SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Change is good

Créé par: Eli
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 19 déc. 2019
Publié: 19 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This season is not over. Make some trades today that could turn it around. Jones has been a top ten goalie, but the Sharks have imploded. Is the the problem, or can he still shine behind a different defense? Panik got 44 points in his last year in Chicago, but he and Eller aren't clicking on a checking line. Maybe Toews gets him going.

Plan on re-signing Lehner, long term, but only if he can show he's better than Jones, down the stretch. Make this trade early, so if Jones earns the job, the Hawks can still trade Lehner at the deadline.

I tried to build four even lines and three decent pairs on defense. If you'd make different lines, post your lines? If nothing else, I got some draft picks for guys likely to be traded, and I made trades the other teams should accept.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Jones, Martin
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Pánik, Richard
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (WSH)
3.
CHI
  1. Sbisa, Luca
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de WSH
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 646 686 $0 $7 665 000 $14 853 314 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 déc. 2019 à 7 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,240
Mentions "j'aime": 19,508
Sharks take that in a heartbeat, gives them the chance to play Goalie roulette next year
Eli et Hawksince71 a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2019 à 7 h 47
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Sharks take that in a heartbeat, gives them the chance to play Goalie roulette next year


Agreed. There's zero chance the Hawks take on Jones's contract unless insane prospects are coming with. Merkely alone wouldn't be enough. 5 year's $5.75M for a backup is ridiculous.
19 déc. 2019 à 7 h 54
#3
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Sharks take that in a heartbeat, gives them the chance to play Goalie roulette next year


Yep. Sharks might even add a bit, because Crow is having a better year than Jones.
Hawksince71 a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2019 à 9 h 59
#4
More To Come
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,560
Mentions "j'aime": 371
Quoting: exo2769
Agreed. There's zero chance the Hawks take on Jones's contract unless insane prospects are coming with. Merkely alone wouldn't be enough. 5 year's $5.75M for a backup is ridiculous.


Merkley is not being traded for an aging, oft injured goalie on the back 9 of his career...not even remotely considerable.

Idk why his idiot is trading Jones, Jones is untradeable with his contract. I’d much rather keep Jones and Merkley then take Crawford. I don’t mean this offensively, this trade shouldn’t exist at all.
19 déc. 2019 à 10 h 5
#5
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Eklund
Merkley is not being traded for an aging, oft injured goalie on the back 9 of his career...not even remotely considerable.

Idk why his idiot is trading Jones, Jones is untradeable with his contract. I’d much rather keep Jones and Merkley then take Crawford. I don’t mean this offensively, this trade shouldn’t exist at all.


Yeah, Merkley seems high, given that Jones might bounce back, but adding something to move Jones' contract seems reasonable, and renting a future Hall of Fame goalie to climb four spots in the wild card race seems reasonable. Would you add Merkley for Lehner?
19 déc. 2019 à 10 h 16
#6
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: Eklund
Merkley is not being traded for an aging, oft injured goalie on the back 9 of his career...not even remotely considerable.

Idk why his idiot is trading Jones, Jones is untradeable with his contract. I’d much rather keep Jones and Merkley then take Crawford. I don’t mean this offensively, this trade shouldn’t exist at all.


It's not for an aging goalie. It's shedding a $5.75M Jones. That's what his value is now. I 100% agree with you that this trade should NOT exist and 100% agree with you that SJ should keep Jones. He has negative value right now, but since it's THAT bad...and it is that bad...if you want to dump him then it would be an insane cost today.

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/j/jonesma02.html

GSAA of -22.87 and -16.21 for the past 2 years. He's terrible.
Eli et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2019 à 10 h 26
#7
More To Come
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,560
Mentions "j'aime": 371
Quoting: exo2769
It's not for an aging goalie. It's shedding a $5.75M Jones. That's what his value is now. I 100% agree with you that this trade should NOT exist and 100% agree with you that SJ should keep Jones. He has negative value right now, but since it's THAT bad...and it is that bad...if you want to dump him then it would be an insane cost today.

https://www.hockey-reference.com/players/j/jonesma02.html

GSAA of -22.87 and -16.21 for the past 2 years. He's terrible.

You misread my point, obviously. I said I wouldn’t trade Merkley for Crawford. I don’t care about Jones because he is not moveable. Merkley is a top offensive defenseman prospect and he is worth wayyyy more than Crow coming off major concussions and 34 years old. Not. Even. Close.
19 déc. 2019 à 10 h 31
#8
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: Eklund
You misread my point, obviously. I said I wouldn’t trade Merkley for Crawford. I don’t care about Jones because he is not moveable. Merkley is a top offensive defenseman prospect and he is worth wayyyy more than Crow coming off major concussions and 34 years old. Not. Even. Close.


No, I heard you. You think the biggest piece of this trade is Merkley and wouldn't trade him for Crow. The reality is...those 2 guys are the smaller pieces in this trade. This biggest piece in this hypothetical trade has negative value...it's Martin Jones' contract. You're not even mentioning his value. The real question is...what else does SJ need to send in order to dump Martin Jones 5 more years at $5.75M of being literally the worst goalie in the NHL. Hawks don't have the space and wouldn't even do it for Merkley.
Eli et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2019 à 10 h 34
#9
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: exo2769
No, I heard you. You think the biggest piece of this trade is Merkley and wouldn't trade him for Crow. The reality is...those 2 guys are the smaller pieces in this trade. This biggest piece in this hypothetical trade has negative value...it's Martin Jones' contract. You're not even mentioning him. The real question is...what else does SJ need to send in order to dump Martin Jones 5 more years at $5.75M of being literally the worst goalie in the NHL. Hawks don't have the space and wouldn't even do it for Merkley.


^correct. And it isn't close, the way Jones is playing this year and last year, ever since the Sharks picked up Karlsson. But on a team without Karlsson, taking on Jones for Merkley might present an interesting gamble. Because Jones used to be good, and might get good again, at what would then turn into a fair price, and the Hawks have nothing more to play for this year.
19 déc. 2019 à 10 h 36
#10
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
Quoting: Eli
^correct. And it isn't close, the way Jones is playing this year and last year, ever since the Sharks picked up Karlsson. But on a team without Karlsson, taking on Jones for Merkley might present an interesting gamble. Because Jones used to be good, and might get good again, at what would then turn into a fair price, and the Hawks have nothing more to play for this year.


This is interesting. Sending BOTH Jones and Merkley to a team with plenty of cap. Stevie Y might do it. He's on a pure tank mission anyway.
Eli a aimé ceci.
19 déc. 2019 à 11 h 34
#11
Démarrer sujet
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: exo2769
This is interesting. Sending BOTH Jones and Merkley to a team with plenty of cap. Stevie Y might do it. He's on a pure tank mission anyway.


Yeah, and the Sharks could throw in a 3rd for Bernier. But I think they'd be better off throwing in a 2nd for Crow, if he's up for helping Thornton, Marleau, and Burns push for the playoffs.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage