Forums/Armchair-GM

Hainsey

Créé par: Marino4Norris
Date de création initiale: nov 5, 2019
Publié: 5 nov 2019 à 21 h 58
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Transactions
PIT
  1. Hainsey, Ron
OTT
  1. Johnson, Jack
  2. Aston-Reese, Zach
  3. 2020 3e round pick (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • Nick Bjugstad: 2 050 000 $ (50%)
Enfoui
  • Casey DeSmith: 175 000 $ (1 250 000 $)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
2021
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
ANA
2022
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 374 125 $132 500 $3 832 500 $3 125 875 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
PIT
Guentzel, Jake
6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
PIT
Crosby, Sidney
8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
PIT
Kahun, Dominik
925 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
PIT
Galchenyuk, Alex
4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
PIT
Malkin, Evgeni
9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
PIT
Rust, Bryan
3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
PIT
Tanev, Brandon
3 500 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
PIT
McCann, Jared
1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
PIT
Bjugstad, Nick
2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
PIT
Simon, Dominik
750 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
PIT
Blueger, Teddy
750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
PIT
Hörnqvist, Patric
5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
PIT
Dumoulin, Brian
4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
PIT
Letang, Kris
7 250 000 $
DD
NMC NTC
UFA - 3
PIT
Murray, Matt
3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
OTT
Hainsey, Ron
3 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
PIT
Schultz, Justin
5 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
PIT
Jarry, Tristan
675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
PIT
Pettersson, Marcus
874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
PIT
Marino, John
925 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
PIT
Lafferty, Sam
767 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
PIT
Ruhwedel, Chad
700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
PIT
Riikola, Juuso
850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Hörnqvist, P.
Guentzel, J.
Crosby, S.
Letang, K.
Malkin, E.
Avantage numérique 2
Bjugstad, N.
McCann, J.
Simon, D.
Schultz, J.
Galchenyuk, A.
Infériorité numérique 1
Blueger, T.
Rust, B.
Dumoulin, B.
Letang, K.
Infériorité numérique 2
Tanev, B.
Kahun, D.
Pettersson, M.
Hainsey, R.

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 nov 2019 à 21 h 58
#1
Crazy Penguins Fan
Rejoint: nov 2017
Messages: 177
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Not again.
5 nov 2019 à 22 h 10
#2
arky
Rejoint: aoû 2016
Messages: 3,116
Mentions "j'aime": 1,204
So Aston Reese and a 3rd for a serviceable defenseman and take this horrible deal. To get rid of JJ it will take at least AR a d a pick so stop thinking you are going to give the least to get rid of JJ and expect something in return better than bag of pucks.
5 nov 2019 à 22 h 58
#3
Along51
Rejoint: fév 2018
Messages: 130
Mentions "j'aime": 19
jj has actually been good recently
6 nov 2019 à 2 h 36
#4
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 12,843
Mentions "j'aime": 3,021
Quoting: mikearky
So Aston Reese and a 3rd for a serviceable defenseman and take this horrible deal. To get rid of JJ it will take at least AR a d a pick so stop thinking you are going to give the least to get rid of JJ and expect something in return better than bag of pucks.


You don't watch much hockey do you.
You hear a bunch of people say. Yeah JJ sucks......then just go along with the flow.
in 14 games he's given up 6 goals and the team has scored 9 in 5v5 play. In 5v5 close play. It's 6 goals for and 2 against. And at tie it's 2 for and 1 against.
You can flip it, turn it, stand it on it's head. It doesn't matter. Anyone watching knows that whats happening on the ice is working. EVERYONE.
The truth is JJ is playing better 5v5 hockey than many teams 3rd pairings. He's been a solid contributor on the PK, and even helped out a little on the offensive zone.
And he's done it without getting sheltered. 66.7% of his starts on in the defensive end.
WTF are you thinking.
6 nov 2019 à 8 h 19
#5
bigZ
Rejoint: jun 2019
Messages: 680
Mentions "j'aime": 310
Quoting: pharrow
You don't watch much hockey do you.
You hear a bunch of people say. Yeah JJ sucks......then just go along with the flow.
in 14 games he's given up 6 goals and the team has scored 9 in 5v5 play. In 5v5 close play. It's 6 goals for and 2 against. And at tie it's 2 for and 1 against.
You can flip it, turn it, stand it on it's head. It doesn't matter. Anyone watching knows that whats happening on the ice is working. EVERYONE.
The truth is JJ is playing better 5v5 hockey than many teams 3rd pairings. He's been a solid contributor on the PK, and even helped out a little on the offensive zone.
And he's done it without getting sheltered. 66.7% of his starts on in the defensive end.
WTF are you thinking.


how dare you bring logic and sense in here. JJ bad! Give Poulin for JJ! smh some people here are basically sheep
6 nov 2019 à 10 h 21
#6
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 12,843
Mentions "j'aime": 3,021
Quoting: bigZ98
how dare you bring logic and sense in here. JJ bad! Give Poulin for JJ! smh some people here are basically sheep


my bad, sorry
6 nov 2019 à 12 h 05
#7
arky
Rejoint: aoû 2016
Messages: 3,116
Mentions "j'aime": 1,204
Quoting: pharrow
You don't watch much hockey do you.
You hear a bunch of people say. Yeah JJ sucks......then just go along with the flow.
in 14 games he's given up 6 goals and the team has scored 9 in 5v5 play. In 5v5 close play. It's 6 goals for and 2 against. And at tie it's 2 for and 1 against.
You can flip it, turn it, stand it on it's head. It doesn't matter. Anyone watching knows that whats happening on the ice is working. EVERYONE.
The truth is JJ is playing better 5v5 hockey than many teams 3rd pairings. He's been a solid contributor on the PK, and even helped out a little on the offensive zone.
And he's done it without getting sheltered. 66.7% of his starts on in the defensive end.
WTF are you thinking.


Ok, so you say he is playing better, but history shows that over the last 2 to 3 years he has been bad. A short 10 to 15 games does not mean he has turned any corner. Could he become serviceable in a certain kind of system, sure. But with cap space at a premium do teams want to take that chance?
6 nov 2019 à 13 h 00
#8
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 12,843
Mentions "j'aime": 3,021
Quoting: mikearky
Ok, so you say he is playing better, but history shows that over the last 2 to 3 years he has been bad. A short 10 to 15 games does not mean he has turned any corner. Could he become serviceable in a certain kind of system, sure. But with cap space at a premium do teams want to take that chance?


if you are going by the last 2 years you are wasting your time.
He spent the vast majority of the year last year on his off side playing with mix and match partners because Schultz was out all year. That's not how you judge a player.
The year before that he was in CBJ and not getting along with the coaching staff. That's all there is to that.

We saw this play at the end of last year. When schultz had come back from injury. He was a -20 something until switched back to his natural side where he finished a -4 on the year I think. That means in a short time period he went +16 at the end of the year.
You see now and he's what a +3 or +4.
He's not coughing up goals all over the ice, only 6 goals at even strength.
You can talk about system or this or that or whatever.
How about judging a guy playing on his proper side?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage