SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

after fatal trade

Créé par: calgaryman
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 20 juill. 2019
Publié: 20 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
11 800 000 $
12 500 000 $
68 500 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 220 875 $0 $747 500 $7 279 125 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
730 833 $730 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 juill. 2019 à 13 h 54
#1
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Gave Rittich too little and same with Mangiapane.
And gave a little too much to Tkachuk.
oneX et BootBoi a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2019 à 14 h 9
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
I don't see a way Rittich signs for less than Talbot
BootBoi a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2019 à 14 h 14
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Come off the ledge. Calgary is just fine, they swapped third liners and got a guy that fills a third line role better than Neal was going to.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2019 à 14 h 15
#4
BootBoi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,276
Mentions "j'aime": 365
Flames better watch out 4 rich Sens regarding Matthew.
M.Tkacuk is the best sheet target remaining.
20 juill. 2019 à 14 h 34
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Come off the ledge. Calgary is just fine, they swapped third liners and got a guy that fills a third line role better than Neal was going to.


If I'm not mistaken, the whole world said that Lucic isn't NHL worthy anymore. Just funny to me that Flames fans now try to make it seem like they traded a 3rd liner for a 3rd liner. Before this trade every one on Flames Nation plus fans of other teams called Lucic a bum. Now that he's on your team, he's all the sudden NHL caliber lol

On a side note, I think he will fit better on your team than Neal though, but just be realistic.. 2 months ago everyone didn't see him as an NHL player.
20 juill. 2019 à 14 h 47
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
If I'm not mistaken, the whole world said that Lucic isn't NHL worthy anymore. Just funny to me that Flames fans now try to make it seem like they traded a 3rd liner for a 3rd liner. Before this trade every one on Flames Nation plus fans of other teams called Lucic a bum. Now that he's on your team, he's all the sudden NHL caliber lol

On a side note, I think he will fit better on your team than Neal though, but just be realistic.. 2 months ago everyone didn't see him as an NHL player.


I don't disregard that at all, no one has really changed their mind on that I don't think. For the Flames it is a 3rd line swap, Neal would have been on our third line next year and Lucic will be this year, I personally see it as a better fit, are there better options, absolutely, I would have paid a pretty penny to have that be Kassian for Neal++. There have just been so many Flames fans that have jumped on the fire Treliving bandwagon which is absolutely mental. In terms of an on ice product the Flames have not improved or gotten worse, In terms of a contract there are smarter people than myself that looked into that and made that call.
20 juill. 2019 à 22 h 44
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: BootBoi
Flames better watch out 4 rich Sens regarding Matthew.
M.Tkacuk is the best sheet target remaining.


Flames are one Frolik or Brodie trade away from being able to pay Tkachuk whatever he wants. Flames reduced their cap hit by half a million.. why weren’t you posting this before the Lucic trade?
BootBoi a aimé ceci.
22 juill. 2019 à 13 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 157
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Come off the ledge. Calgary is just fine, they swapped third liners and got a guy that fills a third line role better than Neal was going to.


Ha, I wouldnt say that....Id so much rather have Neal than Lucic on my team. Especially seeing how seriously Neal is taking his offseason
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 2
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Savard96
Ha, I wouldnt say that....Id so much rather have Neal than Lucic on my team. Especially seeing how seriously Neal is taking his offseason


You don’t know what you’re saying then. Neal will push for top 6 in Edmonton our pout and be awful again in Calgary. There isn’t a spot for Neal in Calgary that would make all parties happy that was evident in the playoffs. Troy Brouwer also took off seasons seriously.. along with every other aging NHL player that wants to stay relevant, that’s a horrid argument.
22 juill. 2019 à 14 h 23
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 157
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
You don’t know what you’re saying then. Neal will push for top 6 in Edmonton our pout and be awful again in Calgary. There isn’t a spot for Neal in Calgary that would make all parties happy that was evident in the playoffs. Troy Brouwer also took off seasons seriously.. along with every other aging NHL player that wants to stay relevant, that’s a horrid argument.


Im not basing my argument completely off of that.... theyre both washed up players (Not even old players because theyre 31) who have significantly dropped off their play in the last couple years. But pushing top 6 in edmonton isnt saying anything, id say thats a pretty horrid argument.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 3
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Savard96
Im not basing my argument completely off of that.... theyre both washed up players (Not even old players because theyre 31) who have significantly dropped off their play in the last couple years. But pushing top 6 in edmonton isnt saying anything, id say thats a pretty horrid argument.


You didn’t even make a point in that last reply.. Lucic fits better in Calgary, Neal would have been the equivalent because there isn’t a spot in the top six where he wants to play. That’s why to my original point, they swapped third liners and Lucic will fill that role better than Neal would have.
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 25
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 157
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
You didn’t even make a point in that last reply.. Lucic fits better in Calgary, Neal would have been the equivalent because there isn’t a spot in the top six where he wants to play. That’s why to my original point, they swapped third liners and Lucic will fill that role better than Neal would have.


I didnt feel the need to explain myself when all you said is basically "lucic is better than neal" even though few people would agree with that. I guess if youd want to have alittle harder hitting forward who could be used to throw the body around then ya...lucic is your guy. But youd probably be using him with Bennett and Jankowski...in that case, id prefer to have Neal because hes better offensively
22 juill. 2019 à 15 h 47
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Savard96
I didnt feel the need to explain myself when all you said is basically "lucic is better than neal" even though few people would agree with that. I guess if youd want to have alittle harder hitting forward who could be used to throw the body around then ya...lucic is your guy. But youd probably be using him with Bennett and Jankowski...in that case, id prefer to have Neal because hes better offensively


At no point did I say he was better than Neal. Neal literally played the majority of the year last year with Bennett and Jankowski and we saw the results of that. Ideally Lucic Dube and Bennett are a line that bangs and crashes and scores garbage goals off of Dube’s puck moving ability and possession. You clearly haven’t read or thought about anything and you’re putting out arguments for arguments sake.
23 oct. 2019 à 7 h 4
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 157
Mentions "j'aime": 24
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
You didn’t even make a point in that last reply.. Lucic fits better in Calgary, Neal would have been the equivalent because there isn’t a spot in the top six where he wants to play. That’s why to my original point, they swapped third liners and Lucic will fill that role better than Neal would have.


Yo remember when you were completely wrong....clown
23 oct. 2019 à 11 h 58
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: Savard96
Yo remember when you were completely wrong....clown


Hahahahahaha remember when you thought about something from three months ago on a website that means nothing!! Holy crap, find a hobby pal!

Either way, the point I made there still stands, Calgary made a swap of third liners, it's exactly where Neal would have played in Calgary and there is a 0% chance Neal would be on the tear he is right now if he stayed ion Calgary. Lucic has fit better in Calgary already than Neal moping around the ice last year. If you want to talk about clowning, you literally brought up a point from three months ago that still absolutely stands.
Points I made above, to make this extremely clear for your dense little head:
- Lucic fits better in Calgary, check
- There is no spot for Neal in Calgary's top six, check
- Calgary made a swap of player on their third line, check

Talk to you again in three months when you continually think about me!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage