SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline dealio

Créé par: GuentzelvaniaUSA
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 27 oct. 2019
Publié: 29 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
MIN
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $79 024 125 $132 500 $3 832 500 $2 475 875 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 oct. 2019 à 11 h 15
#1
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Overpayment for Zucker, take out the first and maybe add a 2nd or a 3rd with Bjugstad. No way would pens be okay with giving up a first for zucker.
29 oct. 2019 à 11 h 31
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,009
Mentions "j'aime": 3,223
Hey a trade that makes sense. Kudos.
29 oct. 2019 à 11 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: bigZ98
Overpayment for Zucker, take out the first and maybe add a 2nd or a 3rd with Bjugstad. No way would pens be okay with giving up a first for zucker.


Bjugstad and a 2nd is plenty. Zucker is not a star, and his contract is not good (not horrible, but not good)

Zucker, top line time, top PP, 5 points. No 5v5 goals and only 2 5v5 assists. People can keep pointing at the 60 point season, but be is an expensive, rather one-dimentional 20g+20a guy.
bigZ98 a aimé ceci.
29 oct. 2019 à 11 h 46
#4
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Hey a trade that makes sense. Kudos.


Giving up a first for zucker makes sense? Yikes.
29 oct. 2019 à 11 h 53
#5
Along51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 130
Mentions "j'aime": 19
This only makes sense to me if Hörnqvist is the guy going the other way
29 oct. 2019 à 11 h 53
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,009
Mentions "j'aime": 3,223
Quoting: bigZ98
Giving up a first for zucker makes sense? Yikes.


Yeah Zucker is a possession, speeding, skilled beast who would get 70 points in PIT.
29 oct. 2019 à 13 h 23
#7
bigZ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 311
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Yeah Zucker is a possession, speeding, skilled beast who would get 70 points in PIT.


Sure but you dont trade based on what he will become when he plays for you, you trade for what the player is worth playing on his current team. We could easily get zucker for far less than a top 9 forward, third, AND a first. If that is the asking price then it would be a huge pass from me.
29 oct. 2019 à 16 h 8
#8
Démarrer sujet
Pengweenies
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,966
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Quoting: bigZ98
Giving up a first for zucker makes sense? Yikes.


The value doesn’t have to be on the money for the trade to make sense. I could have nixed the 1st but the basic principle of bjugstad + picks for Zucker makes sense for both teams
29 oct. 2019 à 18 h 56
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Yojimbo
Bjugstad and a 2nd is plenty. Zucker is not a star, and his contract is not good (not horrible, but not good)

Zucker, top line time, top PP, 5 points. No 5v5 goals and only 2 5v5 assists. People can keep pointing at the 60 point season, but be is an expensive, rather one-dimentional 20g+20a guy.


I agree with this. I don't see this improving the team at 5v5.

Quoting: along51
This only makes sense to me if Hörnqvist is the guy going the other way


Hornqvist is a better 5v5 player.

This right now to me is a reach. This team needs to win at 5v5 to contend for a cup. The problem with Kessel was he lost his effectiveness in 5v5 play. Yes they kind of miss him on the PP but it's the 5v5 play that is more important.

Zucker is alright but to me he is a mid 6 winger.
There is no need to over pay for one.
On top of it you are taking on that cap hit for the next 3 years after this year.
I don't really think that's a wise decision.
There are better players to target in the offseason.
29 oct. 2019 à 20 h 56
#10
Along51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 130
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Hornqvist is a better 5v5 player.

This right now to me is a reach. This team needs to win at 5v5 to contend for a cup. The problem with Kessel was he lost his effectiveness in 5v5 play. Yes they kind of miss him on the PP but it's the 5v5 play that is more important.

Zucker is alright but to me he is a mid 6 winger.
There is no need to over pay for one.
On top of it you are taking on that cap hit for the next 3 years after this year.
I don't really think that's a wise decision.
There are better players to target in the offseason.[/quote]


With the way Simon is playing it's not needed as I could see Zucker with Sid and Jake. I wouldn't do the first but I'd be interested in doing Hornqvist and a prospect or late round pick. I think Zuckers game would change a lot in a new system. No one looks good in minny
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage