SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lucic

Créé par: battadan
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 2 juill. 2019
Publié: 2 juill. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
weird idea that might be good for both sides (i'm a hawk fan though).
trade seabs to Edmonton for Lucic. add whatever you'd like to add on either side to make it fair in your eyes. here is my justification:

Edmonton:
-lose a forward that is absolutely not effective anywhere in that lineup.
- gain a 3 time Stanley Cup winner who will slot in the 4-6 spot.
- as much as we say he is old, he is still a great dman to have on your team (cap hit aside)
- Edmonton is in win now mode. Seabs can definitely help over the next 2-3 years.

Chicago:
- save $875k/year
- one less year of contract
- we have so many expected NHL dman coming the next couple years i'd rather trade him, than have him in the press box
- i think Edmonton would have to add a pick or prospect to make this even.

Let me know your thoughts.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3750 000 $
3750 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CAR)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (COL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (COL)
3.
CHI
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de COL
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de COL
Logo de CAR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $64 655 853 $0 $3 915 000 $16 844 147 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 juill. 2019 à 17 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Why exactly are we giving up a 2nd? I'm sorry but I truly would rather have lucic then Seabrook.. Seabrook is brutal lucic at least provides hits lol
2 juill. 2019 à 17 h 14
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 151
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: Dylan1995
Why exactly are we giving up a 2nd? I'm sorry but I truly would rather have lucic then Seabrook.. Seabrook is brutal lucic at least provides hits lol


I'm glad a Edmonton fan commented. that's interesting to hear your side. idk many Oiler fans that like him in any way. so if the pick was going from chicago to Oilers would that balance it in your mind? or just a hard no on this premise?
2 juill. 2019 à 17 h 15
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: battadan
I'm glad a Edmonton fan commented. that's interesting to hear your side. idk many Oiler fans that like him in any way. so if the pick was going from chicago to Oilers would that balance it in your mind? or just a hard no on this premise?


Honestly I just wouldnt even move either of them they both wouldnt waive there nmc lucic likely ends up in either Vancouver or staying in Edmonton he is what he is an next year we dont have cap problems just gotta stay patient
battadan a aimé ceci.
2 juill. 2019 à 17 h 19
#4
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,600
Mentions "j'aime": 1,021
Not worth it. Seabs produces more than Lucic and Seabs is a dman. I'll take the guy that produces 20-30 points on defense than a forward that produces at the same rate. If we trade Murphy to an in division contender, they are paying way more than that.
2 juill. 2019 à 17 h 23
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 151
Mentions "j'aime": 45
ha funny how each fan prefers their player. i like to think that means its pretty close to a equal trade proposal.

CFMAN- you don't think its worth it to open a spot for one of our D prospects? i would entertain the idea. i agree seabs is better than lucic in many ways, but could be a unqie solution only avail this, or next year.
2 juill. 2019 à 20 h 54
#6
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,600
Mentions "j'aime": 1,021
Quoting: battadan
ha funny how each fan prefers their player. i like to think that means its pretty close to a equal trade proposal.

CFMAN- you don't think its worth it to open a spot for one of our D prospects? i would entertain the idea. i agree seabs is better than lucic in many ways, but could be a unqie solution only avail this, or next year.


I think it is worth it, if they are ready. I think the best we can do is hold out until the expansion draft and then have Seattle pick someone like Murphy. While Seabs is definitely the weak link, theres no justifiable way for anyone to take on his contract without us dishing some major piece out.
3 juill. 2019 à 2 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Because of the NMC, i can´t se a scenario where Sebs would leave. It would be really hard to convince him to be traded.
3 juill. 2019 à 9 h 17
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 151
Mentions "j'aime": 45
Quoting: erikljunggren
Because of the NMC, i can´t se a scenario where Sebs would leave. It would be really hard to convince him to be traded.


the only reason i could see him waive it is two reasons:
1. he is from Vancouver- so be nice and close to home
2. be on a team with MCDavid.. not the biggest sacrifice.
erikljunggren a aimé ceci.
3 juill. 2019 à 12 h 45
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 334
Mentions "j'aime": 92
Quoting: battadan
the only reason i could see him waive it is two reasons:
1. he is from Vancouver- so be nice and close to home
2. be on a team with MCDavid.. not the biggest sacrifice.


1. Seabs stated before he wants to be part of the hawks organization even after he retires, Plus Van and Edm is not really the same.
2. I'm sure he can DVR McDavid and watch him sunday night, I don't why would he want to play with him. Playing in CAN and especially in town that has nothing but hockey, can be very overwhelming for a guy that in decline. He will be criticized night in and night out, by press, by fans, by kids and pets. I don't know if he wants that.
If I were to bet, I'd say he waives his NMC for Seattle draft, but they won't pick him, he will retires in 1-2 years after that. (or he might go on LTIR in few years for the symptoms of old age)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage