SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Colliton needs to switch the lines

Créé par: bluedemon5
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 23 oct. 2019
Publié: 23 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $64 750 811 $0 $6 707 500 $16 749 189 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 oct. 2019 à 17 h 58
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Seems like everyone on ACGM agrees.
23 oct. 2019 à 18 h 13
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Seems like everyone on ACGM agrees.


I agree we should switch them, and I like these lines, except I would switch Dach and Shaw. Toews and Kane work best when they have someone who will go to the dirty areas for the puck and clear space. Dach is good at clearing space, but has looked hesitant in his first few games. Shaw, on the other hand, is the perfect candidate for that job (more skilled Caggiula). This would also allow Dach to play on his natural wing. That 2nd line may be a defensive liability, but I think Dach has looked solid defensively and could negate some of that.
23 oct. 2019 à 20 h 30
#3
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 390
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Petrock83
I agree we should switch them, and I like these lines, except I would switch Dach and Shaw. Toews and Kane work best when they have someone who will go to the dirty areas for the puck and clear space. Dach is good at clearing space, but has looked hesitant in his first few games. Shaw, on the other hand, is the perfect candidate for that job (more skilled Caggiula). This would also allow Dach to play on his natural wing. That 2nd line may be a defensive liability, but I think Dach has looked solid defensively and could negate some of that.


What about switching Strome and Shaw from the lines against Vegas?
23 oct. 2019 à 20 h 56
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Problem there is that Dach would have to play center, and he sucks at faceoffs. I like the idea if Shaw takes the faceoffs though.
23 oct. 2019 à 22 h 56
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Modifié 23 oct. 2019 à 23 h 2
Quoting: Petrock83
Problem there is that Dach would have to play center, and he sucks at faceoffs. I like the idea if Shaw takes the faceoffs though.


Quoting: Petrock83
I agree we should switch them, and I like these lines, except I would switch Dach and Shaw. Toews and Kane work best when they have someone who will go to the dirty areas for the puck and clear space. Dach is good at clearing space, but has looked hesitant in his first few games. Shaw, on the other hand, is the perfect candidate for that job (more skilled Caggiula). This would also allow Dach to play on his natural wing. That 2nd line may be a defensive liability, but I think Dach has looked solid defensively and could negate some of that.


I have to say I don’t hate these line ideas. They’re not bad, especially when we really gotta our strome and cat back together. However, Shaw and dach should definitely stay where they are on this thread. Putting dach on a line with strome and cat would be incredibly slow. Shaw gives strome and cat energy and an option at the net. Meanwhile, dach can be carried by toews and Kane. Honestly the only difference between him looking like a 2C/3C tops and a bonafide 1C is speed. He’s gotta get faster, otherwise, he’s doomed to be another strome. Strome needs faster guys around him to make a difference, and unfortunately dach is much the same unless he gets faster.

I do agree with the faceoffs thing. Dach is god awful on faceoffs. On an ironic note, faceoff ability rarely improves on prospects, so what would happen if dach (at third overall, franchise center) ends up being a career winger...........

Yes, granted, not a fan of his.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage