SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Toronto Maple Leafs signed Andreas Johnsson (4 Years / $3,400,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


28 juin 2019 à 12 h 35
#1
Andreas Johnsson has signed a new contract with the Toronto Maple Leafs.
Contrat standard (prolongation)
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Kyle Dubas
Durée: 4 ans
Valeur: 13 600 000 $
Statut à l’échéance du contrat: UFA
% Cap Info-bulle: 4,17
Contrat signé avec: Logo de Maple Leafs de TorontoMaple Leafs de Toronto
Date de signature: 28 juin 2019
Source: CapFriendly

Andreas Johnsson a signé un contrat de 4 ans d'une valeur de 13 600 000 $ avec les Maple Leafs de Toronto, le 28 juin 2019. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 3 400 000 $.

SAISONClauseCap hitInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBonis de performanceInfo-bulleBonis de signatureInfo-bulleSalaire de baseInfo-bulleSalaire totalInfo-bulleSalaire mineuresInfo-bulle
2019-203 400 000 $3 400 000 $0 $4 300 000 $700 000 $5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
2020-213 400 000 $3 400 000 $0 $1 000 000 $2 600 000 $3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
2021-223 400 000 $3 400 000 $0 $1 750 000 $750 000 $2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
2022-23M-NTC3 400 000 $3 400 000 $0 $1 750 000 $750 000 $2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
TOTAL13 600 000 $13 600 000 $0 $8 800 000 $4 800 000 $13 600 000 $13 600 000 $
DÉTAILS DE LA CLAUSE: Clause de non-échange limitée en vigueur à partir de 2022-23: Le joueur soumet une liste de 10 équipes où il refuse d'être échangé.
SOURCE: CapFriendly
28 juin 2019 à 12 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Its done....as many of us predicted ( Danault )....have fun gloaters with offer-sheets and 5M contracts
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 12 h 47
#3
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
To everyone that said 4 million per, take a good look at that number
Random2152 et oneX a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 12 h 59
#4
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: Trickster
To everyone that said 4 million per, take a good look at that number


is 600k really the difference between a good contract and a bad contract?
Earth a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 0
#5
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,047
Mentions "j'aime": 3,752
Quoting: ThatGuy
is 600k really the difference between a good contract and a bad contract?


Due to cap situation, yes.
Curtas_Glencrosby, JonJon, Random2152 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 19
#6
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 7,036
Mentions "j'aime": 4,429
Quoting: Trickster
Due to cap situation, yes.


Yeah, Marner would not accept 6.4 million, but now that TOR have 6.9 of cap space to offer him, smooth sailing from here... wink
ThatGuy et SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,717
Mentions "j'aime": 543
Quoting: Trickster
To everyone that said 4 million per, take a good look at that number


A lot of people were claiming his cap-hit would be 4 million on a 1-2 year contract and close to 5 million for anything longer.

I was annoyed with Dubas after the Matthews signing ... but these deals (Johnsson + Kapanen) are a good recovery.

He should also get some credit for re-signing so many guys with cap-hits under 800K:

$775,000 - Moore
$775,000 - Petan
$750,000 - Rosen
$750,000 - Sparks
$700,000 - Borgman
$700,000 - Hutchinson
$675,000 - Gauthier
$675,000 - Holl
$675,000 - Kaskisuo

I feel like he's improving ... maybe he started tuning out Paul Dreger?
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 21
#8
Black Lives Matter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 29,916
Mentions "j'aime": 4,649
Good value.
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 28
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,717
Mentions "j'aime": 543
Quoting: jpsnow13
Yeah, Marner would not accept 6.4 million, but now that TOR have 6.9 of cap space to offer him, smooth sailing from here... wink


I think you forgot to put Horton on LTIR .... wink

So that $6,900,000 is more like $12,240,000 in cap space .

And replacing Brown with ... Petan / Bracco / Mikheyev / Marchment / Engvall / Korshkov ... will push it up to $13,500,000 ish.

Which will likely make the team better in itself ... while also netting an asset in return.
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 31
#10
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: ThatGuy
is 600k really the difference between a good contract and a bad contract?


When it is 18% of the contract yes it is. 600k on top of a 10m contract is nothing, 600k on a 3.4m contract means much more.
Trickster, Random2152 et PrisonBull a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 34
#11
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: drewjenks
A lot of people were claiming his cap-hit would be 4 million on a 1-2 year contract and close to 5 million for anything longer.

I was annoyed with Dubas after the Matthews signing ... but these deals (Johnsson + Kapanen) are a good recovery.

He should also get some credit for re-signing so many guys with cap-hits under 800K:

$775,000 - Moore
$775,000 - Petan
$750,000 - Rosen
$750,000 - Sparks
$700,000 - Borgman
$700,000 - Hutchinson
$675,000 - Gauthier
$675,000 - Holl
$675,000 - Kaskisuo

I feel like he's improving ... maybe he started tuning out Paul Dreger?


I’m not sure why people are so upset by the Matthews contract. Do you remember how he started the season before his injury? I would have liked to see more term on that contract but it was pretty much a blank cheque for Matthews. When it comes to a franchise C who is one of the best goal scorers in the league you make him happy and you keep him here for his whole career.
Trickster et Random2152 a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 54
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,717
Mentions "j'aime": 543
Quoting: Jamiepo
I’m not sure why people are so upset by the Matthews contract. Do you remember how he started the season before his injury? I would have liked to see more term on that contract but it was pretty much a blank cheque for Matthews. When it comes to a franchise C who is one of the best goal scorers in the league you make him happy and you keep him here for his whole career.


Yeah I agree ... but my thought process before the signing was that Matthews cap-hit would be equal to Tavares (possibly less).

To me it felt like he disrespected Tavares' a bit ... the dude was "the biggest UFA signing in decades" and there was a bidding war for his services.

Why you gotta one up your boy like that Matthews?
28 juin 2019 à 13 h 59
#13
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: drewjenks
Yeah I agree ... but my thought process before the signing was that Matthews cap-hit would be equal to Tavares (possibly less).

To me it felt like he disrespected Tavares' a bit ... the dude was "the biggest UFA signing in decades" and there was a bidding war for his services.

Why you gotta one up your boy like that Matthews?


I had Matthews between 10.5-11m before the 18/19 season. After what he brought last year and what he showed he can do(with rookie linemates). I was like “well back up the Brinks truck”. The only way dubas could have failed that negotiation is by not having it signed by July 1st. Offersheets don’t happen, but if mathews made it to rfa he would have received multiple sheets. His price would have been something the leafs could not afford. We have him for 5 years if he proves that he can be healthy and make it look like nhl 19 on rookie mode then break the bank again and make his second contract the 8 year retirement plan.
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 6
#14
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: Jamiepo
When it is 18% of the contract yes it is. 600k on top of a 10m contract is nothing, 600k on a 3.4m contract means much more.


Does that mentality apply to entry-level contracts to?

750k vs 885k
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 10
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,717
Mentions "j'aime": 543
Quoting: Jamiepo
I had Matthews between 10.5-11m before the 18/19 season. After what he brought last year and what he showed he can do(with rookie linemates). I was like “well back up the Brinks truck”. The only way dubas could have failed that negotiation is by not having it signed by July 1st. Offersheets don’t happen, but if mathews made it to rfa he would have received multiple sheets. His price would have been something the leafs could not afford. We have him for 5 years if he proves that he can be healthy and make it look like nhl 19 on rookie mode then break the bank again and make his second contract the 8 year retirement plan.


Matthews = Without a doubt the greatest Mexican hockey player of all time ... and not just because I can't name number 2.
SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 12
#16
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Modifié 28 juin 2019 à 14 h 21
Quoting: ThatGuy
Does that mentality apply to entry-level contracts to?

750k vs 885k


Too a much lesser extent yes. Leafs saved about 2-3m in cap space signing Moore, Borgman, sparks, Hutchinson, Rosen and petan to one way deals.

The difference between 600k and 130k is what it is but if you do 5 times you have enough to add a player to your roster.
Trickster et Random2152 a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 15
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,717
Mentions "j'aime": 543
Modifié 28 juin 2019 à 14 h 21
Quoting: ThatGuy
Does that mentality apply to entry-level contracts to?

750k vs 885k


You're living up to your name champ.

"That guy" spews nonsense for reactions ...
"That guy" just puked on my girlfriends leg ...
"That guy" just picked a fight at my wedding ...
"That guy" is naked for some reason ...

Etc.
Random2152 a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 15
#18
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: drewjenks
Matthews = Without a doubt the greatest Mexican hockey player of all time ... and not just because I can't name number 2.


Scott Gomez...
drewjenks et MoreOfAnIslesGuy a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 19
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,717
Mentions "j'aime": 543
Quoting: Jamiepo
Scott Gomez...


OMG you're right scream

But I don't think we've been allowed to mention him since that petition by Habs fans.
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 26
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: Jamiepo
I’m not sure why people are so upset by the Matthews contract. Do you remember how he started the season before his injury? I would have liked to see more term on that contract but it was pretty much a blank cheque for Matthews. When it comes to a franchise C who is one of the best goal scorers in the league you make him happy and you keep him here for his whole career. I had Matthews between 10.5-11m before the 18/19 season.


As we all did.....Eichel comparison.

So my beef with it is term...could live with 8 x 11,634, which would be exactly what he should earn ( if we transfer McDavids contract being signed in Jan 2019 would be 13,7M worth with inflation ). "Helping" TML with shorter term is bollocks for me, he just wants out asap for 19M per Season....and thats my resentment against him from fan base point of view.
28 juin 2019 à 14 h 57
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 334
Mentions "j'aime": 92
Quoting: drewjenks
I think you forgot to put Horton on LTIR .... wink

So that $6,900,000 is more like $12,240,000 in cap space .

And replacing Brown with ... Petan / Bracco / Mikheyev / Marchment / Engvall / Korshkov ... will push it up to $13,500,000 ish.

Which will likely make the team better in itself ... while also netting an asset in return.


wow, excellent. The only problem you need like 3 good D to even be competitive, so at least $6-8 mil need to be spend there.
28 juin 2019 à 15 h 18
#22
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: drewjenks
You're living up to your name champ.

"That guy" spews nonsense for reactions ...
"That guy" just puked on my girlfriends leg ...
"That guy" just picked a fight at my wedding ...
"That guy" is naked for some reason ...

Etc.


That escalated quickly laugh
drewjenks a aimé ceci.
28 juin 2019 à 15 h 19
#23
Sports and Tacos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 601
Quoting: Jamiepo
Too a much lesser extent yes. Leafs saved about 2-3m in cap space signing Moore, Borgman, sparks, Hutchinson, Rosen and petan to one way deals.

The difference between 600k and 130k is what it is but if you do 5 times you have enough to add a player to your roster.


Yeah, that's fair enough. Looking big picture
28 juin 2019 à 15 h 24
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 5,012
Mentions "j'aime": 3,523
I still just don't see this team as being very competitive in the playoffs. They still lack so much on the backend. They're obviously one of the elite offensive teams in the league, but you can't outscore your way to the Cup. Every single year we learn how difficult and different the playoffs are from the regular season.

Tampa has had the same problems. You're not gonna win playoff games 6-5. And this Leafs team, as presently constructed, will not win deep into the playoffs. They'll never win the big 1-0 game or 2-1 in 2OT game. They're too soft, undisciplined, and I know I'll get heat for saying this: poorly coached by Mike Babcock.
28 juin 2019 à 15 h 59
#25
AwesomeMatthews
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,381
Mentions "j'aime": 1,013
Quoting: Laudan
Its done....as many of us predicted ( Danault )....have fun gloaters with offer-sheets and 5M contracts


Overpaid
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage