SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2022 Team USA

Créé par: BuFfaLOFaN
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 20 janv. 2020
Publié: 20 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Turcotte, Zegras, Caufield...are long-shot prospects who aren't signed
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
4381 500 000 $192 536 857 $0 $7 932 500 $-111 036 857 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Below, Second Team
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Below, Second Team
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Below, Second Team
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
885 833 $885 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Islanders de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Below, Second Team
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Below, Second Team
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Below, Second Team
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 6

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 12
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
Batherson and Couturier are Canadian
Lights et BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 12
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,732
Mentions "j'aime": 1,381
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Batherson and Couturier are Canadian


The fact he'd be on the second team here is idiotic as well.
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 20
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: Lights
The fact he'd be on the second team here is idiotic as well.

Ur talking about Couts right? I like him a looot? but in 2 years would I take him over Brady? It's questionable, k don't think so...I'm betting Tkachuk will be a beast when he actually gets a good team / center
Lights a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 21
#4
Just making friends
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 76
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Batherson and Couturier are Canadian


The Foote brothers represent Canada as well
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 22
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: hunsburglar
The Foote brothers represent Canada as well


Thabks
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,732
Mentions "j'aime": 1,381
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Ur talking about Couts right? I like him a looot? but in 2 years would I take him over Brady? It's questionable, k don't think so...I'm betting Tkachuk will be a beast when he actually gets a good team / center


Oh ya Tkachuk is really good no doubt, I just think Couts would deserve it over Larkin. He'd be a nice complementary shut down C for this team kind of lacking defense on forwards imo.
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 49
#7
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Krug on the second team ??
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 51
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: Lights
Oh ya Tkachuk is really good no doubt, I just think Couts would deserve it over Larkin. He'd be a nice complementary shut down C for this team kind of lacking defense on forwards imo.


Larkin is soo good though.... But yea I agree, I'd put Couts over Larkin, Paciorrety as well. on the forward.side of things Eichels the best 2way imo, in current Roster
Lights a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 52
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: jcash08
Krug on the second team ??


Quoting: jcash08
Krug on the second team ??


Who would u put Krug over...in 2 years
20 janv. 2020 à 19 h 54
#10
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Who would u put Krug over...in 2 years


Slavin for sure, and probably Hughes
20 janv. 2020 à 20 h 15
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: jcash08
Slavin for sure, and probably Hughes


Gonna disagree with that Slavin and Hughes will certainly be better by then
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 20 h 24
#12
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Gonna disagree with that Slavin and Hughes will certainly be better by then


Slavin is already on his fifth season, and has been consistent playing the way he is.

Hughes could possibly be better in two years, but there is also a strong chnce that he is riding hot wtih a hot Vancouver team.

Krug has solidified him self as arguably the best powerplay quarter back in the league, while being a solid offensive defensman. And I don't see that changing over the next two seasons.
20 janv. 2020 à 20 h 32
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: jcash08
Slavin for sure, and probably Hughes


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Gonna disagree with that Slavin and Hughes will certainly be better by then


4 sure those 2 will be better, Slaving is better currently
20 janv. 2020 à 20 h 33
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: jcash08
Slavin is already on his fifth season, and has been consistent playing the way he is.

Hughes could possibly be better in two years, but there is also a strong chnce that he is riding hot wtih a hot Vancouver team.

Krug has solidified him self as arguably the best powerplay quarter back in the league, while being a solid offensive defensman. And I don't see that changing over the next two seasons.


Quoting: jcash08
Slavin is already on his fifth season, and has been consistent playing the way he is.

Hughes could possibly be better in two years, but there is also a strong chnce that he is riding hot wtih a hot Vancouver team.

Krug has solidified him self as arguably the best powerplay quarter back in the league, while being a solid offensive defensman. And I don't see that changing over the next two seasons.


Quoting: jcash08
Slavin is already on his fifth season, and has been consistent playing the way he is.

Hughes could possibly be better in two years, but there is also a strong chnce that he is riding hot wtih a hot Vancouver team.

Krug has solidified him self as arguably the best powerplay quarter back in the league, while being a solid offensive defensman. And I don't see that changing over the next two seasons.


Hughes will be the better powerplay qb...I mean he already is one of the best, and in 2 years his defense will be better than Keugs
20 janv. 2020 à 20 h 36
#15
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Hughes will be the better powerplay qb...I mean he already is one of the best, and in 2 years his defense will be better than Keugs


Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
4 sure those 2 will be better, Slaving is better currently


Like I said Hughes may possibly be better.

But i really hope you don't honestly think Slavin is better than Krug.
20 janv. 2020 à 20 h 36
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: jcash08
Slavin is already on his fifth season, and has been consistent playing the way he is.

Hughes could possibly be better in two years, but there is also a strong chnce that he is riding hot wtih a hot Vancouver team.

Krug has solidified him self as arguably the best powerplay quarter back in the league, while being a solid offensive defensman. And I don't see that changing over the next two seasons.


Slavin is a #1D that is very good on both sides of the ice. He doesnt get a lot of powerplay time as the Canes have Dougie and Gardiner already (he will now though) but has 23 ES points this season. He clocks heavy minutes on the PK as well.

If youve watched a single Vancouver game this ywar or even looked at the stats of their defense Hughes is a clear main contributor to thwir success and undisputed best defense on the team.

Krug is a great PP QB, best in the league? No way, that belongs to Carlson. Hes also not very good defensively
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
20 janv. 2020 à 20 h 52
#17
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Slavin is a #1D that is very good on both sides of the ice. He doesnt get a lot of powerplay time as the Canes have Dougie and Gardiner already (he will now though) but has 23 ES points this season. He clocks heavy minutes on the PK as well.

If youve watched a single Vancouver game this ywar or even looked at the stats of their defense Hughes is a clear main contributor to thwir success and undisputed best defense on the team.

Krug is a great PP QB, best in the league? No way, that belongs to Carlson. Hes also not very good defensively


IMO Slavin is not a #1 D. Hamilton is the #1 D on that team playing in all situations. Slavin slots in amongst the other good top 4 defenseman they have. His offensive abilities clearly aren't that good or he would be slotted with more PP time.

Hughes is a good offensive defenseman with room to grow. As I said. In two years he may be better than Krug but he now gets over 50% of his points on the PP. and As you said looking at the stats he's -8, and the third defenseman in TOI on Vancouver. So i wouldn't be running with saying he is by far their top defenseman.

As for Krug he has ran a top three powerplay in the NHL since 2013-14 (His rookie season). Therefore, as I said arguably the best powerplay quarter back in the league. He contributes heavily at even strengths and proved last season that he could shut down top lines as him and Carlo were matched against other teams top lines all last season in the playoffs.
20 janv. 2020 à 21 h 52
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: jcash08
IMO Slavin is not a #1 D. Hamilton is the #1 D on that team playing in all situations. Slavin slots in amongst the other good top 4 defenseman they have. His offensive abilities clearly aren't that good or he would be slotted with more PP time.

Hughes is a good offensive defenseman with room to grow. As I said. In two years he may be better than Krug but he now gets over 50% of his points on the PP. and As you said looking at the stats he's -8, and the third defenseman in TOI on Vancouver. So i wouldn't be running with saying he is by far their top defenseman.

As for Krug he has ran a top three powerplay in the NHL since 2013-14 (His rookie season). Therefore, as I said arguably the best powerplay quarter back in the league. He contributes heavily at even strengths and proved last season that he could shut down top lines as him and Carlo were matched against other teams top lines all last season in the playoffs.


The mindset that a team cant have more than 1 #1D is where you falter (ie Burns Karlsson, Dumba Suter, Heiskanen Klingberg) Slavin is overall the best defense on that team. Literally only last year of the last 5 years has Krug had a better GAR and WAR then Slavin.
20 janv. 2020 à 23 h 16
#19
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
The mindset that a team cant have more than 1 #1D is where you falter (ie Burns Karlsson, Dumba Suter, Heiskanen Klingberg) Slavin is overall the best defense on that team. Literally only last year of the last 5 years has Krug had a better GAR and WAR then Slavin.


I agree teams can have more than 1, #1 D. Nashville had three for years. Slavin is just not one of them. If he was a #1 D he would play in all situations. Not be left out for Gardiner on the PP. Any #1 D would play in all situations and he does not.
20 janv. 2020 à 23 h 24
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: jcash08
I agree teams can have more than 1, #1 D. Nashville had three for years. Slavin is just not one of them. If he was a #1 D he would play in all situations. Not be left out for Gardiner on the PP. Any #1 D would play in all situations and he does not.


Guess that means Krug isnt a #1D as he has less PK ice time then Slavin does PP time
20 janv. 2020 à 23 h 31
#21
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Guess that means Krug isnt a #1D as he has less PK ice time then Slavin does PP time


You are correct. He is not. But his offensive ability along with being reliable in his own end, is more valuable then Slavin being good defensively and mediocre offensively.
20 janv. 2020 à 23 h 37
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: jcash08
You are correct. He is not. But his offensive ability along with being reliable in his own end, is more valuable then Slavin being good defensively and mediocre offensively.


This is false, yes Krug is strong offensively but he is only mediocre in his own end at best. There is a reason he has a 69% oZone start. Yet still has 10 less ES points then Slavin on a higher scoring team
Your responses are clearly homer
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage