Forums/NHL Signings

Vancouver Canucks signed Alexander Edler (2 Years / $6,000,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage

 

20 jun 2019 à 10 h 27
#1
Alexander Edler has signed a new contract with the Vancouver Canucks.
CONTRAT STANDARD (PROLONGATION)
COMPARER CE CONTRAT
DURÉE: 2 ANNÉES
STATUT À L’ÉCHÉANCE DU CONTRAT: UFA
CONTRAT SIGNÉ AVEC: Canucks de VancouverCanucks de Vancouver
VALEUR: 12 000 000 $
% DU C.H. : 7,55
DATE DE SIGNATURE: 20 juin 2019
SAISONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV BONIS DE PERF. BONIS DE SIGN. SALAIRE DE BASE SALAIRE TOTAL SALAIRE DES LIGUES MINEURES
2019-20NMC6 000 000 $6 000 000 $0 $6 000 000 $1 000 000 $7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
2020-21NMC6 000 000 $6 000 000 $0 $4 000 000 $1 000 000 $5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
TOTAL12 000 000 $12 000 000 $0 $10 000 000 $2 000 000 $12 000 000 $12 000 000 $
SOURCE: CapFriendly
20 jun 2019 à 10 h 30
#2
Go Jets Go!
Rejoint: mar 2018
Messages: 1,487
Mentions "j'aime": 465
Modifié 20 jun 2019 à 11 h 34
Wow, at first I thought 6 million was a very high AAV, but for 2 years this is a excellent deal for both sides.
20 jun 2019 à 10 h 30
#3
The evil stats guy
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 4,962
Mentions "j'aime": 2,259
Well the term is certainly fine. Benning clearly had to sacrifice on the AAV to get it. Canucks aren't in cap hell so this should be fine for them overall.

Considering how Benning usually does with FA, I'd call this a win for him.
Club_de_Hockey_le_Canadien, BlueSeeker, BurgerBoss and 6 others a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 10 h 35
#4
Rejoint: jan 2018
Messages: 5,442
Mentions "j'aime": 2,241
Bit high, but worth it to get him on just the two years.
SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 10 h 42
#5
Rejoint: jan 2019
Messages: 481
Mentions "j'aime": 133
i think this is the ideal contract for both sides, VAN gives up money (which they have plenty of rn) and Edler gives up term, and agrees to being exposed at the expansion. this is a win/win
SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 10 h 43
#6
Wqrrior
Rejoint: fév 2019
Messages: 3,259
Mentions "j'aime": 657
I think it was originally 3x5.5, so i'm happy to sacrifice the extra year for .5 in cap.
Finally something to show that Benning can sign people at their actual value.
SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 10 h 45
#7
rangersandislesfan
Rejoint: mar 2017
Messages: 27,262
Mentions "j'aime": 3,072
Canucks had cap space and made it work. Good signing.
Boubou79 et SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 10 h 57
#8
Habs/Pens fan
Rejoint: oct 2017
Messages: 834
Mentions "j'aime": 258
So far one of the few good signings for decent players. The Canucks don't have many cap problems for the next few years and the term is just prefect.
Boubou79 a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 11 h 17
#9
Rejoint: avr 2018
Messages: 79
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Played very well last season. Short enough contract with not a big overpayment. Benning did good with that one.
Boubou79 a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 11 h 28
#10
AwesomeMatthews
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 806
Mentions "j'aime": 655
Quoting: Rooney
Wow, at first I thought 6 million was a very AAV, but for 2 years this is a excellent deal for both sides.


I agree
Rooney a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 12 h 03
#11
Rejoint: fév 2019
Messages: 1,243
Mentions "j'aime": 565
Well those 2 years allow him to be the ideal mentor for Hughes until he fully developps
Boubou79 a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 12 h 19
#12
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 8,500
Mentions "j'aime": 1,748
this is a solid signing. They couldn't go longer than 2 years because of the youth on the team and the age of the player. He's a 1st pairing guy for them so 6 million AVV is fine. You have to pay good players to fill those roles.
20 jun 2019 à 12 h 36
#13
Blues GM v4
Rejoint: nov 2016
Messages: 8,196
Mentions "j'aime": 2,535
It's better to give more AAV than more term. Kudos to Benning for not giving him the extra term
20 jun 2019 à 12 h 44
#14
Below Market Value
Rejoint: nov 2015
Messages: 1,251
Mentions "j'aime": 1,088
Quoting: canucks_Fan_53
i think this is the ideal contract for both sides, VAN gives up money (which they have plenty of rn) and Edler gives up term, and agrees to being exposed at the expansion. this is a win/win


And there's a good chance he doesn't get selected by Seattle since he'll be a UFA and he wouldn't have to sign with them anyway.
canucks_Fan_53 et Boubou79 a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 13 h 17
#15
Hugh Hefner of CF
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,552
Mentions "j'aime": 2,167
Only 2 years
Wow, win
Boubou79 et oneX a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 13 h 59
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Rejoint: jui 2015
Messages: 30,138
Mentions "j'aime": 7,371
Quoting: DoctorBreakfast
And there's a good chance he doesn't get selected by Seattle since he'll be a UFA and he wouldn't have to sign with them anyway.


It's amazing how worried so many folks are about the Seattle draft...they might lose a player, yikes.
20 jun 2019 à 14 h 05
#17
I just need sauce
Rejoint: oct 2017
Messages: 2,131
Mentions "j'aime": 852
Quoting: AwesomeMatthews
I agree


how does this affect the leafs
20 jun 2019 à 15 h 08
#18
Rejoint: avr 2018
Messages: 79
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Quoting: palhal
It's amazing how worried so many folks are about the Seattle draft...they might lose a player, yikes.


It's more the wheeling and dealing to keep key players that more GMs were worried about. Look back at the Vegas one and the trades that went down by some of the teams.
20 jun 2019 à 15 h 39
#19
Rejoint: jan 2019
Messages: 110
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: EmperorFun
It's more the wheeling and dealing to keep key players that more GMs were worried about. Look back at the Vegas one and the trades that went down by some of the teams.


This.

It amazes me how completely aloof some people are to the costs of not having an eye on the Expansion Draft when signing contracts in the 2 years heading up to an expansion draft.
Especially after having witnessed all the moves and picks that Vegas stole during their expansion.

If you put yourself in a situation where a potentially key young player must be left exposed due to handing out too many NMC's... its gonna cost you one way or another.

Why not be a proactive GM and look and plan ahead of time?

ORRRRR just keep being aloof and stick your head in the sand singing the soundtrack of LaLaLand and laugh at everyone talking about the Expansion Draft.
Boubou79 a aimé ceci.
20 jun 2019 à 15 h 58
#20
Rejoint: jan 2019
Messages: 4,068
Mentions "j'aime": 1,444
I honestly don't like this deal.

It's only 2 years, but now they have to protect a 34 YO in the Expansion draft meaning they are going to have to expose a decent prospect or decent defensemen in the draft. Whatever floats their boat I guess.
20 jun 2019 à 16 h 21
#21
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Rejoint: jui 2015
Messages: 30,138
Mentions "j'aime": 7,371
Quoting: YvanF
This.

It amazes me how completely aloof some people are to the costs of not having an eye on the Expansion Draft when signing contracts in the 2 years heading up to an expansion draft.
Especially after having witnessed all the moves and picks that Vegas stole during their expansion.

I guess thinking should be if you give a player a NMC, he should so good that he isn't going to be exposed. Then the Flyers did the promise to Hayes.
20 jun 2019 à 16 h 59
#22
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 61
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Yet another player to be overpaid. Lucky for the Canucks it's only 2 years.
20 jun 2019 à 17 h 24
#23
Rejoint: déc 2017
Messages: 1,972
Mentions "j'aime": 825
My favorite deal thus far this summer. Eberle second.
20 jun 2019 à 18 h 28
#24
Rejoint: mar 2017
Messages: 248
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: DoctorBreakfast
And there's a good chance he doesn't get selected by Seattle since he'll be a UFA and he wouldn't have to sign with them anyway.


By agreeing to being exposed he won't have to be protected.
rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
21 jun 2019 à 10 h 02
#25
Rejoint: fév 2016
Messages: 1,094
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: HabsForEver
I honestly don't like this deal.

It's only 2 years, but now they have to protect a 34 YO in the Expansion draft meaning they are going to have to expose a decent prospect or decent defensemen in the draft. Whatever floats their boat I guess.


Yeah Edler agreed to be exposed in the expansion draft. It was one of the key point for the Canucks in this signing. He got a partial NTC with part of that being exposure in the expansion draft. And probably why Edler got as much as $6M.
rollie1967 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Soumettre les modifications du sondage