SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Risto

Créé par: hgregg
Équipe: 2019-20 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 12 juill. 2019
Publié: 12 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 750 000 $
43 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Russell, Kris
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de OTT
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 646 999 $0 $2 457 500 $2 853 001 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
675 000 $675 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 835 000 $2 835 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
720 000 $720 000 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 juill. 2019 à 6 h 20
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 172
Mentions "j'aime": 14
That’s not to bad... maybe a little high on the buffalo trade. I’d hate to give up both Bear and the first.
12 juill. 2019 à 6 h 55
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 504
Mentions "j'aime": 191
You add a good amount of value there but Lucic is a deal breaker for me. We're already dealing with Okposo's nasty contract, I've got no interest in adding one that's even worse.

Not to mention that most of the Sabres' fanbase absolutely despises Lucic.
GMTD et puckhead6130 a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2019 à 7 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,638
Mentions "j'aime": 14,424
Yea, we arent taking lucic.

That's ridiculous
GMTD a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2019 à 7 h 51
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,958
Mentions "j'aime": 7,726
Quoting: Shootica
You add a good amount of value there but Lucic is a deal breaker for me. We're already dealing with Okposo's nasty contract, I've got no interest in adding one that's even worse.

Not to mention that most of the Sabres' fanbase absolutely despises Lucic.


Sorry, Okposo's contract is worse than Lucic's: https://theathletic.com/1070877/2019/07/11/by-the-numbers-a-look-at-the-10-worst-contracts-in-hockey/
GMTD a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2019 à 8 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 504
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Modifié 12 juill. 2019 à 8 h 25


I disagree, they're just about identical contracts but I think Okposo is the better player now and has more potential to bounce back than Lucic does, simply because I don't think he was fully back from his health scare last season.

But either way it's semantics. They're both awful contracts and we don't want to have one let alone take on the other.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2019 à 8 h 46
#6
Meow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,619
Mentions "j'aime": 671


Lucic's is definitely worse. Okposo still put up 3rd line numbers. Lucic is just... yuck.
12 juill. 2019 à 8 h 58
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,958
Mentions "j'aime": 7,726
Quoting: Smithcd995
Lucic's is definitely worse. Okposo still put up 3rd line numbers. Lucic is just... yuck.


Go read the article.

"Contract No. 2 from the hellscape summer of 2016. Many would put Lucic as worse than Okposo, and that’s mighty fair given he’s a worse player with a larger negative surplus value. What’s working in Lucic’s favour is a wider range of uncertainty than Okposo, giving him a slightly better chance to bounce back. His individual offensive numbers are much weaker, but his play-driving numbers are a little stronger, albeit still weak overall.

Honestly, there’s no sense splitting hairs with those two – neither are worth their compensation. At their price, the expectation is 5.9 wins over the next four years. My model has both at less than zero."
Smithcd995 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2019 à 9 h 4
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 504
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Quoting: CD282
Go read the article.

"Contract No. 2 from the hellscape summer of 2016. Many would put Lucic as worse than Okposo, and that’s mighty fair given he’s a worse player with a larger negative surplus value. What’s working in Lucic’s favour is a wider range of uncertainty than Okposo, giving him a slightly better chance to bounce back. His individual offensive numbers are much weaker, but his play-driving numbers are a little stronger, albeit still weak overall.

Honestly, there’s no sense splitting hairs with those two – neither are worth their compensation. At their price, the expectation is 5.9 wins over the next four years. My model has both at less than zero."


Man, it's an opinion piece. Just because it's published in the Athletic doesn't make it gospel.

It's perfectly valid to see either of those contracts as the worse of the two, as Luszczyszyn literally writes out in that quote.

Personally, I think the odds of Okposo showing improvement two years after an incredibly serious health scare are greater than the odds of Lucic turning his regression around, so I'd rather have him. And to me Okposo is the better player in the first place.

Either way, it doesn't matter because they're both objectively bad contracts.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
12 juill. 2019 à 9 h 45
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,223
Mentions "j'aime": 6,214
I like lucic better, he had a place in the league at one time, i dont resent that he murdered ryan miller, i resent that we didnt have a team built to respond. All that said, lucic was never a great skater and the game has passed him by. Okposo is an awful contract, but hes still an nhl player- i mean hes a 4th liner at this point.
12 juill. 2019 à 10 h 31
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,958
Mentions "j'aime": 7,726
Quoting: sabres89
Okposo is an awful contract, but hes still an nhl player- i mean hes a 4th liner at this point.


Are you insinuating that Lucic isn't a 4th line player? Because he is.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage