SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(EDM/CGY) - Lucic (12.5% retained) & conditional 2020 3rd for Neal

Who won the trade?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 4
#1
Trade confirmed: Calgary Flames - Edmonton Oilers
Détails de la transaction
Les Flames de Calgary font l’acquisition de:
Logo de Flames de Calgary
Milan Lucic (750 000 $ retenus - 12.5%) · 5 250 000 $5 250 000 $0 $
Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM - #84 - Kirill Kirsanov) [Conditionnel]*
*Conditions: Le choix est transféré si James Neal marque 21 buts et que Milan Lucic marque 10 buts ou moins que Neal durant la saison 2019-20.

Résultat: En raison de la saison écourtée, la LNH a statué qu'Edmonton allait devoir transférer son choix de 3e ronde en 2020 ou 2021.
Somme: 5 250 000 $5 250 000 $0 $
Variation: -500 000 $
Variation: -500 000 $
Variation: -69 000 000 $
Les Oilers d'Edmonton font l’acquisition de:
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
James Neal · 5 750 000 $5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
Somme: 5 750 000 $5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
Variation: +500 000 $
Variation: +500 000 $
Variation: +5 750 000 $
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 5
#2
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,915
Mentions "j'aime": 4,649
@Banks @Jarvis any information on the conditions?
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 8
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,359
Mentions "j'aime": 1,578
Quoting: rangersandislesfan
@Banks @Jarvis any information on the conditions?


If Neal scores 21 goals, AND Lucic scores 10 less, Calgary receives the pick
dad, rangersandislesfan, Boubou79 and 4 others a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,359
Mentions "j'aime": 1,578
Edmonton moves the worst contract in the league. For me it's a win for them
vibesmvx, Brian2016, rollie1967 and 3 others a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
I thought CGY is Stanley contender......

Second trade here on CapFriendly in a row that should be forgotten as soon as possible,....
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 12
#6
AwesomeMatthews
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,381
Mentions "j'aime": 1,013
What a horrible trade for Calgary
toque, Brian2016, Kelandry and 3 others a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 13
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 500
I think Neal has a better chance of bouncing back, at least to the 20 goal range.
rollie1967, SpaghettiPasta, The_Madhawk and 2 others a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 115
Mentions "j'aime": 34
LuCiC pRoViDeS pRoTeCtIoN fOr GaUdReAu
toque, SpaghettiPasta, hawksfan881965 and 5 others a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 23
#9
i hope ur hungry now
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 2,411
Mentions "j'aime": 978
Quoting: toque
If Neal scores 21 goals, AND Lucic scores 10 less, Calgary receives the pick


So if Neal has a bounce back year, and lucic doesn't,pick is extanged
slomo a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 29
#10
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,196
Mentions "j'aime": 5,555
I don't hate this for Calgary as much as many others here. A bunch of the stats nerds are divided on the players themselves but many see Lucic as the one more likely to bounce back. Add in the possible pick and the fact that he is cheaper and who knows.

On the flipside if McDavid can make Neal a player then lookout.
Overall it's not an awful trade by any stretch of the imagination
CD282, OldNYIfan et dad a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 35
#11
i hope ur hungry now
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 2,411
Mentions "j'aime": 978
Quoting: Random2152
I don't hate this for Calgary as much as many others here. A bunch of the stats nerds are divided on the players themselves but many see Lucic as the one more likely to bounce back. Add in the possible pick and the fact that he is cheaper and who knows.

On the flipside if McDavid can make Neal a player then lookout.
Overall it's not an awful trade by any stretch of the imagination


If luchic can't have a good year on the wing of Jesus, he won't have a good year on Petersons line
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 35
#12
i hope ur hungry now
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 2,411
Mentions "j'aime": 978
Quoting: SpaghettiPasta
If luchic can't have a good year on the wing of Jesus, he won't have a good year on Petersons line


Idk I'm stupid
bwar et Earfgang a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 46
#13
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,155
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Laudan
I thought CGY is Stanley contender......

Second trade here on CapFriendly in a row that should be forgotten as soon as possible,....


Calgary needed to get rid of Neal and shed some salary. What makes this deal a loss is that it seems lucic still has his nmc intact and needs to be protected.... very bad for the upcoming expansion draft.
Brian2016, Trickster, Zaffers and 6 others a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 49
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 5,012
Mentions "j'aime": 3,523
CGY won't make the playoffs next season. They've not improved in any facet of the game this summer and several of their divisional opponents have improved. They also way overachieved last year as everyone had career seasons. That won't happen again. I don't understand for one second why they made this trade. Neal had a terrible season but could certainly bounce back next season, especially while playing on McDavid's and/or Draisaitl's line and PP. He scored 20+ goals in 9 straight seasons until last year. Lucic has been on a drastic downward spiral since arriving in EDM, scoring a pathetic 6 goals last year. He's basically worthless at this point. EDM wins this trade by a mile and then some.
19 juill. 2019 à 21 h 51
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 5,012
Mentions "j'aime": 3,523
Quoting: Danny272
LuCiC pRoViDeS pRoTeCtIoN fOr GaUdReAu


Lucic isn't providing protection for Gaudreau. That's never gonna happen. Lucic is a 4th line player. They'll never be on the ice together. Never.
19 juill. 2019 à 22 h 40
#16
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,915
Mentions "j'aime": 4,649
Modifié 19 juill. 2019 à 22 h 47
Quoting: toque
If Neal scores 21 goals, AND Lucic scores 10 less, Calgary receives the pick


You mean Calgary doesn't get the pick then?

Edit: Never mind, i forgot that Neal plays for Edmonton and Lucic for Calgary now lol.
19 juill. 2019 à 22 h 44
#17
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
I am iffy on this trade.

Does saving 500k really worth this?
Neal much more likely to bounce back over Lucic should be a factor in the decision for this too.
oneX et rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 22 h 57
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
accidental comment
habs_fan123 et SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 23 h 0
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Brian2016
Lucic isn't providing protection for Gaudreau. That's never gonna happen. Lucic is a 4th line player. They'll never be on the ice together. Never.


Quoting: Danny272
LuCiC pRoViDeS pRoTeCtIoN fOr GaUdReAu


Help
19 juill. 2019 à 23 h 8
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,069
Mentions "j'aime": 2,198
If Neal plays with McDavid he'll hit 30 + goals, pick him up in your NHL Fantasy Pool Draft.
19 juill. 2019 à 23 h 12
#21
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,546
Mentions "j'aime": 11,169
to be honest, more trades need convoluted conditional picks.

like you get a 7th if the player you traded has a relative corsi above like 5 or something.
rebecca, Exeko, SpaghettiPasta and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 23 h 15
#22
i hope ur hungry now
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 2,411
Mentions "j'aime": 978
Quoting: Brian2016
Lucic isn't providing protection for Gaudreau. That's never gonna happen. Lucic is a 4th line player. They'll never be on the ice together. Never.


When someone talks like that it's sarcasm
TheFlamingC a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 23 h 17
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,744
Mentions "j'aime": 2,601
Quoting: Trickster
I am iffy on this trade.

Does saving 500k really worth this?
Neal much more likely to bounce back over Lucic should be a factor in the decision for this too.


Yeah I don't know what Treliving was thinking here.
Maybe protection for Gaudreau? But how much did he protect McDavid? Not much...as I remember it.
19 juill. 2019 à 23 h 20
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 677
Mentions "j'aime": 271
Edmonton wins this HUGE! Unless there is something about Neal that we dont know (chronic injury, cancer in the room), getting rid of Lucic is a plus, and while Neal may never get 30 again- 20 is very doable, especially if he gets top 6 minutes.
19 juill. 2019 à 23 h 20
#25
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: Trickster
I am iffy on this trade.

Does saving 500k really worth this?
Neal much more likely to bounce back over Lucic should be a factor in the decision for this too.


This trade isn't nearly as bad for Calgary as everyone thinks/says it is. Everybody has to step back and look at the math.

Calgary and Edmonton are not New York or Los Angeles, or Toronto. Neal's contract was/is all salary, equally spread. Thus the Flames owed Neal $23 million over the next four years. In contrast, Lucic's contract was front-loaded and there was a $3 million signing bonus that Edmonton just paid, so Lucic is owed a total of $16 million by Calgary for the same period. Now subtract the retention ($3 million), and Calgary saves $10 million in real cash by this trade. Now $10 million to us sitting in the comfort of our armchairs at home may not seem important, but to the Calgary GM it means that he can offer a free agent next summer a $2.5 million signing bonus in every year on a four-year contract -- money he didn't have before, but which may mean the difference between being able to sign Matt Duchene or Artemi Panarin and being able to sign Ryan Dzingel. So although Edmonton may be the winner on the ice, Calgary is the winner at the bank.
Brian2016, Oggsford_Blues, erikljunggren and 7 others a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage