Forums/NHL Signings

Tampa Bay Lightning signed Kevin Shattenkirk (1 Year / $1,750,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage

 

5 aoû 2019 à 16 h 37
#76
Miss the Thrashers
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 5,317
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
They moved Callahan and felt the need for more former rangers?
palhal et SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
5 aoû 2019 à 16 h 55
#77
Rejoint: nov 2018
Messages: 2,878
Mentions "j'aime": 597
I believe this signing wasn't able improving Tbay, it's more likely a signing to stop him improving a Conference rival.
5 aoû 2019 à 16 h 57
#78
Retired V2 V3 GM
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,270
Mentions "j'aime": 396
Still a great player!
5 aoû 2019 à 16 h 57
#79
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 69
Mentions "j'aime": 50
It's insane how big of a steal this is.
thelastlongbow, Zwui21 et BOLTLOVER1 a aimé ceci.
5 aoû 2019 à 17 h 06
#80
Nazaleaf
Rejoint: jan 2019
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 99
Quoting: AwesomeMatthews
WTF


Could you imagine Leafs bringing Gardiner back on a similar looking 1 year deal?! That's my dream scenario. But Shatty is a RHD and a damn good one too. Also, why in the world would Jake take a huge pay cut and lose term during an important offseason for him? Now is his time to cash in. Guess Shatty already cashed in NY so he's willing to do this.
vmark a aimé ceci.
5 aoû 2019 à 17 h 10
#81
Rejoint: déc 2017
Messages: 2,090
Mentions "j'aime": 871
Quoting: WellIDK
What flexibility for 2020? At least not anything cap related


Sergachev's not going nowhere.
5 aoû 2019 à 17 h 18
#82
Discord COL's GM
Rejoint: mar 2018
Messages: 6,979
Mentions "j'aime": 1,864
Quoting: Rangsey
Which two?


Domingue and Condon
5 aoû 2019 à 17 h 40
#83
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 53
What a loser.

"Im **** now, so I might as well join a team that really doesn't need me, and I could be really successful being ****. " Shattenkirk's dignity
5 aoû 2019 à 18 h 11
#84
best poster
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 1,999
Mentions "j'aime": 1,132
Quoting: mr_z
What a loser.

"Im **** now, so I might as well join a team that really doesn't need me, and I could be really successful being ****. " Shattenkirk's dignity


love to be bought out by the team you took a pay cut for
5 aoû 2019 à 18 h 17
#85
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 9,555
Mentions "j'aime": 2,048
Quoting: kaljakori
This guy is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit top-pairing guy and a good one, rest of the league passes and he falls to... Tampa. Because of course he does.


when was Shattenkirk ever a "legit top-pairing guy?"
palhal et CD282 a aimé ceci.
5 aoû 2019 à 18 h 37
#86
Rejoint: jui 2016
Messages: 793
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
Domingue and Condon

My bad.
Thought you were talking Dmen. :-)
BeastModeUnknown a aimé ceci.
5 aoû 2019 à 19 h 40
#87
BOLT LOVER
Rejoint: déc 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: mondo
drinking at 2 pm on a monday isn't something to brag about


It is if you beachfront watching bikinis and the occasionally wave and really sometimes forget what day of week it is ..
5 aoû 2019 à 19 h 46
#88
Rejoint: aoû 2017
Messages: 1,697
Mentions "j'aime": 527
Quoting: kaljakori
This guy is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit top-pairing guy and a good one, rest of the league passes and he falls to... Tampa. Because of course he does.


Lucic is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit 25 goal / 50 point power-forward.
Marleau is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit 25 goal / 50 point snipe show.
Seabrook is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit top-pairing defensemen.

I have some more fun facts if you'd like?
Rangsey a aimé ceci.
5 aoû 2019 à 19 h 50
#89
BOLT LOVER
Rejoint: déc 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Stop overusing the world literally .. sound like my wise ass 8th grader.. literally ..
5 aoû 2019 à 20 h 03
#90
best poster
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 1,999
Mentions "j'aime": 1,132
Quoting: BOLTLOVER1
It is if you beachfront watching bikinis and the occasionally wave and really sometimes forget what day of week it is ..


yet you're still mad online
5 aoû 2019 à 20 h 04
#91
BOLT LOVER
Rejoint: déc 2018
Messages: 1,838
Mentions "j'aime": 323
I'm a lover not a fighter ..
5 aoû 2019 à 21 h 00
#92
Rejoint: déc 2017
Messages: 480
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: drewjenks
Lucic is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit 25 goal / 50 point power-forward.
Marleau is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit 25 goal / 50 point snipe show.
Seabrook is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit top-pairing defensemen.

I have some more fun facts if you'd like?


None of those guys are signed to 1x1,75.

Learn the difference,
BOLTLOVER1 a aimé ceci.
5 aoû 2019 à 21 h 32
#93
Rejoint: aoû 2017
Messages: 1,697
Mentions "j'aime": 527
Quoting: kaljakori
None of those guys are signed to 1x1,75.

Learn the difference,


Yeah I was responding to your comments about his talent / potential .... LMAO.
5 aoû 2019 à 22 h 17
#94
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Rejoint: jui 2015
Messages: 31,197
Mentions "j'aime": 7,793
Kinda fantasy that he was a top pairing guy two years ago. Blues traded him. near the TDL in 2017 because he was their 3rd best RHD. Yeah he was good on PP...but that was all.
6 aoû 2019 à 1 h 12
#95
93in93
Rejoint: jun 2017
Messages: 160
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: kaljakori
This guy is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit top-pairing guy and a good one, rest of the league passes and he falls to... Tampa. Because of course he does.


Rest of the league didn't pass, Shattenkirk said there were 6 or 7 teams who contacted him and he chose Tampa
6 aoû 2019 à 1 h 16
#96
93in93
Rejoint: jun 2017
Messages: 160
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: BeastModeUnknown
they have no space for it.


They've got $9.4M with 21 signed, wont be hard to get compatible
6 aoû 2019 à 8 h 04
#97
Rejoint: jui 2018
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 121
Shattenkirk is a good bet at this price, and Tampa needed a RHD, as they are quite weak on the right side, but this does make their current cap situation quite tight, but they have deals they can juggle around, guys that are waivers expempt and a few contracts that aren't that huge that they can likely trade someone like paquette easily enough.

Next year is going to be tough though. They will have at least $78M committed to 15 players, with Sergechev, Cirelli, and Cernak left to sign, as well as a roster to fill. Only Killorn's contract can be traded without his permission, and between the restriction of only being able to trade him to about half of the league, and his contract being one of the worst they have on the books that won't be easy. They likely can get it done, but it will probably cost an asset. The problem is, that even after moving contract, things don't get very easy. They will have likely at least $73.5M committed to 14 guys, with 3 RFAs. If the cap is say $84M next year, that's less than $11M to sign 3 RFAs, and fill out a roster, they won't have much else they can move because of all of their full NTCs.

Tampa has done a good job of navigating fair contracts for their stars (although I really don't like Vasilevsky's contract), but they have handed out NTCs like candy to second tier guys, and that could prove a problem.
6 aoû 2019 à 8 h 59
#98
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 69
Mentions "j'aime": 50
+5.6% Corsi Rel last season on a terrible team. He had an insanely low shooting percentage at 1.4%. This guy is not much worse than he was two seasons ago.
6 aoû 2019 à 9 h 25
#99
Rejoint: mar 2017
Messages: 8,731
Mentions "j'aime": 2,186
Quoting: kaljakori
This guy is literally 2 seasons removed from being a legit top-pairing guy and a good one, rest of the league passes and he falls to... Tampa. Because of course he does.


Four years ago he was a 2nd pairing guy, since then he has played 3rd pairing. He was always sheltered behind Pietrangelo in St. Louis.
6 aoû 2019 à 9 h 25
#100
Rejoint: mar 2017
Messages: 8,731
Mentions "j'aime": 2,186
Quoting: pharrow
when was Shattenkirk ever a "legit top-pairing guy?"


Never?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Soumettre les modifications du sondage