SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Johnsson gone - and a backup

Créé par: higgs31
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 11 déc. 2019
Publié: 11 déc. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Move Ceci to have the cap space and available spot on D

Johnsson for Miller
- Leafs need to replace Ceci with a better RHd
- Miller has been good but a healthy scratch on Buffalo as they have too many NHL calibre dmen
- Johnsson making too much for the way he's played this year, being outplayed by guys like Petan, Engvall, Mikheyev, who all make much less
- Buffalo wants forwards and are openly shopping a defencemen

Opening up cap space also allows Leafs to call up healthy scratches and set a rotation in place with guys like Moore, Engvall, Aberg, Spezza, Petan, Gauthier

Unrelated to cap space issues but I would really like the Leafs to acquire Alexander Georgiev for preferably draft picks. Rangers likely to call up Igor Shestyorkin at some point this season and give him a solid look, Georgiev could be moved for a good return for them
Transactions
1.
TOR
    Trade Ceci to wherever for whatever
    2.
    TOR
    1. Miller, Colin
    Détails additionnels:
    Buffalo needs forwards and Miller has been a healthy scratch far too many times as they have too many NHL calibre defencemen
    BUF
    1. Johnsson, Andreas
    Détails additionnels:
    Buffalo already has too many dmen and are up against the cap so they couldn't take Ceci
    3.
    NYR
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de COL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de STL
    Logo de WPG
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $79 770 199 $0 $132 500 $1 729 801 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C, AD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    675 000 $675 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    675 000 $675 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    11 déc. 2019 à 0 h 40
    #1
    Just Keep Swimming
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 9,218
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,582
    "Johnsson making too much for the way he's played this year, being outplayed by guys like Petan, Engvall, Mikheyev, who all make much less"

    Your eye test ****ing sucks
    GenXHockey et Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2019 à 0 h 45
    #2
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 21,157
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
    Quoting: Random2152
    "Johnsson making too much for the way he's played this year, being outplayed by guys like Petan, Engvall, Mikheyev, who all make much less"

    Your eye test ****ing sucks


    What in the actual ****???? Being out played by Petan lmfao. Has this guy ever watched a hockey game?

    You can make an argument for mikheyev but I still think Johnsson has been better.

    OP’s biggest complaint... Johnsson did nothing tonight against the Nucks...
    Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2019 à 1 h 15
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
    Fair trade that can help both teams, of course, Kapanen would be a more interesting option due to the fact that he is RW and right-handed, but Johnsson also suitable.
    GMTD a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2019 à 1 h 25
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 4,002
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
    Quoting: Random2152
    "Johnsson making too much for the way he's played this year, being outplayed by guys like Petan, Engvall, Mikheyev, who all make much less"

    Your eye test ****ing sucks


    Quoting: Jamiepo
    What in the actual ****???? Being out played by Petan lmfao. Has this guy ever watched a hockey game?

    You can make an argument for mikheyev but I still think Johnsson has been better.

    OP’s biggest complaint... Johnsson did nothing tonight against the Nucks...


    You're both spot on. But let me make sure I got this right...is the OP actually suggesting that we trade Mango to make room for Aberg and Petan??? Because last time I checked Moore, Engvall and Spezza already have a spot/role on this team and goat is what he is a 12-13th forward....nothing special but is still a somewhat useful player.
    11 déc. 2019 à 1 h 26
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 4,002
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
    Quoting: SalamiCheese
    Fair trade that can help both teams, of course, Kapanen would be a more interesting option due to the fact that he is RW and right-handed, but Johnsson also suitable.


    If your definition of fair is lopsided then I agree.
    11 déc. 2019 à 1 h 48
    #6
    AJC13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 1,313
    Mentions "j'aime": 272
    Georgiev is a number one goalie, not a back up. Teams needing a number one goalie might give up more in trade than a 2nd and 3rd round pick. If no teams in the playoff picture need a number one goalie, then NYR might(?) settle for the offer you're suggesting or hold on to Georgiev. Toronto might want to target a backup goalie which would cost less in trade. Rangers have given up the leagues most shots on goal against and if not for Georgiev and Lundqvist both playing like number one goalies, NYR would be completely out of the playoff picture.
    11 déc. 2019 à 2 h 2
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
    Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
    If your definition of fair is lopsided then I agree.


    Where is it one-sided? Miller now is not a healthy scratch and plays well, Johnsson is still a guy with one season at 43 points, who seems to have played in a with Matthews last season. For me It’s a fair deal.
    GMTD a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2019 à 9 h 14
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,797
    Mentions "j'aime": 564
    Quoting: Jamiepo
    What in the actual ****???? Being out played by Petan lmfao. Has this guy ever watched a hockey game?

    You can make an argument for mikheyev but I still think Johnsson has been better.

    OP’s biggest complaint... Johnsson did nothing tonight against the Nucks...


    He was invisible out there. He better pick it up soon or I'm hoping Dubas makes this trade!
    GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2019 à 10 h 43
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 256
    Mentions "j'aime": 155
    Quoting: Sign_em_up000000
    You're both spot on. But let me make sure I got this right...is the OP actually suggesting that we trade Mango to make room for Aberg and Petan??? Because last time I checked Moore, Engvall and Spezza already have a spot/role on this team and goat is what he is a 12-13th forward....nothing special but is still a somewhat useful player.


    no, you trade Johnsson to get better on defence, that's the whole point of the ACGM. I'm saying moving Johnsson for a defenceman would open up a spot for cheap players who've looked good to get an elevated role in the lineup. Leafs don't need to have full lines stay together, there's three duos: Matthews - Nylander, Tavares - Marner, Kerfoot - Kapanen. guys like Hyman, Engvall, Moore, Petan, Engvall can all play LW and play their role well on any of the 4 lines. I may be incorrect in saying Johnsson is overpaid for his performance but I believe I'm in the majority who would rather pay his money to an actually good RHD instead of Ceci
    11 déc. 2019 à 10 h 45
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 256
    Mentions "j'aime": 155
    Quoting: Random2152
    "Johnsson making too much for the way he's played this year, being outplayed by guys like Petan, Engvall, Mikheyev, who all make much less"

    Your eye test ****ing sucks


    Quoting: Jamiepo
    What in the actual ****???? Being out played by Petan lmfao. Has this guy ever watched a hockey game?

    You can make an argument for mikheyev but I still think Johnsson has been better.

    OP’s biggest complaint... Johnsson did nothing tonight against the Nucks...


    please refer to my response to Sign_em_up000000
    11 déc. 2019 à 10 h 49
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 256
    Mentions "j'aime": 155
    Quoting: SalamiCheese
    Fair trade that can help both teams, of course, Kapanen would be a more interesting option due to the fact that he is RW and right-handed, but Johnsson also suitable.


    agree but I think for that reason Kapanen is more valuable and Buffalo would need to add. I also think Kapanen has been a better fit on his line with Kerfoot and Mikheyev than Johnsson has been on his line
    SalamiCheese a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2019 à 10 h 54
    #12
    Formerly Jamiepo
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 21,157
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
    Quoting: SalamiCheese
    Where is it one-sided? Miller now is not a healthy scratch and plays well, Johnsson is still a guy with one season at 43 points, who seems to have played in a with Matthews last season. For me It’s a fair deal.


    PSA

    https://youtu.be/wXZetxpQmLg

    Johnsson is good and not carried by anyone. That “one 43 point season” was his rookie year and no he was not with Matthews for the entire season. He was also on pace to put up another season over 40 points before he was injured blocking a shot.

    Miller is lousy top 4 or a good bottom pair Dman. Does not get you our best LW.

    I would be furious if dubas made this trade.
    Sign_em_up000000 et CD282 a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2019 à 10 h 57
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
    Quoting: Jamiepo
    PSA

    https://youtu.be/wXZetxpQmLg

    Johnsson is good and not carried by anyone. That “one 43 point season” was his rookie year and no he was not with Matthews for the entire season. He was also on pace to put up another season over 40 points before he was injured blocking a shot.

    Miller is lousy top 4 or a good bottom pair Dman. Does not get you our best LW.

    I would be furious if dubas made this trade.


    And what was the rookie season? He is at the same pace this season, he is not a guy with 60+ points, at least for now. Miller can be solid #5 or #4, he doesn’t play the minutes of the third pair now, apparently you don’t watch the Buffalo game, so it's hard for you to estimate this.
    GMTD a aimé ceci.
    11 déc. 2019 à 17 h 20
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 4,002
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
    Quoting: higgs31
    no, you trade Johnsson to get better on defence, that's the whole point of the ACGM. I'm saying moving Johnsson for a defenceman would open up a spot for cheap players who've looked good to get an elevated role in the lineup. Leafs don't need to have full lines stay together, there's three duos: Matthews - Nylander, Tavares - Marner, Kerfoot - Kapanen. guys like Hyman, Engvall, Moore, Petan, Engvall can all play LW and play their role well on any of the 4 lines. I may be incorrect in saying Johnsson is overpaid for his performance but I believe I'm in the majority who would rather pay his money to an actually good RHD instead of Ceci


    It's one thing to trade him for D help which I wouldn't be opposed to IF it was for a nice upgrade on the back-end....sadly this is not. Your reasoning for trading him is to find an upgrade on Ceci? Why? He's here for one year than we get the cap space to improve our team through FA while being able to keep Johnsson. If we can't find an upgrade through FA then I agree we need to scour the trade market to see what's out there but not right now.

    I get your idea is to create more minutes or bigger roles for some on the roster who deserve it...but what happens when one or more of them get injured and we don't have good enough replacements? Depth is always important, more so on a hopeful contender especially if this is a lost year which it very well could be meaning we can't afford to have another disappointing season again.

    If you're going to trade Jonsson for D help...aim higher or just keep him. This trade does not improve the Leafs but it does improve a division rival.
    11 déc. 2019 à 17 h 21
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 4,002
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,584
    Quoting: Jamiepo
    PSA

    https://youtu.be/wXZetxpQmLg

    Johnsson is good and not carried by anyone. That “one 43 point season” was his rookie year and no he was not with Matthews for the entire season. He was also on pace to put up another season over 40 points before he was injured blocking a shot.

    Miller is lousy top 4 or a good bottom pair Dman. Does not get you our best LW.

    I would be furious if dubas made this trade.


    Dubas should be fired if he made this trade.
    11 déc. 2019 à 17 h 36
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,003
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
    Johnsson for Miller is lopsided, no question. If you're looking to trade Johnsson for defense I'm positive you can get a better deal. Miller is Barrie-lite, not at ALL what Toronto needs.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage