SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Interesting Take

Créé par: xexus101
Équipe: 2019-20 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 20 août 2019
Publié: 20 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Scott Darling signed to a PTO.
Once Ian Cole returns I expect one of the many Left handed Defenseman to be traded away or just buried/waived.
Connor Timmins might be ready at training camp but I feel like there are far too many rookies on that defense, and especially having to play multiple of them together.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
59 600 000 $
32 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 150 000 $
Transactions
COL
  1. Carlo, Brandon [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
LET ME KNOW BRUINS IF YOU THINK THIS IS AN OKAY RETURN
BOS
  1. Calvert, Matt (1 425 000 $ retained)
  2. Meloche, Nicolas
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Becomes 2nd round pick if Brandon Carlo signs past 19/20 season
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de COL
Logo de TOR
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $77 349 761 $0 $3 532 500 $4 150 239 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 600 000 $9 600 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
885 833 $885 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 975 000 $1 975 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
750 000 $750 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 4
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 août 2019 à 19 h 5
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Timmins is certainly not ready. After all he has been through and not playing hockey for so long the worst thing you could do is throw him in the lineup.
xexus101 a aimé ceci.
20 août 2019 à 19 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
I will be direct. No, it's not since reason #1: We're simply not trading Carlo.

Meloche will be what, top6 at best?
We don't need Calvert at all, we have enough options for our bottom 6
lol at the 3rd; worse is that COL makes playoffs
(this is the price for like 1/3 if not 1/4 of Carlo)

We don't move Carlo unless the return would be... an overpayment to get him.
Also, Carlo is a top4 D and is perfect for our second pair; replace McAvoy if injured on the first.
Leading to: $2,75M is way too low, even on a bridge deal. On a 6Y deal, he can get $4,25M so there's that.

Don't acquire him if it's to play on the 3rd pair, he's a legit 1st pair D. Monster defensively in the playoffs (and the regular season).

Remember Carlo for Landeskog few years ago? I would still not do that trade but that's personal opinion.

So forget this, just play Connauton there until Cole is back.
Pharow a aimé ceci.
20 août 2019 à 19 h 6
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
I don’t think that would get Carlo from the bruins. I love meloche but he doesn’t have the ceiling as Carlo so a 4th liner like Calvert doesn’t make up the difference then

I think Timmins would have to be moved for this to happen and that’s if he shows he’s back to old self being healthy again.

If Timmins healthy there’s no point for the avs to do the move then
20 août 2019 à 19 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Jamiepo
Timmins is certainly not ready. After all he has been through and not playing hockey for so long the worst thing you could do is throw him in the lineup.

I agree they shouldn’t rush him at all but the org hype for Timmins is stilll a real thing, if he plays well during pre season it wouldn’t shock me if he’s on the team based on how much bednar loves him and how high Sakic is on him
xexus101 a aimé ceci.
20 août 2019 à 19 h 22
#5
Démarrer sujet
xexus101
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: bhavikp27
I will be direct. No, it's not since reason #1: We're simply not trading Carlo.

Meloche will be what, top6 at best?
We don't need Calvert at all, we have enough options for our bottom 6
lol at the 3rd; worse is that COL makes playoffs
(this is the price for like 1/3 if not 1/4 of Carlo)

We don't move Carlo unless the return would be... an overpayment to get him.
Also, Carlo is a top4 D and is perfect for our second pair; replace McAvoy if injured on the first.
Leading to: $2,75M is way too low, even on a bridge deal. On a 6Y deal, he can get $4,25M so there's that.

Don't acquire him if it's to play on the 3rd pair, he's a legit 1st pair D. Monster defensively in the playoffs (and the regular season).

Remember Carlo for Landeskog few years ago? I would still not do that trade but that's personal opinion.

So forget this, just play Connauton there until Cole is back.


Meloche projects to be at least top 4 and considering Carlo would likely sign a 3-4 year deal that pick would become a 2nd which Don Sweeney has proven to be able to do damage with (specifically Brandon Carlo Sticking Out Tongue )
But I didn't realize Carlo was apparently that good, cuz I saw him playing 3rd pairing minutes for Boston. Realistically he could probably play 2nd pairing but I doubt Bednar plays Johnson 3rd pairing and definitely not Makar
Also neither Connauton nor Cole play the right side lol
20 août 2019 à 19 h 27
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,081
Mentions "j'aime": 1,433
Quoting: bhavikp27
I will be direct. No, it's not since reason #1: We're simply not trading Carlo.

Meloche will be what, top6 at best?
We don't need Calvert at all, we have enough options for our bottom 6
lol at the 3rd; worse is that COL makes playoffs
(this is the price for like 1/3 if not 1/4 of Carlo)

We don't move Carlo unless the return would be... an overpayment to get him.
Also, Carlo is a top4 D and is perfect for our second pair; replace McAvoy if injured on the first.
Leading to: $2,75M is way too low, even on a bridge deal. On a 6Y deal, he can get $4,25M so there's that.

Don't acquire him if it's to play on the 3rd pair, he's a legit 1st pair D. Monster defensively in the playoffs (and the regular season).

Remember Carlo for Landeskog few years ago? I would still not do that trade but that's personal opinion.

So forget this, just play Connauton there until Cole is back.


Carlo is a damn good defender way underrated. He was a brick in this stanley cup run. If boston move him they will ask at least for byram. He does so many thing well he’s a miniature chara but with more fluid skating. I think is offensive game will come later like chara due to is size but still he was amazing in the playoff
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
20 août 2019 à 19 h 46
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: xexus101
Meloche projects to be at least top 4 and considering Carlo would likely sign a 3-4 year deal that pick would become a 2nd which Don Sweeney has proven to be able to do damage with (specifically Brandon Carlo Sticking Out Tongue )
But I didn't realize Carlo was apparently that good, cuz I saw him playing 3rd pairing minutes for Boston. Realistically he could probably play 2nd pairing but I doubt Bednar plays Johnson 3rd pairing and definitely not Makar
Also neither Connauton nor Cole play the right side lol


21-22 mins is third pair minutes for you??
20 août 2019 à 19 h 58
#8
Démarrer sujet
xexus101
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: bhavikp27
21-22 mins is third pair minutes for you??


Never saw him play 21 min, there was a couple times I saw 16 and assumed that to be normality
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
20 août 2019 à 20 h 23
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: xexus101
Never saw him play 21 min, there was a couple times I saw 16 and assumed that to be normality


Game logs (reg season)
28
27
26-26
25
24-24-24-24
23-23-23-23-23-23-23
22-22-22-22-22-22-22-22
21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21

That's 40 of his 72 games in the regular season.

playoffs
33-24-24-24-24-23-23-23-23-22-22-22-21-21-21-21 (16/24 GP)

His lower was 16:29 in G4 STL
Lower in reg. was 16:35

He can play 22-24 mins and that's why I said he can replace McAvoy on the first pair, sometimes. He was the top pairing RD in '16-17 so
20 août 2019 à 20 h 31
#10
Démarrer sujet
xexus101
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: bhavikp27
Game logs (reg season)
28
27
26-26
25
24-24-24-24
23-23-23-23-23-23-23
22-22-22-22-22-22-22-22
21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21-21

That's 40 of his 72 games in the regular season.

playoffs
33-24-24-24-24-23-23-23-23-22-22-22-21-21-21-21 (16/24 GP)

His lower was 16:29 in G4 STL
Lower in reg. was 16:35

He can play 22-24 mins and that's why I said he can replace McAvoy on the first pair, sometimes. He was the top pairing RD in '16-17 so


In that case ya better hope Sweeney is able to get rid of that Backes contract or they're gonna lose one of them! wink
20 août 2019 à 20 h 50
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,339
I'd take Timmins over Meloche any day. Even with injury history.
20 août 2019 à 23 h 36
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,552
Mentions "j'aime": 4,570
Modifié 20 août 2019 à 23 h 46
There's no question the Bruins are going to struggle to sign both Carlo & McAvoy unless they can dump Backes (or another contract) but that offer isn't going to cut it.

Hypothetically and just to at least show something of Carlo's value, the Avs could offer Kaut plus a first and if it isn't taken they offer sheet Carlo, (and that's IF they could trade with the Panthers to get their own third back in this scenario). So let's just say the Panthers accept TOR's 3rd & their own 6th for the Avs to regain their own third. Then let's just say the Avs offer sheet Carlo at 4.5 over 7 (6.3 AAV). The Bruins will struggle to match AND keep McAvoy without a cap dump but they'd almost certainly try to arrange that cap dump PDQ. Compensation is a first and a third (which would also leave the Avs with no pick in the first three rounds of the draft but we'll disregard that for now). So the trade (Kaut plus a first) starts to look a better option to Boston but I suspect the Bruins would still turn it down. A second at best plus a bottom six grinder (much as I love Calvert) plus a B level prospect with probably a ceiling of second D pairing, more likely a third pairing D, isn't going to get it done.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage