SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lucic and Cap clearing

Créé par: kcoop821
Équipe: 2019-20 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 19 juill. 2019
Publié: 19 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
67 500 000 $
22 800 000 $
21 850 000 $
1950 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Lucic, Milan (750 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
2.
OTT
  1. Stone, Michael
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 008 375 $0 $665 000 $8 491 625 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
755 833 $755 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
735 000 $735 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 juill. 2019 à 20 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,063
Mentions "j'aime": 2,196
Less term for Tkachuk for that price. I'm thinking agents are looking to stay away from what McDavid, Draisaitl and Eichel did by signing for 8 yrs. All 3 of those contracts will be bargains in 2 years time (with 5-6 seasons remaining). Short term is the way to go.
19 juill. 2019 à 20 h 9
#2
Stitch
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 306
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Mangiapane should be in lineup
19 juill. 2019 à 20 h 12
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,580
I simply cannot see the reasoning behind the Lucic deal. Maybe it will make more sense to me in the morning, but how does a third-round pick help them achieve a better result this season than they got last year?

Maybe there's a locker-room story we don't know.
19 juill. 2019 à 20 h 16
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I simply cannot see the reasoning behind the Lucic deal. Maybe it will make more sense to me in the morning, but how does a third-round pick help them achieve a better result this season than they got last year?

Maybe there's a locker-room story we don't know.


I think you look at production comparisons last year and it’s an absolute wash. In terms of on ice performance and contract aside Calgary swapped third liners, gained toughness, gained cap space and a pick. Neal didn’t fit in Calgary, him and Peters were visibly upset with each other in the playoffs and he would have been strapped to the third line.
I think one big thing to look at is if Calgary had Lucic last year, you don’t see Hamonic miss a ton of time with a broken jaw from a much bigger player in Gudbranson
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 20 h 20
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,580
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
I think you look at production comparisons last year and it’s an absolute wash. In terms of on ice performance and contract aside Calgary swapped third liners, gained toughness, gained cap space and a pick. Neal didn’t fit in Calgary, him and Peters were visibly upset with each other in the playoffs and he would have been strapped to the third line.
I think one big thing to look at is if Calgary had Lucic last year, you don’t see Hamonic miss a ton of time with a broken jaw from a much bigger player in Gudbranson


Well, okay, I see your point. Thanks.
19 juill. 2019 à 20 h 21
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Well, okay, I see your point. Thanks.


Given I have my rose colour glasses on.. haha it’s crap for crap at the end of the day.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2019 à 20 h 53
#7
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,545
Mentions "j'aime": 12,303
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
I think you look at production comparisons last year and it’s an absolute wash. In terms of on ice performance and contract aside Calgary swapped third liners, gained toughness, gained cap space and a pick. Neal didn’t fit in Calgary, him and Peters were visibly upset with each other in the playoffs and he would have been strapped to the third line.
I think one big thing to look at is if Calgary had Lucic last year, you don’t see Hamonic miss a ton of time with a broken jaw from a much bigger player in Gudbranson


Yeah Gudbranson would never of smashed Hamonic's face in if the Flames had Lucic cause Lucic would've been chasing Leipsic around the ice slashing him in the back of the legs, that would've kept Gudbranson in his place... ?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage