SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Top SJS Prospects Tiers

Créé par: Ccc
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 6 août 2019
Publié: 6 août 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
https://www.capfriendly.com/users/Claesson4Norris
For the idea/ format but I changed it slightly

Tier 1 - *Elite/ guaranteed star* It’s not a hit, it’s a home run. They’re gonna be in your line up almost immediately after draft. If not, some time to cook just a little in the oven, before releasing them. They’re a dream come true for a GM.

Tier 2 - *”Blue Chip”* a top prospect in the league, they may need some time before moving up, but they’re it, they’re what you wish for in a drafted player.

Tier 3 - Stud : these guys are usually teams top prospects, they got high ceilings. They’ve got work to do, and that’s not a bad thing. You gotta get dirty sometimes and put in work. You’re gonna have a top 6 most likely on your hand eventually or a top 4 guy.

Tier 4 - Make or break : these guys are middle pack. They’re either from the above tiers and fell hard, or unfortunately have misfired so far or they’re from the below tiers trying to figure out what their career is gonna be. They got 1 season or so left to show their worth or they may get lose between the lines, cause it happens so fast nowadays. They aren’t NECESSARILY better than the tier right below but you get what I mean by make or break.

Tier 5 - Good kid : these guys are developing well, with good potential just haven’t shown that IT factor. Your either gonna work your way up to the next tier but they’ll probably be 21-23 when they’re showing their worth in the show. Stay in this tier and possibly be a top 9/4-5 pair guy. Definitely can surprise you but don’t count on a miracle here.

Tier 6 - bottom of the barrel : these guys are 4th liners or 6/7 pair guys who have a role if they can make it to the NHL, but they’re not gonna be making big bucks, filling in holes or supporting cast. By no means a bad job, but you’re not gonna cry if you trade these guys.

Tier 7 - Scraps : I mean wonders happen, Lundqvist was a 7th rounder after all and he was probably put here. But lol?? atleast these guys still make more than any of us
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Tier 1, Tier 1
169 696 969 $
Tier 2, Tier 2
169 696 969 $
Tier 3, Tier 3
169 696 969 $
Tier 4, Tier 4
169 696 969 $
Tier 5, Tier 5
169 696 969 $
Tier 6, Tier 6
169 696 969 $
Tier 7, Tier 7
169 696 969 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
    KORENAR IS IN TIER 5
    ANA
    2.
    SJS
      Definitely could use a solid look over so discussion def could change mind on guys placement so it’s not a 1 and done rating we can talk about it
      ANA
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de PHI
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de WSH
      2021
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      2022
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2481 500 000 $471 372 684 $660 750 $995 000 $-389 872 684 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Tier 2, Tier 2
      69 696 969 $69 696 969 $
      Tier 3, Tier 3
      69 696 969 $69 696 969 $
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      894 167 $894 167 $
      DD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      776 667 $776 667 $ (Bonis de performance160 000 $$160K)
      C, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
      C
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Tier 1, Tier 1
      69 696 969 $69 696 969 $
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
      DG
      UFA - 3
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Tier 4, Tier 4
      69 696 969 $69 696 969 $
      Tier 5, Tier 5
      69 696 969 $69 696 969 $
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      723 333 $723 333 $
      G
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      700 000 $700 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      827 500 $827 500 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      925 000 $925 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      735 000 $735 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      700 000 $700 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      809 167 $809 167 $
      DG
      RFA - 5
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Tier 6, Tier 6
      69 696 969 $69 696 969 $
      Tier 7, Tier 7
      69 696 969 $69 696 969 $
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      700 000 $700 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      773 333 $773 333 $ (Bonis de performance160 000 $$160K)
      C
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
      DG/DD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      736 667 $736 667 $
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      759 167 $759 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      AG, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      700 000 $700 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
      DG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      925 000 $925 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      700 000 $700 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      925 000 $925 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      780 000 $780 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
      AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      770 000 $770 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      786 667 $786 667 $
      C
      UFA - 3

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      6 août 2019 à 20 h 45
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2019
      Messages: 8,796
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
      This is kind of ridiculous. True is too high, Blichfeld is too low. There is no way you know enough about Bergmann,Knyazev,Sund,Kellman,Yurtaykin and Gallant to write them off before they have even spent any time in the system. The sharks signed them for a reason
      6 août 2019 à 20 h 46
      #2
      Burnzie88
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 734
      Mentions "j'aime": 65
      I would say Blichfeld and Dahlen are too low
      6 août 2019 à 20 h 48
      #3
      Frankyhabs
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 752
      Mentions "j'aime": 331
      I do think (base on your description) that Merkley should be in the tier 3 "stud". He is far frome a #1 defensemen and will need some work. Not saying he is bad.
      6 août 2019 à 20 h 49
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2019
      Messages: 392
      Mentions "j'aime": 286
      I think only Chekhovich and Chmelevski should be in tier 3. True should be a tier lower, and Ferraro would kinda be in the middle of 3 and 4. Sund should be in tier 6, and Spiridonov and Hamaliuk (not on the list) should be at around tier 5.
      6 août 2019 à 20 h 58
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      ? San Jose Sharks ?
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 1,141
      Mentions "j'aime": 282
      Quoting: papishark
      This is kind of ridiculous. True is too high, Blichfeld is too low. There is no way you know enough about Bergmann,Knyazev,Sund,Kellman,Yurtaykin and Gallant to write them off before they have even spent any time in the system. The sharks signed them for a reason


      No argument on those 6 names, as I said it’s not 1 and done didn’t think feel like going over all of them again.
      6 août 2019 à 20 h 59
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      ? San Jose Sharks ?
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 1,141
      Mentions "j'aime": 282
      Quoting: MJC13
      I think only Chekhovich and Chmelevski should be in tier 3. True should be a tier lower, and Ferraro would kinda be in the middle of 3 and 4. Sund should be in tier 6, and Spiridonov and Hamaliuk (not on the list) should be at around tier 5.

      Agreed on Ferraro and yeah those guys I couldn’t find so I didn’t create them.
      6 août 2019 à 21 h 0
      #7
      Démarrer sujet
      ? San Jose Sharks ?
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 1,141
      Mentions "j'aime": 282
      Quoting: Frankyhabs
      I do think (base on your description) that Merkley should be in the tier 3 "stud". He is far frome a #1 defensemen and will need some work. Not saying he is bad.


      I would say maybe we could say that from draft day but he has improved quite a bit, I agree he’s not a #1 d yet but he’s getting close
      Quoting: TheBeardOfBurns
      I would say Blichfeld and Dahlen are too low


      Personally I’m not sold on Dahlén and I just don’t think Blich is up there with the other group.
      6 août 2019 à 21 h 2
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      ? San Jose Sharks ?
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 1,141
      Mentions "j'aime": 282
      Quoting: papishark
      This is kind of ridiculous. True is too high, Blichfeld is too low. There is no way you know enough about Bergmann,Knyazev,Sund,Kellman,Yurtaykin and Gallant to write them off before they have even spent any time in the system. The sharks signed them for a reason


      I personally think true is high from my opinion, but I do agree he’s not on the same field as Chek and chmel
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage