SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens

Créé par: ashaw9377
Équipe: 2019-20 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 3 févr. 2020
Publié: 3 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Does taking on most of Galchenyuks salary get Hallander and a 1st from Pitt for Kreider? Also at 2 million a year is Galchenyuk worth a 3rd?
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Galchenyuk, Alex (900 000 $ retained)
  2. Hållander, Filip
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Kreider, Chris (2 312 500 $ retained)
  2. McKegg, Greg
2.
NYR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Galchenyuk, Alex (2 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $77 774 800 $0 $7 045 000 $3 725 200 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 févr. 2020 à 11 h 44
#1
Leafs suck )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 344
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Probably Pittsburgh accepts if you take on all $4.9M
3 févr. 2020 à 11 h 46
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 139
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: ArizonaCoyotes
Probably Pittsburgh accepts if you take on all $4.9M


They are still saving 1.7 against the cap but if 900K is what it takes to get it done I don't see why they wouldn't do it.
3 févr. 2020 à 11 h 47
#3
Leafs suck )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 344
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: ashaw9377
They are still saving 1.7 against the cap but if 900K is what it takes to get it done I don't see why they wouldn't do it.

Because retaining while your giving more assets doesn’t make sense
3 févr. 2020 à 11 h 58
#4
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Id do this except if we are retaining you take out McKegg. Ill do 900k retention and only krieder with that retention or no retention on chucky and maybe McKegg
3 févr. 2020 à 12 h 0
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,705
Mentions "j'aime": 994
I don't see either team retaining salary. No need cap wise. The 1st and the prospect is exactly what the Rangers would want for Krieder. If taking on a UFA for a few months means getting their expected value I can see them doing this.
3 févr. 2020 à 12 h 8
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Galchenyuk get you a 3rd? lol
I mean honestly would I give up a 3rd for him. No. Any team paying for him is a playoff team. And I have to be real when I say this. If I'm a playoff team looking for help. He's not who I'm looking at, at this point.

I think he's a throw in for cap reasons on a "cost of doing business" at this point unless he's a pure hockey trade 1 for 1 with another guy who's gone bust up on another team.

As far as Kreider to the pens. I don't think it's a fit. I don't see them paying up on a 1 year rental.
He'd have to come with an extension for them to do this. They will probably not have a 1st for 2021. So my guess is they keep this years.
3 févr. 2020 à 12 h 10
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 139
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: bigZ98
Id do this except if we are retaining you take out McKegg. Ill do 900k retention and only krieder with that retention or no retention on chucky and maybe McKegg


I just figured McKegg could be a cheap 4th liner but if no interest there is no need to include him.
3 févr. 2020 à 12 h 15
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 139
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: pharrow
Galchenyuk get you a 3rd? lol
I mean honestly would I give up a 3rd for him. No. Any team paying for him is a playoff team. And I have to be real when I say this. If I'm a playoff team looking for help. He's not who I'm looking at, at this point.

I think he's a throw in for cap reasons on a "cost of doing business" at this point unless he's a pure hockey trade 1 for 1 with another guy who's gone bust up on another team.

As far as Kreider to the pens. I don't think it's a fit. I don't see them paying up on a 1 year rental.
He'd have to come with an extension for them to do this. They will probably not have a 1st for 2021. So my guess is they keep this years.


A 40 point player to a contender for a 3 isn't that outlandish, especially in this situation where they retain and he costs 2 million. I know he's having a down year but as far as pure rental options at that price tag its not a bad option.
3 févr. 2020 à 12 h 26
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: ashaw9377
A 40 point player to a contender for a 3 isn't that outlandish, especially in this situation where they retain and he costs 2 million. I know he's having a down year but as far as pure rental options at that price tag its not a bad option.


yeah him being a 40 point player seems like a decade away at this point.
I don't know who would bother. You add the bad play with a history of substance abuse. It says, find someone else.
I'm a pens fan and I'm saying this. I wouldn't touch him.
3 févr. 2020 à 13 h 9
#10
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Quoting: ashaw9377
I just figured McKegg could be a cheap 4th liner but if no interest there is no need to include him.


I think pens have enough depth to not have to trade for him
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage