SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bowmans Connection 20

Créé par: cmcnamed
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2019
Publié: 13 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 250 000 $
13 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Danault, Phillip
  2. Fleury, Cale
  3. Tatar, Tomas (1 800 000 $ retained)
  4. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
MTL
  1. Dach, Kirby
  2. Perlini, Brendan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Seabrook, Brent (875 000 $ retained)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
  5. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Petry, Jeff (2 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
MTL
  1. Anisimov, Artem
  2. Saad, Brandon
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
MTL
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de SJS
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 052 519 $0 $3 490 000 $14 447 481 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juill. 2019 à 16 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 5,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,659
MTL decline both trades. Dach is the only value coming back, but we are losing a top3 Dman, Top 6 winger, 2nd line center, a B prospect in Fleury for a prospect.... and we're taking Seabrook ? Oh we got Saad, sorry.
13 juill. 2019 à 16 h 41
#2
N/a
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 131
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Trash
13 juill. 2019 à 17 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
Sauceboss
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 458
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: hawksfan881965
Trash


Elaborate.
13 juill. 2019 à 20 h 4
#4
N/a
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 131
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: cmcnamed
Elaborate.


Not worth the effort lmao. Absolute garbage for both sides.
13 juill. 2019 à 21 h 1
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 340
Mentions "j'aime": 96
Quoting: cmcnamed
Elaborate.


Hawks got lucky in picking 3rd overall. They were willing to move back to 10 if someone took Seabrook. No dice. Sure they get 2 players in your deal. Tatar had a career year last year. But he had a really down year the year prior. Danault should be a 3c. Dach may be that right now. Why would the Hawks want to trade the best prospect they have just to shed dump a contract when there could very well be a compliance buyout coming. Why would Montreal dump 2 useful players for 1 prospect and 1 cap dump and a player that everyone is unsure about in Perlini.
14 juill. 2019 à 12 h 13
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Rusty_Shackelford
Hawks got lucky in picking 3rd overall. They were willing to move back to 10 if someone took Seabrook. No dice. Sure they get 2 players in your deal. Tatar had a career year last year. But he had a really down year the year prior. Danault should be a 3c. Dach may be that right now. Why would the Hawks want to trade the best prospect they have just to shed dump a contract when there could very well be a compliance buyout coming. Why would Montreal dump 2 useful players for 1 prospect and 1 cap dump and a player that everyone is unsure about in Perlini.


Considering how much hawk fans (including myself) hate dach and that he was picked over turcotte or byram, we’d love it if he was the difference in getting seabrook outta Chicago.
cmcnamed a aimé ceci.
14 juill. 2019 à 12 h 50
#7
Démarrer sujet
Sauceboss
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 458
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: HatterTParty
Considering how much hawk fans (including myself) hate dach and that he was picked over turcotte or byram, we’d love it if he was the difference in getting seabrook outta Chicago.


I agree - incentive for Chicago to let go of their recent high pick while still re-cooping most short term value from Montreal.
14 juill. 2019 à 12 h 52
#8
Démarrer sujet
Sauceboss
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 458
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: Rusty_Shackelford
Hawks got lucky in picking 3rd overall. They were willing to move back to 10 if someone took Seabrook. No dice. Sure they get 2 players in your deal. Tatar had a career year last year. But he had a really down year the year prior. Danault should be a 3c. Dach may be that right now. Why would the Hawks want to trade the best prospect they have just to shed dump a contract when there could very well be a compliance buyout coming. Why would Montreal dump 2 useful players for 1 prospect and 1 cap dump and a player that everyone is unsure about in Perlini.


In this scenario Montreal gets Caufield and Dach from 2019 while letting go of long-term secondary pieces.
Ultimate sell-high move which will result in a weaker team short term.
14 juill. 2019 à 16 h 47
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 340
Mentions "j'aime": 96
Quoting: HatterTParty
Considering how much hawk fans (including myself) hate dach and that he was picked over turcotte or byram, we’d love it if he was the difference in getting seabrook outta Chicago.


How many times have you seen any of the three play?
14 juill. 2019 à 17 h 37
#10
Démarrer sujet
Sauceboss
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 458
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: Rusty_Shackelford
How many times have you seen any of the three play?


To be fair, both were consensus higher picks than Dach prior to the draft.
14 juill. 2019 à 21 h 15
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 340
Mentions "j'aime": 96
Quoting: cmcnamed
To be fair, both were consensus higher picks than Dach prior to the draft.


So what? Scheifle was a bottom third first round mock. Chevyldayoff almost got laughed out of the building when he made the pick. Everyone thought 3-8 was about the same this year. Some even thought Dach was the better pick. So it wasn't unanimous. I didn't like the pick either, but I'm not going to be upset over players I've never seen. Funny enough, the knock on both players after being drafted was skating.
14 juill. 2019 à 22 h 22
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Rusty_Shackelford
How many times have you seen any of the three play?


Quoting: cmcnamed
To be fair, both were consensus higher picks than Dach prior to the draft.


I’ve seen turcotte a few times and he is ridiculously competitive and his physique is very similar to Crosby (5’11” 195 lbs turcotte, 5’11” 200 lbs. Crosby). He has amazing scoring instincts, great speed, and great two way play, albeit for his age. These traits will continue to grow as well.

Having said that, I still wanted byram more because of his number one d potential. I haven’t watched him live but am blown away by his instincts both offensive and defensive.

Then there’s dach........ what can I say? Good hands? Good playmaking I guess? Doesn’t know how to use his size effectively? Can’t skate like marquee nhlers these days? Dach is a player stuck in 2007. If he ends up like mark scheifele, I’m okay with him, but if he’s like Ryan Johansen or Ryan getzlaf, no thanks.

In conclusion, I literally don’t expect anything from dach because I don’t hold much regard for him. Turcotte will take time, but I’d be fine with that because it’s all about following the process. Byram may need a year in juniors too, but again, no need to rush. Dach is gonna be rushed in my mind because Bowman’s job depends on him. If he gets 50-60 points in a year, I’ll be amazed, cuz I don’t expect from him. I just hope we finish dead last so bowman can be fired and we have a chance at a true number 1 center lafrenerre. (I know I spelled that wrong)
15 juill. 2019 à 0 h 27
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Devils advocate: since having maatta, de Haan, Murphy, seabs, and Keith means we trade jokiharju, shouldn’t we trade Dach since we got Toews, strome, and Anisimov? Especially since clearly Stan hates promising youth. Huh? Huh? Thoughts???? I know I’m on to something!!!!!!!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage