SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What needs to happen

Créé par: dgfresh78
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 3 oct. 2019
Publié: 3 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Gudbranson, Erik (1 000 000 $ retained)
2.
DAL
  1. Hörnqvist, Patric
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PIT)
3.
ANA
  1. Janmark, Mattias
  2. Johnson, Jack (750 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 034 124 $132 500 $3 700 000 $11 465 876 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 oct. 2019 à 22 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Johnson and Hörnqvist gotta go but feel like u giving up way too much.
3 oct. 2019 à 22 h 31
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,277
Mentions "j'aime": 507
Quoting: EGM
Johnson and Hörnqvist gotta go but feel like u giving up way too much.


The way I see it is that this team has traded many draft picks in the past to improve with additions. The precedent should be the same if needed to improve by subtraction.
3 oct. 2019 à 23 h 36
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,138
Mentions "j'aime": 5,938
Assuming the second is the sweetener for Johnson (ducks don’t do it unless it’s at least a first since we don’t need another LD and even then maybe not) a 4th liner doesn’t get Larsson
4 oct. 2019 à 0 h 33
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
too much panic on one game.
Really if I get rid of anyone right now it's sullivan.
WTF did he dress JJ.
WTF has he not changed the system. You play 3 men below the line and you will always have odd man rush fast break.
Play stupid coach.
Win stupid prizes.
DonkeyLips a aimé ceci.
4 oct. 2019 à 7 h 13
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,277
Mentions "j'aime": 507
Quoting: pharrow
too much panic on one game.
Really if I get rid of anyone right now it's sullivan.
WTF did he dress JJ.
WTF has he not changed the system. You play 3 men below the line and you will always have odd man rush fast break.
Play stupid coach.
Win stupid prizes.


You’re honestly right...this team is fine if they switch Hornqvist for Kahun and things will get better if they ever trade JJ. Although Guddy struggled last night he looked a bit faster compared to last season. I feel like he got caught at times because of them trying to shelter JJ. You can’t shelter two defenseman on different pairings and expect to succeed.
4 oct. 2019 à 7 h 53
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: dgfresh78
You’re honestly right...this team is fine if they switch Hornqvist for Kahun and things will get better if they ever trade JJ. Although Guddy struggled last night he looked a bit faster compared to last season. I feel like he got caught at times because of them trying to shelter JJ. You can’t shelter two defenseman on different pairings and expect to succeed.


they missed Rust last night that was obvious. Everyone wanted to trade him but without a fast player like him on the wing there is a hole.
Kahun, I'm neither here nor there. He's played multiple games at this point, I'm not overly impressed. He ain't done nothing. He hasn't shown me he has elite speed. If he doesn't start doing something on that ice you might as well send him to wbs too for someone who will.

My biggest issue right now is Sullivan. If he can't change the system then they won't ever win. He's hell bent on constantly playing below the line. You aren't going to win every puck battle. and when you lose the pucks going the other way in numbers. It's fine to play down there occasionally, but you can't play the whole game that way. It shows.
4 oct. 2019 à 7 h 58
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Vs the Sabres... the sabres where very good, and the pens where on a new level of bad. Malkins line was the most productive line but they never scored. 1 goal was scored on PP with 5 chances. The PP chances at the end of the game where sooo bad. 17 giveaways needs to be fixed also. Good game for Buffalo who could have easily had 6-7 goals.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage