SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NHL competent RD

Créé par: BCAPP
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 26 oct. 2019
Publié: 26 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Holzer, Korbinian
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Cap dump for the leafs, upgrade for the Ducks with no long term requirement
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $60 761 257 $0 $2 182 500 $20 738 743 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 oct. 2019 à 15 h 5
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
I think Holzer played for the Leafs before.
26 oct. 2019 à 15 h 12
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,380
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: MikeyThePensFan
I think Holzer played for the Leafs before.


He did indeed. He was an AHLer for the leafs for about 2-3 years, earned his promotion and was traded to the ducks after about 1 season
26 oct. 2019 à 15 h 43
#3
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,414
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Modifié 26 oct. 2019 à 15 h 59
I haven’t seen this years numbers but in limited time last season Holzer was actually decent. I was surprised. I think he’s actually an NHL D, may only be a 6/7 but NHL quality at least. Don’t see a need for Ceci and his $4.5M cap. I would’ve taken Ceci over Gudbranson tho.
BCAPP a aimé ceci.
26 oct. 2019 à 15 h 46
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,380
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Jah1722
I haven’t seen this years numbers but in limited time last season Holzer was actually decent. I was surprised. I think he’s actually an NHL D, may only be a 6/7 but NHL quality at least. Don’t see a need for Ceci and husband $4.5M cap. I would’ve taken Ceci over Gudbranson tho.


I just figured that if the ducks want to upgrade their d without long term commitment Ceci makes sense.

Ceci is a decent d who has just been asked to do too much in his career.

Playing 19minutes against mid tier opposition he can excel.

If the Leafs need to dump cap he could probably be had for minimal cost. Win win
26 oct. 2019 à 16 h 0
#5
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,414
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: BCAPP
I just figured that if the ducks want to upgrade their d without long term commitment Ceci makes sense.

Ceci is a decent d who has just been asked to do too much in his career.

Playing 19minutes against mid tier opposition he can excel.

If the Leafs need to dump cap he could probably be had for minimal cost. Win win


Before Gudbranson sure but they already added a guy with poor analytics. They shoulda traded for Honka tbh. He fits the team better age and development wise.
BCAPP et OrangeMallard a aimé ceci.
26 oct. 2019 à 16 h 1
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,380
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Jah1722
Before Gudbranson sure but they already added a guy with poor analytics. They shoulda traded for Honka tbh. He fits the team better age and development wise.


I can understand that.

I just think that Ceci's problem had been usage. The Leafs have been forced to make the same mistake. I think Ceci's analytics would look better with better usage...

I also think he makes sense for the ducks as the cost is so low. No long term commitment, just cap space which has value but at this point in the season less than it did in the summer.
26 oct. 2019 à 17 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Toronto needs to dump cap, the ducks need a replacement rhd. It seems like a win-win and makes so much more sense than the Gudbranson deal. Plus ceci only has 1 year left. Unless the leafs think that hes a top pair guy, they have no reason to keep him in their current cap situation.
27 oct. 2019 à 20 h 38
#8
Quack Quack Quack
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 59
So, if Ceci is a cap dump, why is ANA also giving up a 3rd? Seems like TOR should be adding in the 3rd, not ANA
27 oct. 2019 à 22 h 14
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,380
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: OrangeMallard
So, if Ceci is a cap dump, why is ANA also giving up a 3rd? Seems like TOR should be adding in the 3rd, not ANA


Because I think he is useful for you. You have tonnes of cap space. You just paid less for a ****tier player stuck on term. So I figure you'd pay a little more for a better player with no long term commitment.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage