SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cup 2020

Créé par: KylesAssistant
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 28 juin 2019
Publié: 28 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Cup... in 2020
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
28 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
2.
TOR
  1. Miller, Colin
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
3.
TOR
  1. Spurgeon, Jared
  2. Zucker, Jason
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Kadri, Nazem
  2. Liljegren, Timothy
  3. Zaitsev, Nikita
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
4.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
Logo de VGK
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 472 199 $0 $0 $27 801 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 18
#1
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,767
Mentions "j'aime": 1,625
To much for marner. If its 2 years it should be around 6
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 30
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 38
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Marner is 10x better than Matthews, there's no way he signs for just two years, he'll go somewhere else and get them the cup.
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 912
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: BoBo67
Marner is 10x better than Matthews, there's no way he signs for just two years, he'll go somewhere else and get them the cup.


Lol, Matthews is a two way centre who can put up 50 goals. He is a generational talent and Marner is a superstar, there is a difference. Marner got his points playing with another generational talent in Tavares. Matthews put up his points playing really with 3rd liners as he barely played with Nylander.

He likely doesn't sign for 2 years, but he is not better then Matthews
28 juin 2019 à 15 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 235
Mentions "j'aime": 50
Quoting: nchest
Lol, Matthews is a two way centre who can put up 50 goals. He is a generational talent and Marner is a superstar, there is a difference. Marner got his points playing with another generational talent in Tavares. Matthews put up his points playing really with 3rd liners as he barely played with Nylander.

He likely doesn't sign for 2 years, but he is not better then Matthews


Both players are highly elite, and arguments could be made for either side because of all their positive attributes.

Matthews' goal scoring abilities are generational, but he's no where near being considered a 2-way centre - he can't even kill penalties and his defending skills and coverage abilities are mediocre at best. Matthews, though, does put up great numbers on his own which is very impressive.

Marner complements players extremely well, and in just three years has now gotten several players career highs in points and goals (Hyman, JVR, Tavares, Kadri, and Bozak). I've seen this narrative before (i.e., it's only cause he plays with Tavares) and my counter-argument would be that for the first time Marner got put on a line with someone who has the same level of hockey IQ that he has. They played off of each other extremely well and both hit career highs.

Two years would never happen - too much to risk if an injury occurs. It'll be somewhere between 5-6 years so he can have another massive contract opportunity in his prime. And Marner is totally entitled for wanting that, as Dubas set the precedent for the Matthews' deal by giving him 5 years at 11.6 million AAV. People shouldn't hate on Marner - be frustrated at Dubas for allowing RFAs to out-leverage him when he actually held all the power in the first place (i.e., no arb rights, etc.).
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage