SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If I were Eakins

Créé par: Icarus
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 1 oct. 2019
Publié: 1 oct. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is just my opinion about how lines should be. Literally just based on who I think works well plus considering waiver exemption status (Lundestrom especially). Feel free to disagree.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $53 608 757 $0 $2 315 000 $27 891 243 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 541 000 $1 541 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 oct. 2019 à 13 h 56
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Get Rowney out of there and Ritchie in

And god that D is weak
1 oct. 2019 à 13 h 57
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 639
Mentions "j'aime": 161
They have too many lhd
1 oct. 2019 à 14 h 4
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: TMG
They have too many lhd


Way too many
1 oct. 2019 à 14 h 8
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
A. Sprong isnt a 4th liner, he will never be, plus FHCGMBM doesnt want him there, why he got waived, and I believe that Steel is also waiver exempt, and Lundestrom has looked fantastic on the Swede line, and i would put Kase with Getz, Getz's line hasn't looked fantastic (I haven't watched much though... East coast sucks sometimes) with a guy like Sam Carrick on his wing with Comtois
1 oct. 2019 à 14 h 15
#5
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,545
Mentions "j'aime": 12,303
Ducks were crazy to not send an offersheet to Deangelo.
Icarus a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 14 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
This is almost exactly the lineup I would ice with the players we have right now. Only change I would make is swapping Terry for Kase though Kase's chemistry with Henrique probably does make more sense. I think this lineup gives us the best chance to win and spread the offense around.
Icarus a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 14 h 32
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: Max27
Get Rowney out of there and Ritchie in

And god that D is weak


Rowney is a really solid fourth liner and Ritchie is wasted in a bottom-six role, even more so than Sprong in my opinion (at least Sprong can skate). I won't lose any sleep seeing Ritchie in the press box. And I don't think our D is going to be nearly as bad as we've feared all summer. Guhle and Larsson look like they're ready to at least be decent, everyday d-men and Del Zotto is a fine sixth d-man.
Icarus a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 14 h 34
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: AFOX10900
A. Sprong isnt a 4th liner, he will never be, plus FHCGMBM doesnt want him there, why he got waived, and I believe that Steel is also waiver exempt, and Lundestrom has looked fantastic on the Swede line, and i would put Kase with Getz, Getz's line hasn't looked fantastic (I haven't watched much though... East coast sucks sometimes) with a guy like Sam Carrick on his wing with Comtois


If Steel is healthy, he absolutely gets the nod over Lundestrom. That kid has looked pretty good but Steel is a much more polished player at this point.
Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 14 h 57
#9
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
One of Jones or Comtois is sent down and Ritchie takes their spot. But I like that you have Rowney centering the 4th line. He had a career year last year and deserves the first shot at it
Icarus a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 15 h 23
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: TheJoeMan
If Steel is healthy, he absolutely gets the nod over Lundestrom. That kid has looked pretty good but Steel is a much more polished player at this point.


I didn't realize Steel was hurt, my bad lol
TheJoeMan a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 16 h 4
#11
Démarrer sujet
Jam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: AFOX10900
A. Sprong isnt a 4th liner, he will never be, plus FHCGMBM doesnt want him there, why he got waived, and I believe that Steel is also waiver exempt, and Lundestrom has looked fantastic on the Swede line, and i would put Kase with Getz, Getz's line hasn't looked fantastic (I haven't watched much though... East coast sucks sometimes) with a guy like Sam Carrick on his wing with Comtois


None of this was based on actuality. This is just what I would do. But I guess I might as well justify my opinions:

A lot of the lineup focuses on protecting players from the expansion draft. Right now, this is how I see protections going:
(7/3/1) > Henrique, Kase, Silfverberg, Rakell, Steel, Comtois, Terry / Lindholm, Fowler, Manson / Gibson
(8/1) > Henrique, Kase, Silfverberg, Rakell, Lindholm, Folwer, Manson, Guhle / Gibson
As it is, we are exposing a LOT of good young players. Larsson, Mahura, Jones, etc.


I put Sprong on the 4th line because I want him to have a chance to outplay Kase and Terry. If he doesnt, I think we give up on the Sprong experiment like Pitt did. AHL won't help him as he will probably produce fine down there. He needs to find consistency.

I REALLY like the Swede line. That being said, because I like Lundestrom so much, I rather him not have 2019-20 count against him or his contract. Ducks are a bubble team, not likely a Stanley Cup team. Rakell and Silf will be here next year. I rather play Steel now than Lundestrom as Steel will be 1 of top 6 Centers until Zegras is ready. The future of Zegras being 1C and Lundestrom or Steel being 2C is only a few years away.

I like Getz with Kase, but I also like him with Terry. I think Henrique and Kase have good chemistry and Henrique puts him in less dangerous situations. Getz is use to playing with power forwards and stronger guys, and Kase is just too injury prone to be that guy, Carrick is fun to watch and a great call up option. But much lower on the depth chart for me.
Dan10900 et TheJoeMan a aimé ceci.
1 oct. 2019 à 16 h 6
#12
Démarrer sujet
Jam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Jah1722
One of Jones or Comtois is sent down and Ritchie takes their spot. But I like that you have Rowney centering the 4th line. He had a career year last year and deserves the first shot at it


Agreed. More likely Comtois. I see Comtois and Lundestrom tearing up the AHL till next season. But I would be fine if he stayed up too. Rowney impressed me a lot last year. He really earned his spot and was rarely a liability. Grant can swap in when needed, but Rowney makes that 4th line stable.
1 oct. 2019 à 16 h 12
#13
Démarrer sujet
Jam
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Quoting: Max27
Get Rowney out of there and Ritchie in

And god that D is weak


Rowney is a solid 4th line guy. If he is swapping with anyone it's likely Grant.
I'm not exactly the biggest Ritchie fan to begin with, but I think in general every player this year has to earn their spot. Ritchie was okay in camp. But better than Rakell? No. Better than Jones? Not really. Better than Comtois? Meh. Better than Shore? Maybe. He will end up in the line up at some point. But I rather him not. I rather move him for a RHD.

Our D is fine. Guhle and Fowler have me excited honestly. Larsson has looked better. MDZ is there.
TheJoeMan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage