SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Oilers Deadline Moves

Créé par: Wilbur
Équipe: 2019-20 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2020
Publié: 26 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
CHI
  1. Gagner, Sam
  2. Khaira, Jujhar
  3. Manning, Brandon
  4. Räsänen, Aapeli [Liste de réserve]
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
3.
NJD
  1. Neal, James
  2. Niemeläinen, Markus [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
Future considerations
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 604 498 $0 $2 740 000 $2 895 502 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
808 333 $808 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
720 000 $720 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
720 000 $720 000 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
870 000 $870 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 janv. 2020 à 23 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,640
Mentions "j'aime": 2,513
I am an Oilers fan and all these teams will decline
27 janv. 2020 à 1 h 15
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 262
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: Copenhagen
I am an Oilers fan and all these teams will decline


It's simple to take it a face value and say that, sure. But hear me out.

1. The Saad trade moves out a poor performing $6 million player who is being outplayed by younger & cheeper players. So they save money and save further when they bury Gagner & Manning in the AHL and the following season they are gone and the Hawks don't have ineffective Saad on the payroll.

2. Granlund is in the same boat as Saad. He has simply not panned out as expected. Bringing Russell boosts the bottom pairing D who include Tinordi, Irwin and Weber. Russell is much more expensive, but he is also a much better player. Chiasson moves to 3RW and Arvidsson moves to 2RW.

3. Sure Neal is pricy and long-term, but he bolsters one of the worst PP units in the league. With Hughes and potentially Lafreniere, Neal brings a lot of potential value, for this season and in the future. Whereas Wood is a player NJ is rumoured to be very unhappy with.

I think these moves are quite possible
27 janv. 2020 à 1 h 28
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,640
Mentions "j'aime": 2,513
Quoting: Wilbur
It's simple to take it a face value and say that, sure. But hear me out.

1. The Saad trade moves out a poor performing $6 million player who is being outplayed by younger & cheeper players. So they save money and save further when they bury Gagner & Manning in the AHL and the following season they are gone and the Hawks don't have ineffective Saad on the payroll.

2. Granlund is in the same boat as Saad. He has simply not panned out as expected. Bringing Russell boosts the bottom pairing D who include Tinordi, Irwin and Weber. Russell is much more expensive, but he is also a much better player. Chiasson moves to 3RW and Arvidsson moves to 2RW.

3. Sure Neal is pricy and long-term, but he bolsters one of the worst PP units in the league. With Hughes and potentially Lafreniere, Neal brings a lot of potential value, for this season and in the future. Whereas Wood is a player NJ is rumoured to be very unhappy with.

I think these moves are quite possible


You are giving crap and more crap for these players in trades. What 6 million dollar guy is struggling. if its Saad you are talking about, if he wasnt injured he would be on pace for his 2nd best year to date goals wise with crap aging defensman. I would love to have Saad, but the value is not there to get him.

Nobody wants Neal, he is slow and his 5 on 5 play is horrible. Most of the game is still played 5 on 5

And moving out 2 cap dumps for Granlund aint going to happen, there is no picks or anything for a rebuilding team, they can just cover those positions with crappy UFA guys
27 janv. 2020 à 15 h 10
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,449
Mentions "j'aime": 2,962
Chaisson is of pretty much no interest to the Preds. Russell might be, with retention. Moving Granlund to fix that problem is... not ideal. It might end up going that way, if he's tanked his value that badly at the deadline, but it wouldn't be my first choice.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage