFOX10900
uhhh... Campbell>DeSmith and there was one of the better bottom ers in the league added to him, it'd be more like DeSmith+Blueger for two thirds or smth...


First off desmith>campbell, 2nd off, blueger>Clifford
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 25
#8
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Tampa would be the last team that would be interested in DeSmith, He'll need a new contract and they'll already be tight up against the cap this coming summer. I guess he's still under contract but Tampa has Curtis Mac so no need for DeSmith.


I agree with tampa doesnt need him but Desmith is signed for 2 more years at 1.2mill cap hit so he would not need a new contract
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 28
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Quoting: bigZ98
I agree with tampa doesnt need him but Desmith is signed for 2 more years at 1.2mill cap hit so he would not need a new contract


Yeah that was my mistake, It's Murray and Jarry that need the new contracts not DeSmith. For some reason i thought all 3 needed new contracts but DeSmith has two more seasons at a reasonable $1.2 million.
bigZ98 et Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 29
#10
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Quoting: Mathmanmatt141
Who needs a backup g?


Sharks need a goalie but not a backup, chicago could depending on if they resign both lehner and crawford or not, montreal is probably in need of a backup, devils next year i would assume as well
Goavs141 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 31
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Mathmanmatt141
First off desmith>campbell, 2nd off, blueger>Clifford


Gonna have to disagree on both there
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 3,902
Mentions "j'aime": 1,760
Desmith has value but I don't think it's a first. This draft is gonna be deep and trading your first for a backup who cleared waivers earlier and has 50 total NHL games makes no sense
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 34
#13
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Quoting: AFOX10900
Gonna have to disagree on both there


Campbell and Desmith is probably a toss up for me but i cant see your argument for clifford > blueger. In my opinion blueger is a much more responsible defesnsively, plays center, and has been part of the penguins most consistent line all season. Clifford imo just bring a point here and there and mostly just hits, which is fine but i feel like blueger has a lot more to his game and potential to improve offensively as well the more he plays. What is your reason for clifford > blueger?
Goavs141 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 38
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 443
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: masterjuddi
Desmith has value but I don't think it's a first. This draft is gonna be deep and trading your first for a backup who cleared waivers earlier and has 50 total NHL games makes no sense


Yeah ik i would be fine if we got 2 3rds for him, i was mainly pointing out that TML overpaid, and if that was the market value we could get a 1st for desmith
7 févr. 2020 à 10 h 45
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: bigZ98
Campbell and Desmith is probably a toss up for me but i cant see your argument for clifford > blueger. In my opinion blueger is a much more responsible defesnsively, plays center, and has been part of the penguins most consistent line all season. Clifford imo just bring a point here and there and mostly just hits, which is fine but i feel like blueger has a lot more to his game and potential to improve offensively as well the more he plays. What is your reason for clifford > blueger?


I was thinking the other way lol, Campbell>Desmith, he hasn't been completely killed on one of the worst teams in the league (he's been miles better than Quick) and blueger and Clifford is a toss up, both are near the top of the league defensively, both are about average offensively, Clifford hits more, but blueger is faster, and probably a bit better offensively, but blueger also benefits from the best coach in the game rn and playing with ZAR to boost his defensive numbers
bigZ98 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2020 à 17 h 54
#16
god like
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 993
Mentions "j'aime": 149
in what world does desmith equal a 1st Jesus. Freddy Anderson got a little more than a first. He is the only goalie traded for a 1st in the recent past. the market is flooded with goalies this off season also. the leafs were very desperate also Anderson is injured and Hutchinson is flat out below ahl standards. they also got some grit and toughness in Clifford. Campbell's play this year with the kings has him with more value than Desmith. i also think blueger age speed playing center ability on offence makes him more valuable. he fits the pens needs where Clifford fits the leafs needs.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage