SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks need a winger

Créé par: MJC13
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 17 oct. 2019
Publié: 17 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
...And if anyone it's gonna be Doug Wilson who goes after the biggest fish.

This probably isn't gonna happen but it's a fun hypothetical
Transactions
NJD
  1. Dillon, Brenden
  2. Karlsson, Melker
  3. Merkley, Ryan
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
(Picks are the same as the Karlsson deal, NJD gets the 2022 2nd if Hall re-signs, and gets the 2022 1st if he re-signs and they win the cup in that time)

(Dillon and Karlsson are only there to make the cap work - both are only on 1 year deals)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 089 084 $660 750 $345 000 $10 410 916 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
960 000 $960 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 oct. 2019 à 15 h 5
#1
Dr.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,485
Mentions "j'aime": 1,413
Seems like a waste for a rental, and to be in the same position next year with less assets. I think they'd be smarter to go after someone with a few years term on a decent cap hit. I don't think Hall plays San Jose's style as well
palhal a aimé ceci.
17 oct. 2019 à 15 h 35
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Terrible deal for a rental. Merkely is a future star and we should only be trading him for a young winger on a long contract
aedoran a aimé ceci.
17 oct. 2019 à 15 h 38
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 392
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Quoting: papishark
Terrible deal for a rental. Merkely is a future star and we should only be trading him for a young winger on a long contract


I'd agree but we're not dealing with Dorion this time around. The Devils will probably want more than we gave up for Karlsson, especially with the fact that we could probably convince Hall to stay like we did with EK.
17 oct. 2019 à 15 h 53
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: MJC13
I'd agree but we're not dealing with Dorion this time around. The Devils will probably want more than we gave up for Karlsson, especially with the fact that we could probably convince Hall to stay like we did with EK.


Don't know where you coming up with all the cap to resign Hall. He gets a raise and do some RFAs. Very little expiring big money.
17 oct. 2019 à 15 h 56
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 392
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Quoting: palhal
Don't know where you coming up with all the cap to resign Hall. He gets a raise and do some RFAs. Very little expiring big money.


Mix of expiring contracts, increase in cap, and the rumored Vlasic to MTL deal would probably be needed to make it work. Then again this is a hypothetical and honestly it is unrealistic to pull of blockbuster trades in back-to-back years.
papishark a aimé ceci.
17 oct. 2019 à 16 h 23
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: MJC13
Mix of expiring contracts, increase in cap, and the rumored Vlasic to MTL deal would probably be needed to make it work. Then again this is a hypothetical and honestly it is unrealistic to pull of blockbuster trades in back-to-back years.


We would have the cap if needed. There are ways to retain him, just ask toronto how they pull it off
17 oct. 2019 à 16 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,351
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Modifié 17 oct. 2019 à 16 h 41
Quoting: MJC13
I'd agree but we're not dealing with Dorion this time around. The Devils will probably want more than we gave up for Karlsson, especially with the fact that we could probably convince Hall to stay like we did with EK.


I think the Mark Stone trade should be the "benchmark" of a sign-and-trade for Taylor Hall
- A top prospect (Sens got Erik Brannstrom)
- 1st round pick (Sens would've gotten 1st round pick if Dorion was smart enough)
- Roster player (considering Hall is better than Stone)
- Something else to clear the Sharks cap
17 oct. 2019 à 16 h 39
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,351
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: MJC13
Mix of expiring contracts, increase in cap, and the rumored Vlasic to MTL deal would probably be needed to make it work. Then again this is a hypothetical and honestly it is unrealistic to pull of blockbuster trades in back-to-back years.


Rumours are rumours. There were rumours that Kovalchuk would go to NY. Panarin joining Bobrovsky in Florida. Karlsson trying to pull off a "Chris Pronger" move.

Besides, I don't think Vlasic would waive his NMC to be traded to Montreal. He already made fun of his hometown media for writing an article about him buying a house in Quebec. On the other hand, Montreal already has Weber and Price on close to bad contract.
17 oct. 2019 à 19 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,489
Mentions "j'aime": 11,900
Quoting: papishark
Terrible deal for a rental. Merkely is a future star and we should only be trading him for a young winger on a long contract


I agree I wouldn't give up Merkely but he won't net a big return until he plays a few games in the NHL.
papishark a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage