SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Going the Rental Route

Créé par: jimmmyg
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 28 janv. 2020
Publié: 30 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Oookay so this is going to be one of my many attempts to play around with some ideas. I am still on the #TradeForZucker train but if he ends up costing more than we would like, these are some rental options.

TRADE #1
Granlund has been a fun player to watch for years now. He isn't having a great year and has 18pts through 43 games playing with some good centers, which is a situation we know pretty well. Galchenyuk has 16pts in 40 games and has been given opportunity to show his worth, but just isn't panning out. It certainly isn't for the lack of trying, but it is just not working. Both players are up for contracts this summer and could both benefit from a change. Maybe they both play better and get more $$$ in the summer. I think Granlund is the better player over the past 5 years included so they have to give up something more than just a player-for-player trade. Nashville sheds a little less than a million in case they want to make another trade and moves up 60 (approx) spots in this years draft.

TRADE #2
This is one I haven't given much thought until this morning (Thanks Eklund) but Vatanen can play in a Penguins foward-centric system and would push JJ out of the lineup. JJ probably can't be traded so having him as a depth D in case of injuries is best case scenario.

Let me know what you guys think
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Granlund, Mikael
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
Détails additionnels:
UFA at end of season if it doesn't work out. Low Risk - High Reward if he benefits from change of scenery.
NSH
  1. Galchenyuk, Alex
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
sheds 800k in salary in the case they are looking at another trade. Similar production in/out. Moves up 60 spots in draft selection.
2.
NJD
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NSH
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $74 361 625 $132 500 $3 832 500 $7 138 375 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 437 500 $2 437 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 janv. 2020 à 15 h 27
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
The penguins don't want Vatanen. Sure as hell wouldn't want that price either.
30 janv. 2020 à 15 h 47
#2
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
If we were gonna trade for granlund we should have done it before. Nash is still in a hunt for a WC spot and granlund may be turning it around under Hynes.
30 janv. 2020 à 15 h 58
#3
Démarrer sujet
jimmmyg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 737
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: bigZ98
If we were gonna trade for granlund we should have done it before. Nash is still in a hunt for a WC spot and granlund may be turning it around under Hynes.


Maybe, hope they both can turn it around. Just dependent on if Nashville is open to a change-of-scenery trade and willing to move up in the draft as a partial motivator. I think it would be smart to hold him and hope he turns into their own rental, but sometimes these GMs are antsy.
30 janv. 2020 à 15 h 59
#4
Démarrer sujet
jimmmyg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 737
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: pharrow
The penguins don't want Vatanen. Sure as hell wouldn't want that price either.


What don't you like about him? I always liked him in Anaheim. I don't really see the Penguins making a trade for a defenseman, but I would prefer to have more depth than Rikola & Ruhwedel in case of injury
30 janv. 2020 à 23 h 24
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: jimmmyg
What don't you like about him? I always liked him in Anaheim. I don't really see the Penguins making a trade for a defenseman, but I would prefer to have more depth than Rikola & Ruhwedel in case of injury


no team is giving up a 1st for depth pieces.
They have already put 11 million into LD. They paid out MP 4 million this season to be the 2LD behind Dumo. Why would they go out and pay a 1st for a guy who has no place there or be a 3LD when they need to find a top 6 RW.
They aren't wasting their time with this. And sure as hell not at that cost.
31 janv. 2020 à 13 h 9
#6
Démarrer sujet
jimmmyg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 737
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: pharrow
no team is giving up a 1st for depth pieces.
They have already put 11 million into LD. They paid out MP 4 million this season to be the 2LD behind Dumo. Why would they go out and pay a 1st for a guy who has no place there or be a 3LD when they need to find a top 6 RW.
They aren't wasting their time with this. And sure as hell not at that cost.


those are good points and is likely the correct way of going about TDL. I would personally like a depth D in case we lose two down the stretch so we don't have to rely on a JJ-Ruhwedel pairing but spending a 1st for a 3LD is something to avoid so I agree with you. You good to roll with our D for the rest of the season? They have proved they can hold it down just think this year is a good chance for them and want to make sure we have bandaids in case the inevitable injury(s) happens
31 janv. 2020 à 14 h 1
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: jimmmyg
those are good points and is likely the correct way of going about TDL. I would personally like a depth D in case we lose two down the stretch so we don't have to rely on a JJ-Ruhwedel pairing but spending a 1st for a 3LD is something to avoid so I agree with you. You good to roll with our D for the rest of the season? They have proved they can hold it down just think this year is a good chance for them and want to make sure we have bandaids in case the inevitable injury(s) happens


you can't do anything about injuries. Every team has them. You have to play through them. Every team has the same issues. I think they are lucky in they have a guy or two who is ok in WBS.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage