SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tear everything apart

Créé par: ChicagoGM
Équipe: 2019-20 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 11 juin 2019
Publié: 11 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
this is just for fun, some trades or signings maybe unrealistic
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
21 550 000 $
32 550 000 $
13 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Cousins, Nick [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
2.
LAK
  1. Aubé-Kubel, Nicolas [Droits de RFA]
PHI
  1. Carter, Jeff
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (LAK)
3.
LAK
  1. Bernard-Docker, Jacob [Liste de réserve]
  2. Duclair, Anthony [Droits de RFA]
  3. Formenton, Alex
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
OTT
  1. Quick, Jonathan
Détails additionnels:
Underpayment? Overpayment?
4.
LAK
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (SJS)
5.
LAK
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (MIN)
6.
LAK
  1. Crouse, Lawson [Droits de RFA]
ARI
  1. Kovalchuk, Ilya
  2. Lizotte, Blake
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
Probably not a trade that either team would want to do, but again. This is just for fun
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de WSH
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2020
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de ARI
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 000 000 $67 134 584 $0 $132 500 $15 865 416 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
759 167 $759 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 893 750 $1 893 750 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
745 000 $745 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juin 2019 à 13 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
Lmao that Quick Trade is horrible. Why would Ottawa give up that much for a past his prime goalie? Especially when we're going to be a bottom of the league anyway. Even if Ottawa did need him that's WAY too much.
11 juin 2019 à 13 h 54
#2
Démarrer sujet
ChicagoGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 61
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Lmao that Quick Trade is horrible. Why would Ottawa give up that much for a past his prime goalie? Especially when we're going to be a bottom of the league anyway. Even if Ottawa did need him that's WAY too much.


I said some trades would be unrealistic...... Srsly, do people not pay attention to anything these days?
11 juin 2019 à 13 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,384
Mentions "j'aime": 602
GMJB says welcome to Buffalo Matt...... order your wings hot with blue cheese NO ranch!
11 juin 2019 à 13 h 56
#4
GloryDaysAreBack
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,095
Mentions "j'aime": 469
I just don't think you can make 6 trades in the off-season, GMing irl just isn't as quick and easy as on nhl '19. I'd drop Duclair and Formenton from the Quick trade. But Ottawa also has Nilsson and Andy so I am not sure if it's goaltending they're hurting for. Quick probably wants to play for a contender too. Calgary, Columbus and possibly Florida aren't bad ideas. Calgary could give you Rittich in return I imagine.
11 juin 2019 à 13 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
Quoting: ChicagoGM
I said some trades would be unrealistic...... Srsly, do people not pay attention to anything these days?


What's the point then?
F50marco a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2019 à 14 h 0
#6
Démarrer sujet
ChicagoGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 61
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: BlastnyFromThePastny
I just don't think you can make 6 trades in the off-season, GMing irl just isn't as quick and easy as on nhl '19. I'd drop Duclair and Formenton from the Quick trade. But Ottawa also has Nilsson and Andy so I am not sure if it's goaltending they're hurting for. Quick probably wants to play for a contender too. Calgary, Columbus and possibly Florida aren't bad ideas. Calgary could give you Rittich in return I imagine.


Columbus probably would be a good option if Bob leaves to FA. Florida, IMO, won't be a contender unless they get Panarin and a good goalie (Quick, like u said, or Bob) in FA. Smith seemed pretty good at times in the playoffs for Calgary, but they could use a more reliable goalie, so you're right, Calgary might be a good option.
BlastnyFromThePastny a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2019 à 14 h 1
#7
Démarrer sujet
ChicagoGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 61
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
What's the point then?


To have fun? Is that not a thing I'm allowed to do?
11 juin 2019 à 14 h 4
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,441
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Arizona declines both trades, cant take on that much cap and just generally doesnt make sense. Martinez gets a late first at most, not a top 15 pick from a team going to rebuild. Again the quick trade makes 0 sense, rebuilding team like that wouldnt give up that many assets for an aging goalie. Carter trade seems decent, I think a smarter way to trade him would just be to retain salary and get actual value rather than giving up a 2nd with him, Carter at 2.6 mill has legitimate value and the kings can afford to eat a lot of cap, (you can do the same thing with the other players you gave up as well)
ChicagoGM a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2019 à 14 h 7
#9
Démarrer sujet
ChicagoGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 61
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: shmoeman
Arizona declines both trades, cant take on that much cap and just generally doesnt make sense. Martinez gets a late first at most, not a top 15 pick from a team going to rebuild. Again the quick trade makes 0 sense, rebuilding team like that wouldnt give up that many assets for an aging goalie. Carter trade seems decent, I think a smarter way to trade him would just be to retain salary and get actual value rather than giving up a 2nd with him, Carter at 2.6 mill has legitimate value and the kings can afford to eat a lot of cap, (you can do the same thing with the other players you gave up as well)


See, I appreciate constructive criticism like this.
11 juin 2019 à 14 h 12
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 6,692
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
What's the point then?


Agreed 100%.

If the goal is to have fun and make trades all willy nilly, than just don't post it to the forum. The forum is for discussion, and simply saying "its just for fun" doesn't exclude you from criticism.

Not sure if its unrealistic? Here we'll tell you!
11 juin 2019 à 14 h 18
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
Quoting: ChicagoGM
To have fun? Is that not a thing I'm allowed to do?


Fair enough. I personally think the discussion is what makes this fun, but to each their own
ChicagoGM a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2019 à 14 h 26
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,316
Mentions "j'aime": 2,212
As a Kings fans, here are my problems with this:

Neither of the Arizona trades make sense for either team. The first one (DB+Anderson+Red) is a terrible trade for LA if it made sense. Anderson is a prospect the Kings would like to see develop in Ontario after captaining the WJ USA team. He's been a very pleasant surprise. Brown is coming off of 2 50+ point seasons in a row, and is the beating heart and soul of the Kings team. Those two aren't going to Arizona for some 25 point guy and a 5th round pick, that's terrible.

Blake Lizotte hasn't shown enough at the NHL/prospect level to be worth much, and Kovalchuk doesn't make sense for Arizona in terms of their rebuild/age group.

Martinez, as much as I'd like him to be, isn't worth a 1st rounder, due to his age. Probably a 2nd and a B+ prospect.

I don't know enough about the Ottawa prospects to even speculate on that, but I've NEVER been impressed with Anthony Duclair. I imagine there's a reason he's jumped around as much as he has. Besides, the Kings will look to get picks for Quick.

Carter is coming off of a terrible year where he had to rehab a tendon-tear. Two years ago, he led the team in points (2016-2017). My assumption is they hold onto him for this year, hoping he regains his health/scoring touch. He'll be looked at as a piece to maybe move at the deadline to a team that needs experience and scoring. Maybe Carolina? Florida? Hopefully somewhere on the East Coast.

Undervaluing Matt Luff a bit. He just put up 10+ goals as a rookie who didn't play for over half the season. I'd imagine he's worth a 2nd rounder.
ChicagoGM a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage