SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

best plyr on every team

Créé par: kopiino
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 17 nov. 2019
Publié: 17 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3181 500 000 $177 068 684 $0 $792 500 $-95 568 684 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 538 462 $9 538 462 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Islanders de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
745 000 $745 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance360 000 $$360K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 nov. 2019 à 12 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Do you mean as in based off their expectations? Savard, Hammer, Walker, etc.. are most definitely not the best players on their teams
17 nov. 2019 à 12 h 41
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
I will argue that Pasta has been better than Marchand, this year at least, and I've barely even heard of Sean Walker lmao, that's how irrelevant the kings are (plus Miller has been better than Boesser this year imo)
17 nov. 2019 à 12 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: mhockey91
Do you mean as in based off their expectations? Savard, Hammer, Walker, etc.. are most definitely not the best players on their teams


savard is easily the best player on the blue jackets
hjalmarsson is the best dfd in the league and could be considered at top 10 D
walker is the only player id even consider to be good on the kings bar clifford
17 nov. 2019 à 12 h 45
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: kopiino
savard is easily the best player on the blue jackets
hjalmarsson is the best dfd in the league and could be considered at top 10 D
walker is the only player id even consider to be good on the kings bar clifford


Are you trolling?

Wait yes you must be lol
17 nov. 2019 à 12 h 48
#5
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: mhockey91
Are you trolling?

Wait yes you must be lol


sorry you have shid agendas!!!
17 nov. 2019 à 12 h 53
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: kopiino
sorry you have shid agendas!!!


If you seriously think any of those things you said, you shouldn’t be on this site. That’s the worst takes I think I’ve ever read on here.
17 nov. 2019 à 12 h 55
#7
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: mhockey91
If you seriously think any of those things you said, you shouldn’t be on this site. That’s the worst takes I think I’ve ever read on here.


pretty ironic coming from you

who is better than hjalmarsson and savard. enlighten me
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 5
#8
I put math in hockey
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 624
Mentions "j'aime": 167
This is a good list. I like this list. Good job.

Disagreements: I like Nylander as much as the next guy (well, I guess unless you're the next guy) but he isn't better than Matthews. He defends better, but Matthews provides a lot more offence thanks in part to his elite shot, along with just generally generating more chances than Nylander by most models. He is better.

Pettersson is really, really, really good. He would be Toronto's best player if he keeps up his pace from his rookie season. Like, he could possibly make the Death Incarnate line better good. Boeser's good, but he isn't that good.

There's definitely a decent argument for Hammer as Arizona's best skater, even with his utter lack of offense. I wouldn't put him as a top-10 D in the league just because of how little he provides on offence or in transition, but he is really good. Thing is, Raanta and Kuemper have both put their names in the convo for best goalie in the league (Raanta whenever he's not injured). I'd probably have at least one if not both ahead of Hjalmarsson, good as he is.

Savard's numbers this year have actually been a lot better than I was expecting when I looked him up. PLD's still 2.5 GAR ahead of him though.

I love the Sean Walker inclusion, he's been on an absolutely insane tear to start this year. Is it sustainable? No idea, but holy crap has he been good.

Well-made list. Points for having one in there I thought was wrong off the cuff but realized was right after I looked it up a bit.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 13
#9
I put math in hockey
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 624
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Quoting: kopiino
savard is easily the best player on the blue jackets
hjalmarsson is the best dfd in the league and could be considered at top 10 D
walker is the only player id even consider to be good on the kings bar clifford


So far this season Savard ranks 9th on the Jackets in goals above replacement, behind PLD, Nash, Emil Bemstrom, Murray, Bjorkstrand, Foligno, Lilja and Werenski.

Hjalmarsson is probably the best Dfd in the league, but he's well below replacement level on offence. I would call him top-10 just yet. His total GAR over the last few years is only 7.5, not particularly elite. His GAR/60 isn't much better.

Walker point is fair.
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: kopiino
pretty ironic coming from you

who is better than hjalmarsson and savard. enlighten me


Ummm. Kessel, Keller, OEL, Schmaltz, etc.. looool

And PLD/ Jones EASILY way better than savard. Nylander also most definitely isn’t better than Tavares / marner / matthews. Scheifele over Morrisey, etc... I can pick apart most of your list other than the obvious ones
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 16
#11
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: The_Ultimate_Pielord
This is a good list. I like this list. Good job.

Disagreements: I like Nylander as much as the next guy (well, I guess unless you're the next guy) but he isn't better than Matthews. He defends better, but Matthews provides a lot more offence thanks in part to his elite shot, along with just generally generating more chances than Nylander by most models. He is better.

Pettersson is really, really, really good. He would be Toronto's best player if he keeps up his pace from his rookie season. Like, he could possibly make the Death Incarnate line better good. Boeser's good, but he isn't that good.

There's definitely a decent argument for Hammer as Arizona's best skater, even with his utter lack of offense. I wouldn't put him as a top-10 D in the league just because of how little he provides on offence or in transition, but he is really good. Thing is, Raanta and Kuemper have both put their names in the convo for best goalie in the league (Raanta whenever he's not injured). I'd probably have at least one if not both ahead of Hjalmarsson, good as he is.

Savard's numbers this year have actually been a lot better than I was expecting when I looked him up. PLD's still 2.5 GAR ahead of him though.

I love the Sean Walker inclusion, he's been on an absolutely insane tear to start this year. Is it sustainable? No idea, but holy crap has he been good.

Well-made list. Points for having one in there I thought was wrong off the cuff but realized was right after I looked it up a bit.


highly doubt walker is sustainable lmao, but like, LA is just a trash team all around and i feel theres no real "right" answer for them.

savard actually has a better 2016-19 GAR than PLD. i think the only thing that changes when you factor in their GAR totals for this season in that is that PLD has a slightly better EVO GAR, but savards EVD GAR is so much better (i think by about 16)

arizona is weird, i had raanta over hammer last year, but injuries are weird and goalies are also weird. id def say that he, kuemper, and raanta are arizonas top-3 players

and shhhhh, just let me believe nylander is better (do i even think he is? i dont know) in peace
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 17
#12
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: mhockey91
Ummm. Kessel, Keller, OEL, Schmaltz, etc.. looool

And PLD/ Jones EASILY way better than savard. Nylander also most definitely isn’t better than Tavares / marner / matthews. Scheifele over Morrisey, etc... I can pick apart most of your list other than the obvious ones


jones isnt even a top pairing defenseman, PLD is the only fair argument. nylander is better than marner and probably tavares.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 19
#13
I put math in hockey
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 624
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Quoting: mhockey91
Ummm. Kessel, Keller, OEL, Schmaltz, etc.. looool

And PLD/ Jones EASILY way better than savard. Nylander also most definitely isn’t better than Tavares / marner / matthews. Scheifele over Morrisey, etc... I can pick apart most of your list other than the obvious ones


Amusingly, despite Hammer only ranking 8th on the Coyotes in GAR from the start of the last year, you didn't manage to name any of the players ahead of him. Savard's GAR this season is actually 0.2 ahead of Jones. Nylander's been significantly better than Marner at evens for their entire careers (less so when compared to AM/JT).

Not sure how I missed the Schiefele point. You got me there.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 20
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: kopiino
jones isnt even a top pairing defenseman, PLD is the only fair argument. nylander is better than marner and probably tavares.


Jones?? Are you serious. And nylander most definitely isn’t better. I like analytics a lot, but you can’t base all your arguments off of them and I feel like that’s what you’re doing with this list. It’s a combination of points, eye test, analytics, etc... to draw conclusions on players.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 20
#15
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: mhockey91
Ummm. Kessel, Keller, OEL, Schmaltz, etc.. looool

And PLD/ Jones EASILY way better than savard. Nylander also most definitely isn’t better than Tavares / marner / matthews. Scheifele over Morrisey, etc... I can pick apart most of your list other than the obvious ones


forgot about schiefele my b
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 21
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: kopiino
jones isnt even a top pairing defenseman, PLD is the only fair argument. nylander is better than marner and probably tavares.


Bro are you dumb Jones is a top 5 top 10 d man lmao stfu
mhockey91 a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 24
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: The_Ultimate_Pielord
Amusingly, despite Hammer only ranking 8th on the Coyotes in GAR from the start of the last year, you didn't manage to name any of the players ahead of him. Savard's GAR this season is actually 0.2 ahead of Jones. Nylander's been significantly better than Marner at evens for their entire careers (less so when compared to AM/JT).

Not sure how I missed the Schiefele point. You got me there.


GAR is a bad Advance stat. Jack Johnson has one of the best GAR on Pittsburgh. Defend that one. Analytics aren’t everything. They’re a great tool, but so is common sense. You’re over thinking this

https://twitter.com/gunnerstaal/status/1192556564353302528?s=21

https://twitter.com/gunnerstaal/status/1131903178109325312?s=21
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 24
#18
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: mhockey91
Jones?? Are you serious. And nylander most definitely isn’t better. I like analytics a lot, but you can’t base all your arguments off of them and I feel like that’s what you’re doing with this list. It’s a combination of points, eye test, analytics, etc... to draw conclusions on players.


jones has a n 11.6 GAR 2016-19 with a -0.9 EVD

savard also has a higher 2016-19 xGA/60 and xGF/60

jones is very overrated.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 24
#19
I put math in hockey
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 624
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Quoting: kopiino
highly doubt walker is sustainable lmao, but like, LA is just a trash team all around and i feel theres no real "right" answer for them.

savard actually has a better 2016-19 GAR than PLD. i think the only thing that changes when you factor in their GAR totals for this season in that is that PLD has a slightly better EVO GAR, but savards EVD GAR is so much better (i think by about 16)

arizona is weird, i had raanta over hammer last year, but injuries are weird and goalies are also weird. id def say that he, kuemper, and raanta are arizonas top-3 players

and shhhhh, just let me believe nylander is better (do i even think he is? i dont know) in peace


Damn, I have been sleeping on David Savard. Those are some nice numbers.

Still, he's only got an edge of 0.5 GAR with 2 thousand more minutes of TOI in the timeframe on PLD. I'm willing to bet PLD'd be higher if the TOI were even.

Respect the refusal to evaluate goalies. Richardson's been sneakily really good for the Coyotes as well, though.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 25
#20
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: mhockey91
GAR is a horrible analytic. Jack Johnson has one of the best GAR on Pittsburgh. Defend that one. Analytics aren’t everything buddy. They’re a great tool, but so is common sense. You’re over thinking this

https://twitter.com/gunnerstaal/status/1192556564353302528?s=21

https://twitter.com/gunnerstaal/status/1131903178109325312?s=21


so you just disagree with analytics when they dont work with your agendas. got it. feel free to leave now thanks smile
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 27
#21
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: The_Ultimate_Pielord
Damn, I have been sleeping on David Savard. Those are some nice numbers.

Still, he's only got an edge of 0.5 GAR with 2 thousand more minutes of TOI in the timeframe on PLD. I'm willing to bet PLD'd be higher if the TOI were even.

Respect the refusal to evaluate goalies. Richardson's been sneakily really good for the Coyotes as well, though.


ive been high on PLD, but his WOWY with panarin is kinda sketchy. im confident him and savard are the top 2 for CBJ, but itll be interesting how the rest of this season pans out for them
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 27
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
Quoting: kopiino
so you just disagree with analytics when they dont work with your agendas. got it. feel free to leave now thanks smile


No, it’s called using them appropriately and with common sense. Obviously there are some outliers in these advance stats. Any rational hockey fan knows Jones >>> savard. Or how Hammer isn’t the best player on his team.

Like I said, when evaluating players there are multiple factors to consider such as eye test, point production, etc...
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 28
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: kopiino
so you just disagree with analytics when they dont work with your agendas. got it. feel free to leave now thanks smile


By your account analytics actually show Patrick kane isnt a good hockey player soooo? Lmao
Earfgang a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 28
#24
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: The_Ultimate_Pielord
Damn, I have been sleeping on David Savard. Those are some nice numbers.

Still, he's only got an edge of 0.5 GAR with 2 thousand more minutes of TOI in the timeframe on PLD. I'm willing to bet PLD'd be higher if the TOI were even.

Respect the refusal to evaluate goalies. Richardson's been sneakily really good for the Coyotes as well, though.


also where are you getting your GAR from? i think we have some discrepancies in our numbers
17 nov. 2019 à 13 h 29
#25
Démarrer sujet
DeBrincat > Kane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 983
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: Dylan1995
By your account analytics actually show Patrick kane isnt a good hockey player soooo? Lmao


when did i say patrick kane isnt a good hockey player? hes been garbage this season, but he isnt a bad player
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage