SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Asking Price For Kreider

Créé par: TheFlamingC
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 25 juill. 2019
Publié: 25 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What is the ask
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $62 488 808 $0 $747 500 $19 011 192 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 625 000 $4 625 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
735 000 $735 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 42
#1
Brian Mohlin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 8
What's the point of the Kreider trade just to put him on the 4th line?
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 43
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 101
worry about signing tkachuk & rittich before u go out trading for rentals LOL
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 43
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
well trading for Kreider only makes sense if you want an extension...are you asking about that?
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 44
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: bdotmohls
What's the point of the Kreider trade just to put him on the 4th line?


I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not but the roster isn't filled out
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Sagecoll
well trading for Kreider only makes sense if you want an extension...are you asking about that?


Sure, what do you think an extension would cost... My guess is 6.5x8
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,260
Mentions "j'aime": 672
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Sure, what do you think an extension would cost... My guess is 6.5x8


I'd expect 7x7 or so
ChytilMania a aimé ceci.
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 47
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: hockeyfan14_
worry about signing tkachuk & rittich before u go out trading for rentals LOL


Ya, you're right. The Leafs shouldn't have gotten Kerfoot, Barrie, Ceci, Spezza, etc. They should just focus all their energy on signing Marner. Makes sense because improving your team isn't important
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 48
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: aspina25
I'd expect 7x7 or so


Okay. With the way the market is going, it's pretty good for an almost 30 goal scorer
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 49
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 101
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Ya, you're right. The Leafs shouldn't have gotten Kerfoot, Barrie, Ceci, Spezza, etc. They should just focus all their energy on signing Marner. Makes sense because improving your team isn't important


The leafs made great moves! they know how to manipulate the cap and everyone you listed does make sense for us. Trying for kreider and taking lucic doesn't make sense when you have rittich and tkachuk
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 50
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Kreider extended contract is anywhere from 6-8 mil for 5-7 years.

In terms of value:


1 Full season of Kreider = Deadline deal for Mark Stone = Your best prospect (Valimaki / Andersson) + 2nd

Kreider Extended = Your best prospect (Valimaki/Andersson) + 1st + 3rd or equivalent value

So the easy way to mock it up would be Kreider = (Your choice of Valimaki or Andersson) + 4th + Conditional 2nd (which turns into 1st if he resigns). The good news is that the potential 1st would be a 2021 pick not a 2020.
ChytilMania a aimé ceci.
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 55
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: hockeyfan14_
The leafs made great moves! they know how to manipulate the cap and everyone you listed does make sense for us. Trying for kreider and taking lucic doesn't make sense when you have rittich and tkachuk


I know the Leafs have made great moves. That's why I listed them. The goal is to improve your team and if you have an opportunity to do it then you do and worry about the rest later. In our case 2 of Stone, Brodie and Frolik are gone by the end of the offseason maybe all 3. That's 12 mil. The Flames don't have as tight of a cap situation as everyone thinks. We don't need Stone or Brodie so we can trade them and slide in Rasmus Andersson and Valimaki and Frolik is a problem in the room because he hates Peters so we can trade them and have just as good a team because our 3 d prospects, Ras, Vali and Kylington are just getting better. Brodie and Janko could be traded for Kreider to fill Frolik's gap and Dube could replace Jankowski
25 juill. 2019 à 10 h 57
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 101
Quoting: TheFlamingC
I know the Leafs have made great moves. That's why I listed them. The goal is to improve your team and if you have an opportunity to do it then you do and worry about the rest later. In our case 2 of Stone, Brodie and Frolik are gone by the end of the offseason maybe all 3. That's 12 mil. The Flames don't have as tight of a cap situation as everyone thinks. We don't need Stone or Brodie so we can trade them and slide in Rasmus Andersson and Valimaki and Frolik is a problem in the room because he hates Peters so we can trade them and have just as good a team because our 3 d prospects, Ras, Vali and Kylington are just getting better. Brodie and Janko could be traded for Kreider to fill Frolik's gap and Dube could replace Jankowski


tkachuk could get 9 million and what if rittich wants binnington money? 13 million in cap space?
25 juill. 2019 à 11 h 3
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Sagecoll
Kreider extended contract is anywhere from 6-8 mil for 5-7 years.

In terms of value:


1 Full season of Kreider = Deadline deal for Mark Stone = Your best prospect (Valimaki / Andersson) + 2nd

Kreider Extended = Your best prospect (Valimaki/Andersson) + 1st + 3rd or equivalent value

So the easy way to mock it up would be Kreider = (Your choice of Valimaki or Andersson) + 4th + Conditional 2nd (which turns into 1st if he resigns). The good news is that the potential 1st would be a 2021 pick not a 2020.


Mark Stone got 12 playoff points in 7 games, 5 more goals and 21 more points than Kreider in the season. He is not a comparable. Vali and Ras were off the table for him. We supposedly had a deal with Ottawa the night before the TDL (my guess is Kylington was involved) but the Senators decided they wanted Valimaki or Andersson so Calgary backed out at the last minute. They are not going anywhere. I think that Zuccarrello is a better comparable. Now Kreider is better so what if it was an unconditional 1st and a conditional 2nd that become a 1st if we win the Cup or something about Kreider's performance or something like that.
25 juill. 2019 à 11 h 6
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: hockeyfan14_
tkachuk could get 9 million and what if rittich wants binnington money? 13 million in cap space?


Rittich can want Binnington money but Rittich did not carry a dead last team to the Stanley Cup so he won't get it. He'll get 3 in arbitration but doubtful he hits because Flames would want a longer term deal and not a one year he will be awarded in arb. Tkachuk could get 9 but Aho is 8.5 so he won't. He'd get 9 on a 7 or 8 year but he wants 5 years so my guess is 7.75. The Flames don't actually have too tight a cap situation
25 juill. 2019 à 11 h 11
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Mark Stone got 12 playoff points in 7 games, 5 more goals and 21 more points than Kreider in the season. He is not a comparable. Vali and Ras were off the table for him. We supposedly had a deal with Ottawa the night before the TDL (my guess is Kylington was involved) but the Senators decided they wanted Valimaki or Andersson so Calgary backed out at the last minute. They are not going anywhere. I think that Zuccarrello is a better comparable. Now Kreider is better so what if it was an unconditional 1st and a conditional 2nd that become a 1st if we win the Cup or something about Kreider's performance or something like that.


I wasn't comparing Stone to Kreider. I was comparing 22 Stone games to 82 Kreider games. If you prefer a different value for Kreider that's closer over a full season...perhaps Duchene is better?

Screen-Shot-2019-07-25-at-11-08-35-AM

Though if Duchene got a 1st and a Kylington level prospect + Nikolaev level prospect + Conditional 1st at the deadline....does that mean a full season of Kreider gets more than that? And what would that more be? A better prospect? or a better pick?
25 juill. 2019 à 11 h 17
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 101
Quoting: TheFlamingC
Rittich can want Binnington money but Rittich did not carry a dead last team to the Stanley Cup so he won't get it. He'll get 3 in arbitration but doubtful he hits because Flames would want a longer term deal and not a one year he will be awarded in arb. Tkachuk could get 9 but Aho is 8.5 so he won't. He'd get 9 on a 7 or 8 year but he wants 5 years so my guess is 7.75. The Flames don't actually have too tight a cap situation


you can say all you want but the way things have been going rittich is still unsigned and could get 4 Mill and tkachuk could hold firm and ask for 9 mill
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 9
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: hockeyfan14_
you can say all you want but the way things have been going rittich is still unsigned and could get 4 Mill and tkachuk could hold firm and ask for 9 mill


Mather could hold firm and ask for a billion, there now we’ve both said something with no merit. Go read an article or two and you’d know exactly where the Flames stand on Rittich and Tkachuk.
TheFlamingC a aimé ceci.
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 10
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 403
Mentions "j'aime": 101
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Mather could hold firm and ask for a billion, there now we’ve both said something with no merit. Go read an article or two and you’d know exactly where the Flames stand on Rittich and Tkachuk.


you should go read an article lol
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 12
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: hockeyfan14_
you should go read an article lol


I mean, I have, that’s why I would mention that there are articles out there about Rittich and Tkachuk’s situations that completely contradict what you’re saying.
25 juill. 2019 à 12 h 44
#20
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,916
Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
Quoting: Sagecoll
I wasn't comparing Stone to Kreider. I was comparing 22 Stone games to 82 Kreider games. If you prefer a different value for Kreider that's closer over a full season...perhaps Duchene is better?
Though if Duchene got a 1st and a Kylington level prospect + Nikolaev level prospect + Conditional 1st at the deadline....does that mean a full season of Kreider gets more than that? And what would that more be? A better prospect? or a better pick?


These charts are hilarious, we know who the players are. We are getting Less than Trouba. Both have a couple spots in mind and want massive term. GMs know this. Nobody's handing over a Makar, Valimaki,...for one underwhelming year of Kreider
25 juill. 2019 à 18 h 32
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Sagecoll
I wasn't comparing Stone to Kreider. I was comparing 22 Stone games to 82 Kreider games. If you prefer a different value for Kreider that's closer over a full season...perhaps Duchene is better?

Screen-Shot-2019-07-25-at-11-08-35-AM

Though if Duchene got a 1st and a Kylington level prospect + Nikolaev level prospect + Conditional 1st at the deadline....does that mean a full season of Kreider gets more than that? And what would that more be? A better prospect? or a better pick?


In a futures involved trade I would only give either Kyl or a 1st and both could be paired with a conditional 1st. You could add mid-round picks and B prospects as well. For players on the team that you may want it's probably Brodie, Janko, Frolik on the table. If you want other players than who would they be?
25 juill. 2019 à 18 h 36
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: hockeyfan14_
you can say all you want but the way things have been going rittich is still unsigned and could get 4 Mill and tkachuk could hold firm and ask for 9 mill


Rittich will get a minimum of 2.6 and an absolute maximum of 3.4. Tkachuk will under no circumstances other than an 8-year deal with no trade restrictions get 9 mil. If Aho got 8.5 Tkachuk should not under any circumstances come within 0.5 mil of that on a 5 year deal. Tkachuk wants to win and if he wants to be our future captain would never hold out
25 juill. 2019 à 18 h 54
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: TheFlamingC
In a futures involved trade I would only give either Kyl or a 1st and both could be paired with a conditional 1st. You could add mid-round picks and B prospects as well. For players on the team that you may want it's probably Brodie, Janko, Frolik on the table. If you want other players than who would they be?


I don't think Brodie or Janko have much value to us at all. And Frolik we're not resigning so his value is better maximized elsewhere.

If you're trying to get a top 15 LW and then saying "you can't have the only 2 Top 50 prospects we actually have" it's tough to do.

I'm trying to think of something that would work. If you were trading Valimaki what would you want in return prospect wise from us?
26 juill. 2019 à 11 h 56
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Sagecoll
I don't think Brodie or Janko have much value to us at all. And Frolik we're not resigning so his value is better maximized elsewhere.

If you're trying to get a top 15 LW and then saying "you can't have the only 2 Top 50 prospects we actually have" it's tough to do.

I'm trying to think of something that would work. If you were trading Valimaki what would you want in return prospect wise from us?


There is a 0% chance he gets traded but I'll entertain it and try proposing something fair. Adam Fox if he was willing to play for us. He is pretty fussy and thinks that as a 20 year old he had the right to tell not one but two NHL franchises to trade him without doing anything in the NHL so he may not want to play for us especially having already demanded a trade from Calgary. If he didn't want to play for us which is almost 100% likely the outcome of that scenario than maybe Kravstov, Chytil or one of Shesterkin or Georgiev with an addition by you guys for Shestorkin or Georgiev. Kravstov and Chytil could be one for one or Calgary could add a little bit to make Kravstov work
26 juill. 2019 à 11 h 58
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Sagecoll
I don't think Brodie or Janko have much value to us at all. And Frolik we're not resigning so his value is better maximized elsewhere.

If you're trying to get a top 15 LW and then saying "you can't have the only 2 Top 50 prospects we actually have" it's tough to do.

I'm trying to think of something that would work. If you were trading Valimaki what would you want in return prospect wise from us?


And, yes it is hard to do but Calgary thinks that Ras or Vali could win a Norris if they reach their ceiling so I think they'll hold on to them
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage