That's not happening. That's a move a title contender makes. Rangers are rebuilding.

Fox has made it very clear he only wants to play in New York

The sky's the limit for Chytil, especially when his game is so similar to Zibanejad's to keep learning from. Rangers keep Fox over DeAngelo, though they might keep both. Skjei has been playing very well against the other teams top lines and will not get traded as a salary dump.

I dont think either team would risk that trade but I will say it's interesting. A lot of talent going back and forth.

Pass for ANA. Downgrading in two positions.

U would legit have to be joking here

Nope, but we can always just disagree and you can keep your guys and we’ll keep ours.

Lol

Lindholm >>> Skjei
Rakell >> Chytil (right now)

So the question is, is the addition of potential superstar Adam Fox worth the downgrade at two positions?

I'm glad I don't have to make the decision and pull the trigger on that one. Nice challenge, @JokiharjuForNylanderLMAO !

Fox is a potential superstar? Could have fooled me with his terrible advanced analytics despite all those OFZ starts he’s getting. He’s another DeAngelo. Gets overhyped because he put up some points, but, when you look further into the detail, he’s getting heavily-sheltered. Don’t know how anyone can call a sheltered player a future superstar? I’m not directing this at you specifically, but NYR fans are overhyping this kid. At the moment, he’s on pace to be a top 4 OFD. His defensive game isn’t good enough for the top pairing.

I’d pass. Lindholm is a beast and still young enough to be big part of our future. I’d also keep Rakell for now. However, he’s moveable for a legit RHD with top pairing potential.

I agree with everything you say here and yes, I think Adam Fox is a potential superstar, with the emphasis on the word "potential." To put it another way, I'd rather have him than anyone we have in the system on the right side not named Manson.

Of course, but “superstar” has other connotations. I don’t view Fox as a potential elite top pairing D-man. More of a top 4 OFD. The latter, whilst a good player, isn’t a superstar, not even close.

Yeah, you're right. I should have said "star," not "superstar." I was trying to suggest his talent is roughly Carlo/Pulock level, not Hedman/Pietrangelo level.