SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Minnesota v1 - rebuild

Créé par: Roffi223
Équipe: 2019-20 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 10 août 2019
Publié: 11 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I've tried to do My homework on this... As it stands today, I would project Minnesota to finish last in the Central this upcoming season. I strongly believe that they would benefit from a rebuild, sooner rather than later. However, I've worked on two potential scenarios for fun: One being a rebuild, the other being one way of pushing for the playoffs (if the fictive management continues to put more faith in their current roster than I do).

This is the rebuild version, and I will try to motivate the trades made. I've signed Fiala, Eriksson Ek and Belpedio to extensions in both scenarios, which of course could look completely different in reality.

1) Edmonton would seem to be in desperate need for some veteran presence, some relief in terms of goals scored, and a way to maximize the role of Draisaitl. If they traded for Staal, it would be to keep Draisaitl at one wing. I think Staal would fit as a 2nd line C, giving RNH a chance to anchor the 3rd line were he's suited best. Brodin would be the D-man to trade, as he would add security to the Oilers blueline, which has been injury prone and lacked depth. Also, the contracts of Pateryn and Spurgeon are soon to be up, giving Minnesota more flexibily in terms of future cap space (as well as the choice of letting Spurgeon leave as a rental this season).
I think Yamamoto would be the guy with most upside in terms of playing 2nd line minutes and hopefully evolving in Minnesota, and the most reasonable to strive for while also recieving some draft picks. Gagner would provide some veteran presence at center, as well as giving the Oilers enough cap space to keep both Staal and Brodin. Bear is a solid prospect, you cannot have to many of them at D, and could be an acceptable long term replacement for Brodin.

2) If this was a proper, all-in rebuild, I would let Zucker leave. With 4 years left, and a reasonable cap hit for his solid 20+ goal production, he is one piece the Sharks currently lacks in terms of being a team for the playoffs. Sörensen would be seen as a way of helping Sharks with cap space, while also providing a solid alternative for the Wild and their young roster for 2 years. Blichfeld and his potential would be the real price the Sharks had to pay to aquire Zucker.

3) A rebuild would reduce the need to get rid of the Rask contract. However, having depleted their prospect pool, as well as having cap space, Columbus might be a good fit for Rask to bounce back in a 3rd line role if Minnesota would like to try to lose him. The price for Minnesota would be the picks, that Columbus would most likely want badly at this state.
Milano's time in Columbus would seem to be over, but he could benefit from a change of scenery and has got the talent. Gavrikov is a dark horse, and would further add to a rather deep prospect pool at the Minnesota defense. With the contracts of Pateryn and Spurgeon up in two/One years, having numbers in terms of young d-men could be key going forward in a rebuild.

All in all, I think this would result in a rather deep roster nevertheless, altough with future potential. If Kunin and Schultz were to backfire when given time on the 3rd line, Milano and Hartman would be waiting in the wings together with Greenway and JT Brown.

What do you think, Internet? ;) I'll publish the second version, the playoffs version, soon.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 100 000 $
21 350 000 $
2850 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Bear, Ethan
  2. Gagner, Sam
  3. Yamamoto, Kailer
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
  5. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Condition: the 2020 4th round becomes a 3rd rounder if Oilers reach playoffs this season.
EDM
  1. Brodin, Jonas
  2. Staal, Eric
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Wild retains 1,02m of Staal's salary for remaining 2 seasons.
2.
MIN
  1. Blichfeld, Joachim
  2. Sörensen, Marcus
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
3.
CBJ
  1. Rask, Victor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de EDM
Logo de MIN
Logo de OTT
Logo de MIN
2021
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2881 500 000 $69 576 840 $0 $2 200 000 $11 923 160 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
874 125 $874 125 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 835 000 $2 835 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
842 500 $842 500 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
687 500 $687 500 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
916 666 $916 666 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
874 125 $874 125 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
720 000 $720 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 août 2019 à 6 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Like the deals not really sold on the Edmonton one as Stall is 34 but I can see it going through for sure
11 août 2019 à 10 h 38
#2
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,560
Mentions "j'aime": 3,043
If they're rebuilding, giving up 2nd round picks isn't a good idea. A rebuild would take a few years minimum (more depending on what happens with Suter and Parise), so just riding out Rask's contract makes the most sense.
SociallyHawkward et Roffi223 a aimé ceci.
11 août 2019 à 18 h 19
#3
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Would you do Kieffer Bellows and a 1st rd pick for Zucker?
Roffi223 a aimé ceci.
11 août 2019 à 23 h 17
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: Isles777
Would you do Kieffer Bellows and a 1st rd pick for Zucker?


That's a tough one. I'm leaning towards no for two reasons. I think Bellows might have to settle into a 3rd/4th line NHL role, tough it's of course early to say. But given his skillset, I believe so. Also, I think NYI might end up at the top of the standings next season (thanks to their excellent defense), which would lower the value of their 1st round pick.

BUT! The 2020 draft is considered a deep one, and Bellows might prove me one give him a year or two at AHL level. For me though, it's a maybe but no. Tough one though.
11 août 2019 à 23 h 22
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: JayTea
If they're rebuilding, giving up 2nd round picks isn't a good idea. A rebuild would take a few years minimum (more depending on what happens with Suter and Parise), so just riding out Rask's contract makes the most sense.


I agree 100 %. I put that trade there simply as an alternative way of moving forward, though I agree that the necessity of trading Rask would be way lower if they choose to rebuild. I briefly mentioned it in the (lenghty) description as well wink
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage