SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Zucker

Créé par: bigbrit93
Équipe: 2019-20 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 1 nov. 2019
Publié: 1 nov. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Seen a lot of the mocks for Zucker include dumping Backes. I personally think that just raises the price for Zucker far too much.

Here we send them Kuhlman, and high-energy guy who has proven he can excel and probably stay in the top-6 if given the chance.
Zboril is a potential top-4 guy who is starting to progress more than he had in his first few years after being drafted.
Obviously if I'm the Wild I'm probably holding out for more, but I think two B(ish) prospects and a middle round pick is enough for a team that is so far in the dumpster.

To help with the cap where I didn't dump Backes, both Miller and Moore get moved for a set of 3rd round picks. Jets need defensive help, and the Ducks could use that toughness on the backend that Miller brings.

The final step to being cap-compliant after the the Zucker deal is either burying Backes or Lindholm in Providence.Putting Backes there gives the Bs a little more room than if it's Lindholm, but I'd be fine with it being reversed as well.
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Kuhlman, Karson
  2. Zboril, Jakub
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
3.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 746 667 $0 $2 432 500 $1 753 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 nov. 2019 à 9 h 52
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
This would work if there weren’t 29 other teams that could make offers for zucker. Someone would significantly top that.
Propeller09 a aimé ceci.
1 nov. 2019 à 9 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Not even close to enough.
1 nov. 2019 à 9 h 55
#3
Démarrer sujet
bigbrit93
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 314
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: Bcarlo25
This would work if there weren’t 29 other teams that could make offers for zucker. Someone would significantly top that.


Yeah this was more my ideal give for Zucker based on what I feel is fair. Would you prefer higher picks or another prospect thrown in to what I already have?
1 nov. 2019 à 10 h 6
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: bigbrit93
Yeah this was more my ideal give for Zucker based on what I feel is fair. Would you prefer higher picks or another prospect thrown in to what I already have?


I mean, you traded them a few spare parts for a legit player. Kuhlman, lauzon, and a 2nd? Probably still a hard no, and that’s a significantly better package.
1 nov. 2019 à 10 h 16
#5
Démarrer sujet
bigbrit93
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 314
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I mean, you traded them a few spare parts for a legit player. Kuhlman, lauzon, and a 2nd? Probably still a hard no, and that’s a significantly better package.


Fair enough. Guess my Bruins blinders were on where I see Kuhlman as a legit middle-6, potential top-6 mainstay more so than being a spare part.

Kuhlman, Lauzon, Senyshyn and a 2nd? A winger who has shown he's more than capable in the NHL, a d-man who in limited time has shown NHL readiness, and a winger who (to me) looks close to NHL ready.
1 nov. 2019 à 10 h 19
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,652
Mentions "j'aime": 8,774
Modifié 1 nov. 2019 à 11 h 10
Quoting: bigbrit93
Yeah this was more my ideal give for Zucker based on what I feel is fair. Would you prefer higher picks or another prospect thrown in to what I already have?


It would likely take a 2nd and quality FW prospect or 1st and mid.
1 nov. 2019 à 10 h 20
#7
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: bigbrit93
Fair enough. Guess my Bruins blinders were on where I see Kuhlman as a legit middle-6, potential top-6 mainstay more so than being a spare part.

Kuhlman, Lauzon, Senyshyn and a 2nd? A winger who has shown he's more than capable in the NHL, a d-man who in limited time has shown NHL readiness, and a winger who (to me) looks close to NHL ready.


Woah woah woah, are you referring to Senyshyn as nearly NHL ready? Senyshyn is nothing. When his entry deal is up (I think they can use the slide rule on him at least once), he might not even be qualified.
1 nov. 2019 à 10 h 25
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: bigbrit93
Fair enough. Guess my Bruins blinders were on where I see Kuhlman as a legit middle-6, potential top-6 mainstay more so than being a spare part.

Kuhlman, Lauzon, Senyshyn and a 2nd? A winger who has shown he's more than capable in the NHL, a d-man who in limited time has shown NHL readiness, and a winger who (to me) looks close to NHL ready.


senyshyn at this point is a nothing add. kuhlman hasnt proved he can fully play effectively full time in the nhl. i like lauzon and i dont particularly want to move him.
1 nov. 2019 à 10 h 41
#9
Démarrer sujet
bigbrit93
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 314
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Woah woah woah, are you referring to Senyshyn as nearly NHL ready? Senyshyn is nothing. When his entry deal is up (I think they can use the slide rule on him at least once), he might not even be qualified.


Quoting: hanson493
senyshyn at this point is a nothing add. kuhlman hasnt proved he can fully play effectively full time in the nhl. i like lauzon and i dont particularly want to move him.


I guess in the games I've seen him play I felt he looked like a big, quick, solid winger. I know he hasn't had the points in the AHL, but felt that was always attributed to the staff trying to round out his defensive game. Maybe I've just been reading into him all wrong and that whole "rounding out his game" has been covering their ass for him just not panning out at all.
1 nov. 2019 à 10 h 53
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: bigbrit93
I guess in the games I've seen him play I felt he looked like a big, quick, solid winger. I know he hasn't had the points in the AHL, but felt that was always attributed to the staff trying to round out his defensive game. Maybe I've just been reading into him all wrong and that whole "rounding out his game" has been covering their ass for him just not panning out at all.


its not that, i like senyshyn the player. I think they are trying to make him something he isnt. but he isnt a valuable asset right now.
1 nov. 2019 à 10 h 53
#11
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,833
Mentions "j'aime": 6,911
Quoting: bigbrit93
I guess in the games I've seen him play I felt he looked like a big, quick, solid winger. I know he hasn't had the points in the AHL, but felt that was always attributed to the staff trying to round out his defensive game. Maybe I've just been reading into him all wrong and that whole "rounding out his game" has been covering their ass for him just not panning out at all.


I think they’re trying to round out his game because they’re hoping he can be a solid fourth liner
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage