SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Someone please take Ritchie

Créé par: Arlotti47
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 17 oct. 2019
Publié: 17 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $53 509 832 $0 $2 315 000 $27 990 168 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 oct. 2019 à 13 h 38
#1
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Why? He bad?
17 oct. 2019 à 13 h 41
#2
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: SammyT_51
Why? He bad?


No he’s mad because he punched Sobotka in the face last night after Sobotka caught him in the chin earlier in the shift.
SammyT_51 a aimé ceci.
17 oct. 2019 à 13 h 42
#3
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: Jah1722
No he’s mad because he punched Sobotka in the face last night after Sobotka caught him in the chin earlier in the shift.


Sobotka deserved it and I would take Ritchie on Leafs lol
17 oct. 2019 à 13 h 51
#4
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: SammyT_51
Sobotka deserved it and I would take Ritchie on Leafs lol


I don’t mind Ritchie but other ducks fans are mad that he was picked 10th overall and is just a 3rd liner that takes some bad penalties.
17 oct. 2019 à 13 h 54
#5
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: Jah1722
I don’t mind Ritchie but other ducks fans are mad that he was picked 10th overall and is just a 3rd liner that takes some bad penalties.


I mean.. he has potential still, I think if he was a LW on a line with like JT and Marner or Matthews-Nylander, that he would be good and would fully use his skill. But sometimes players just tend to underdevelop and that is normal IMO.
17 oct. 2019 à 14 h 15
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 1,414
Mentions "j'aime": 389
Quoting: SammyT_51
I mean.. he has potential still, I think if he was a LW on a line with like JT and Marner or Matthews-Nylander, that he would be good and would fully use his skill. But sometimes players just tend to underdevelop and that is normal IMO.


You guys can have him. Give us like Ceci or something.
17 oct. 2019 à 14 h 22
#7
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Quoting: Arlotti47
You guys can have him. Give us like Ceci or something.


OKEY!
17 oct. 2019 à 17 h 41
#8
Jam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Jah1722
No he’s mad because he punched Sobotka in the face last night after Sobotka caught him in the chin earlier in the shift.


Ritchie also punched him while he was on the ice. As much as I have been on the "trade Ritchie train" for awhile, that has always been for the mediocre play and bad penalties.
The stunt he pulled last night was a goon move. Just stupid and could have really hurt Sobotka. Sure he got clipped by Sobotka first but challenge the dude to a fight, don't drag him to the ice. I don't ever want to see someone get Bertuzzi'd again.
17 oct. 2019 à 21 h 6
#9
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: Icarus
Ritchie also punched him while he was on the ice. As much as I have been on the "trade Ritchie train" for awhile, that has always been for the mediocre play and bad penalties.
The stunt he pulled last night was a goon move. Just stupid and could have really hurt Sobotka. Sure he got clipped by Sobotka first but challenge the dude to a fight, don't drag him to the ice. I don't ever want to see someone get Bertuzzi'd again.


He did challenge him and Sobotka flopped so Ritchie got his money’s worth on the penalty after Ulmark jumped on him. You’re only mad because of who did that and not at what happened. It’s the same people pissed at Ritchie every time for anything he does. Time to get over it. He is what he is.
18 oct. 2019 à 11 h 55
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: SammyT_51
I mean.. he has potential still, I think if he was a LW on a line with like JT and Marner or Matthews-Nylander, that he would be good and would fully use his skill. But sometimes players just tend to underdevelop and that is normal IMO.


Does he though? I really feel like what we've seen from Ritchie is what we're going to get. He can't skate, he's never going to be able to skate but he does has good hands. He just seems incapable of not taking bad penalties but all-in-all he's a 30ish point player making absolute peanuts for the next two years. Honestly, I think if we hadn't drafted him 10th overall I don't think so many of us would be so down on him. But I'm absolutely done thinking he's ever going to be more than the player he is right now. I wouldn't give him away just for the sake of giving him away but if another team really covets him I wouldn't hesitate if they're offering a decent return.
Icarus a aimé ceci.
18 oct. 2019 à 12 h 58
#11
Jam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: TheJoeMan
Does he though? I really feel like what we've seen from Ritchie is what we're going to get. He can't skate, he's never going to be able to skate but he does has good hands. He just seems incapable of not taking bad penalties but all-in-all he's a 30ish point player making absolute peanuts for the next two years. Honestly, I think if we hadn't drafted him 10th overall I don't think so many of us would be so down on him. But I'm absolutely done thinking he's ever going to be more than the player he is right now. I wouldn't give him away just for the sake of giving him away but if another team really covets him I wouldn't hesitate if they're offering a decent return.


I definitely agree with this take. I think as much as we wish we got a better player at 10, especially considering 2014 ended up yielding a lot of good players after 10 (Vrana, Larkin [oof], Sanheim, Deangelo, Kapanen, and of course Pastranak), we didn't. And that happens. From a draft perspective, Ritchie is one of the biggest busts of the first round. But if you look at contract to contribution, he's a steal. When Ritchie plays well he can generate good offense, is a solid front net presence, and a physical force. That being said, I don't think he fits the future of the Ducks. We saw in buffalo that our team plays best quick, scrappy, and creatively. Ritchie is not that. I think there is a better fit on another team, but I would be surprised if a team pursuing him offers more than a late pick.
TheJoeMan a aimé ceci.
18 oct. 2019 à 23 h 48
#12
Ithical
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Icarus
I definitely agree with this take. I think as much as we wish we got a better player at 10, especially considering 2014 ended up yielding a lot of good players after 10 (Vrana, Larkin [oof], Sanheim, Deangelo, Kapanen, and of course Pastranak), we didn't. And that happens. From a draft perspective, Ritchie is one of the biggest busts of the first round. But if you look at contract to contribution, he's a steal. When Ritchie plays well he can generate good offense, is a solid front net presence, and a physical force. That being said, I don't think he fits the future of the Ducks. We saw in buffalo that our team plays best quick, scrappy, and creatively. Ritchie is not that. I think there is a better fit on another team, but I would be surprised if a team pursuing him offers more than a late pick.


What about a team like Carolina? They're apparently interested in a top 9 f. Ritchie for Roland Mckeown + anything?
20 oct. 2019 à 22 h 29
#13
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Lets just keep Ritchie. If he was a 2nd or 3rd rounder that wasn't pick in front of Larkin or Pasternak the fan base would love him. He's not that bad.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage