SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

hockey is for everyone

Créé par: Marincin_memes
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 27 nov. 2019
Publié: 27 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
wonder when the term "hockey is for everyone" will actually mean, hockey is for everyone. if your boss called you a racial slur a homophobic slur, singled you out and embarrassed you in front of your superiors, if your boss kicks you in the head, if your boss manipulates and deceives you, you know like quit, press charges, hate that person forever. how come, if this happens to an NHL player, the tides are automatically different . how come Don Cherry is able to be xenophobic, how come Bill Peters is able to be racist, how come Mike Babcock is able to be deceiving and manipulative, and how come sticking up for your self, like any normal human being would do, makes you a snowflake p*****. this is what's wrong with hockey culture. players need to keep stepping up for themselves, everyone should. if this league whats respect, racism, xenophobia, homophobia, manipulation, and caption, among other things, need to go.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2881 500 000 $95 764 643 $0 $202 500 $-14 264 643 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
694 444 $694 444 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 nov. 2019 à 1 h 50
#26
Molson beer is meh
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 3,815
Mentions "j'aime": 1,734
Modifié 28 nov. 2019 à 2 h 16
Quoting: oneX
If hockey (particularly the NHL) wants to become a global sports league, people at NHL HQ need to wake up and realize it's 2019 and not 1970.

In the 90's I remember the NHL and NBA were head to head in revenues and ratings. It's not even close anymore and if I have to type out why the NBA has pulled away from the NHL, then the persons reading this won't ever understand my point.


I remember the complete opposite.... The NBA in the 90s is arguably their golden age. NHL in the 90s (known as the dead puck era) was on a downward trend coming out of the amazing 80s....NHL really didn't pick itself back up until 2005 after the lockout.
28 nov. 2019 à 2 h 26
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 938
Mentions "j'aime": 253
I think there's a big difference between what Peters did using slurs and what Babcock did to Marner.

The Babcock controversy reminds me of the moral dilemma in the film Whiplash. The big question is, can coaches (or teachers, or parents) push players out of their comfort zone, "break" them, to get the best of their potential? In some cases, someone doing that to you can have positive effects in the long run. I don't like this psychological exercise myself, but is it worse than shouting at the player in the dressing room? It's more difficult to judge than what people think.

The racial slurs, on the other hand, have no place whatsoever from a coach. This case is completely different.

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad we changed the coach in Toronto, and players are much better off with Keefe. Just saying, the three cases mentioned in the post are not a trend. They're distinct incidents without the same implications.
28 nov. 2019 à 9 h 31
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,770
Mentions "j'aime": 2,619
Quoting: leaflet
I think there's a big difference between what Peters did using slurs and what Babcock did to Marner.

The Babcock controversy reminds me of the moral dilemma in the film Whiplash. The big question is, can coaches (or teachers, or parents) push players out of their comfort zone, "break" them, to get the best of their potential? In some cases, someone doing that to you can have positive effects in the long run. I don't like this psychological exercise myself, but is it worse than shouting at the player in the dressing room? It's more difficult to judge than what people think.

The racial slurs, on the other hand, have no place whatsoever from a coach. This case is completely different.

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad we changed the coach in Toronto, and players are much better off with Keefe. Just saying, the three cases mentioned in the post are not a trend. They're distinct incidents without the same implications.


And how do feel about what Babcock did with Marner and on top of that being mental health advocate?

Yeah things don't just need to change in one aspect of this...It's easily more than one aspect.
28 nov. 2019 à 13 h 33
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,132
Mentions "j'aime": 1,540
Quoting: Jamiepo
If you have to ask, you probably aren’t included.


Lol! What??

It's not rolling back to the 1970s. I love this back in my day, give "us" our game back, get off my lawn crap.

Everything has a shelf life including a way of doing things. The Don Cherry's, the Peters', the Babcock's way of doing things isn't tolerated anymore. They can sit back and sulk about how back in their day things were better until "you people" started doing things differently. That's fine they can be sensitive about their stuff all they want. But they'll get passed by like all dinosaurs do.

Brindamour said it best the other day. The gap in the power structure between a player/coach/ gm has been too large, that this dynamic is changing, players have more power, and more stories will come out - because fans and society doesn't tolerate this stuff.

It's simple, don't be an assh*le and there's nothing to worry about. Treat someone like sh*t and there's accountability now. That's a bad thing for "us"? .. lol. F'ing ridiculous take, Po.
oneX et BlastnyFromThePastny a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage