SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Saad comes home

Créé par: dgfresh78
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 30 déc. 2019
Publié: 30 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Almari, Niclas
  2. Galchenyuk, Alex
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
Détails additionnels:
Any team
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 624 125 $132 500 $3 832 500 $7 875 875 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 déc. 2019 à 21 h 6
#1
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Not close
30 déc. 2019 à 21 h 10
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,277
Mentions "j'aime": 507
Quoting: NickC1988
Not close


What do you think needs added
30 déc. 2019 à 21 h 12
#3
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Quoting: dgfresh78
What do you think needs added


Something of value. This trade is basically stealing from Chicago.
30 déc. 2019 à 21 h 16
#4
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,831
Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
Quoting: dgfresh78
What do you think needs added


Yeah it’s kinda trash.
30 déc. 2019 à 21 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Yeah, it is bad... $6M for Sa ad would instantly be the worst contract in Pittsburgh. Add $1.5M-$2M retention by Chicago with nothing added from Pittsburgh.

I have no desire to help Chicago unload their bad contracts.
TheGuyInTheChair a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2019 à 21 h 37
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 830
Mentions "j'aime": 716
Quoting: Yojimbo
Yeah, it is bad... $6M for Sa ad would instantly be the worst contract in Pittsburgh. Add $1.5M-$2M retention by Chicago with nothing added from Pittsburgh.

I have no desire to help Chicago unload their bad contracts.


Galchenyuk’s contract is good right now tho?

I’ve seen you **** on Saad countless times on this site. It is always clear to me you are providing your opinion on a player you NEVER watch.
30 déc. 2019 à 21 h 47
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: NickC1988
Not close


Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Yeah it’s kinda trash.


I say a first and Jugs could get it done. Or maybe POJ
30 déc. 2019 à 21 h 49
#8
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Quoting: mhockey91
I say a first and Jugs could get it done. Or maybe POJ


First and Galchenyuk is what I've been using and it goes over fairly well.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2019 à 22 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: NickC1988
First and Galchenyuk is what I've been using and it goes over fairly well.


Saads game would fit in nicely in pit
31 déc. 2019 à 8 h 9
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,277
Mentions "j'aime": 507
Quoting: Yojimbo
Yeah, it is bad... $6M for Sa ad would instantly be the worst contract in Pittsburgh. Add $1.5M-$2M retention by Chicago with nothing added from Pittsburgh.

I have no desire to help Chicago unload their bad contracts.


I don’t see how you think getting Saad is a bad thing because he’s great in pretty much every metric. He’d fit in perfectly with Crosby or Malkin. Plus it’s not helping Chicago since they already helped themselves with the seabrook injury.
1 janv. 2020 à 18 h 39
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: TheJonSnow
Galchenyuk’s contract is good right now tho?


Did I saw that? Did I even hit at that? No and no. Saying player A's contract would be the worst does not in any way mean that another player's contract is "good". Like, not even by an extreme stretch. How did you come with 2 + 2 equals green olives? However Galchenyuk’s contract is $1.1M less and ends this year. Less cap hit and less term. Galchenyuk is playing worse, but his contract is not as bad as of right now.


Quoting: TheJonSnow
I’ve seen you **** on Saad countless times on this site. It is always clear to me you are providing your opinion on a player you NEVER watch.


Or I do watch him and he is not very impressive, especially for $6M hit.
1 janv. 2020 à 18 h 43
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: dgfresh78
I don’t see how you think getting Saad is a bad thing because he’s great in pretty much every metric. He’d fit in perfectly with Crosby or Malkin. Plus it’s not helping Chicago since they already helped themselves with the seabrook injury.


Looking just at advanced stats is flawed. Aren't Simon's advanced stats like All-Star-ish or something.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage