SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Pittsburgh Penguins signed Zach Aston-Reese (2 Years / $1,000,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


22 juill. 2019 à 12 h 2
#1
Zach Aston-Reese has signed a new contract with the Pittsburgh Penguins.
Contrat standard
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Jim Rutherford
Durée: 2 ans
Valeur: 2 000 000 $
Statut à l’échéance du contrat: RFA (Arb)
% Cap Info-bulle: 1,23
Contrat signé avec: Logo de Penguins de PittsburghPenguins de Pittsburgh
Date de signature: 22 juill. 2019
Source: CapFriendly

Zach Aston-Reese a signé un contrat de 2 ans d'une valeur de 2 000 000 $ avec les Penguins de Pittsburgh, le 22 juill. 2019. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 1 000 000 $.

SAISONClauseCap hitInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBonis de performanceInfo-bulleBonis de signatureInfo-bulleSalaire de baseInfo-bulleSalaire totalInfo-bulleSalaire mineuresInfo-bulle
2019-201 000 000 $1 000 000 $0 $0 $1 000 000 $1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
2020-211 000 000 $1 000 000 $0 $0 $1 000 000 $1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
TOTAL2 000 000 $2 000 000 $0 $0 $2 000 000 $2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
Offre qualificativeInfo-bulle: 1 000 000 $
Icône d'arbitrage demandé ARBITRAGE: Ce contrat a été signé suite à une demande de cas porté en arbitrage
22 juill. 2019 à 12 h 7
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 5,012
Mentions "j'aime": 3,523
I'm a little surprised that Rutherford didn't offer him 6 years.
Rideordie, doublem24, leafsFan1996 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 12 h 15
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 284
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Is now officially a valuable asset
22 juill. 2019 à 12 h 17
#4
AwesomeMatthews
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,381
Mentions "j'aime": 1,013
Surprised they didn't have to trade him for cap reasons
22 juill. 2019 à 12 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: AwesomeMatthews
Surprised they didn't have to trade him for cap reasons


Still might, will probably end up trading Rust.
KubaH et Boubou79 a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 12 h 39
#6
Been fired as a ACGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 16
Mentions "j'aime": 1
IDK, I've always felt as though ZAR isn't the type of player that the Pens should be after. Maybe its the dollar amount, but I am not sold on this signing as of yet.
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 0
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 564
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: AwesomeMatthews
Surprised they didn't have to trade him for cap reasons


If somehow Pettersson signs at 1.2-1.3 mil x 1-2 years, the Pens technically don't need to trade anyone to stay under the cap.
This was decent value for ZAR. The Tanev deal completely ruined any cap flexibility the Pens had.
The_Madhawk a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 36
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,573
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Quoting: vic997
If somehow Pettersson signs at 1.2-1.3 mil x 1-2 years, the Pens technically don't need to trade anyone to stay under the cap.
This was decent value for ZAR. The Tanev deal completely ruined any cap flexibility the Pens had.


only if they have like 0 extra players, which won't happen. And Pettersson won't take that... Two big ifs
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 32
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 564
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: bhavikp27
only if they have like 0 extra players, which won't happen. And Pettersson won't take that... Two big ifs


I agree. Pettersson should not take a penny under 2 mil. A 3 x 2.5 AAV icontract is perfect tbh.
Someone is likely being moved and I think I'm mentally ready for GMJR to ruin my day by moving everything else but Jack Johnson.
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 47
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: vic997
If somehow Pettersson signs at 1.2-1.3 mil x 1-2 years, the Pens technically don't need to trade anyone to stay under the cap.
This was decent value for ZAR. The Tanev deal completely ruined any cap flexibility the Pens had.


That's not even remotely true. The penguins could fit everyone under the cap without trading anyone.

A little under what I thought he would get. It's a good deal for the penguins.
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 51
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 564
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: pharrow
That's not even remotely true. The penguins could fit everyone under the cap without trading anyone.

A little under what I thought he would get. It's a good deal for the penguins.


Aren't you basically agreeing with what I just said lol ?
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 59
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: vic997
Aren't you basically agreeing with what I just said lol ?


They could play him 2 mil a year right now and fit everyone under the cap.
He would easily fit, no issues.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 15
#13
riles23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Quoting: pharrow
They could play him 2 mil a year right now and fit everyone under the cap.
He would easily fit, no issues.


Please explain how you are gonna make that work with paying Pettersson 2mil? Your plan is to just send down DeSmith (won't clear waivers) and Johnson?
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 21
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: riles23
Please explain how you are gonna make that work with paying Pettersson 2mil? Your plan is to just send down DeSmith (won't clear waivers) and Johnson?


who cares if DeSmith clears waivers. You act like that's losing something.
on top of it, I don't think anyone picks him up. He's not that good.
They planned on Jarry being the backup this year to begin with. That's why he was signed to a 1 way deal.

and yes, just send JJ and DeSmith down and you are there.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 39
#15
riles23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Quoting: pharrow
who cares if DeSmith clears waivers. You act like that's losing something.
on top of it, I don't think anyone picks him up. He's not that good.
They planned on Jarry being the backup this year to begin with. That's why he was signed to a 1 way deal.

and yes, just send JJ and DeSmith down and you are there.


It is losing the backup for nothing. How do you figure they planned on Jarry being the backup this year when they JUST gave DeSmith a 3 year deal @ 1.25? How can you honestly say "he's not that good"? Do a quick research on his stats and compare them to Jarry then we can talk again.
Reeds77 a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 44
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: riles23
It is losing the backup for nothing. How do you figure they planned on Jarry being the backup this year when they JUST gave DeSmith a 3 year deal @ 1.25? How can you honestly say "he's not that good"? Do a quick research on his stats and compare them to Jarry then we can talk again.


They signed Jarry to a 1 way deal on the 2nd year. AKA they wanted him to back up.
The only reason DeSmith was the backup last year and not Jarry is they wanted jarry to play more in WBS. Jarry is the better goal tender.
I could care less about the stats. If you watched DeSmith play you know he's good enough to lose by 1. He never wins a tight game. On top of it his PK average is awful.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 46
#17
riles23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Quoting: pharrow
They signed Jarry to a 1 way deal on the 2nd year. AKA they wanted him to back up.
The only reason DeSmith was the backup last year and not Jarry is they wanted jarry to play more in WBS. Jarry is the better goal tender.
I could care less about the stats. If you watched DeSmith play you know he's good enough to lose by 1. He never wins a tight game. On top of it his PK average is awful.


You don't care about stats ... lol okay then. So they probably signed DeSmith to a 3yr deal paying him 1.25mil cus they don't want him to play. Great logic.

DeSmith might be good enough to lose by 1 but Jarry isn't even good enough to have the chance to lose by 1.
Reeds77 a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 49
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: riles23
You don't care about stats ... lol okay then. So they probably signed DeSmith to a 3yr deal paying him 1.25mil cus they don't want him to play. Great logic.

DeSmith might be good enough to lose by 1 but Jarry isn't even good enough to have the chance to lose by 1.


That's not true at all. Jarry will be just fine.
They always knew they would move or lose DeSmith.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 55
#19
riles23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Quoting: pharrow
That's not true at all. Jarry will be just fine.
They always knew they would move or lose DeSmith.


you are saying DeSmith's stats don't matter, the contract they gave him is cus they don't want to keep him and Jarry is better. You don't back up anything you say with facts or even valid points, you speak in hypotheticals and nonsense
Reeds77 a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 57
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: riles23
you are saying DeSmith's stats don't matter, the contract they gave him is cus they don't want to keep him and Jarry is better. You don't back up anything you say with facts or even valid points, you speak in hypotheticals and nonsense


Just because they signed DeSmith doesn't mean they intended on keeping him. Especially at that rate.
I'm sorry you don't get that. If they need to fit under the cap, that's how they do it. Period.
They aren't going to trade Rust to keep DeSmith or whatever non sense you want to keep going with.
By DeSmith, been nice knowing you, but he will either be in WBS or gone unless JJ is traded and they aren't giving anything up to trade him because they don't need to.
22 juill. 2019 à 16 h 31
#21
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Wow only 1 million, gotta love it.
oneX a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 16 h 46
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,156
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Quoting: pharrow
I could care less about the stats.


Holy ****, GMJR is that you?
ComYog et riles23 a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 16 h 49
#23
ComYog
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 111
Quoting: pharrow
Just because they signed DeSmith doesn't mean they intended on keeping him. Especially at that rate.
I'm sorry you don't get that. If they need to fit under the cap, that's how they do it. Period.
They aren't going to trade Rust to keep DeSmith or whatever non sense you want to keep going with.
By DeSmith, been nice knowing you, but he will either be in WBS or gone unless JJ is traded and they aren't giving anything up to trade him because they don't need to.


So unless Jarry has a huge increase in performance he has the worse record, but we still want to give up DeSmith (the better goalie) cause stats dont matter.
22 juill. 2019 à 16 h 49
#24
ComYog
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 111
Quoting: datools
Holy ****, GMJR is that you?


A like isnt enough, I LOVE THIS
datools a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 16 h 50
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,156
Mentions "j'aime": 258
@Pharrow, I think DeSmith is better than Price. Forget the stats, look at how thicc DeSmith is. You have no idea how much I believe in his powers. That's what makes him better than Price
Reeds77 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage