SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retooling - moves with TOR MIN EDM WSH BUF

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2019-20 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 6 juin 2019
Publié: 6 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Goldobin goes to KHL...
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 000 000 $
11 600 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
66 500 000 $
34 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Timashov, Dmytro
  2. Zaitsev, Nikita
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (1 335 000 $ retained)
2.
VAN
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Pouliot, Derrick [Droits de RFA]
  2. Virtanen, Jake
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Beagle, Jay (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Gaunce, Brendan [Droits de RFA]
4.
5.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
6.
EDM
  1. Hutton, Ben [Droits de RFA]
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de WSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de VAN
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 000 000 $74 870 213 $0 $4 550 000 $8 129 787 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 4
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 325 000 $2 325 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,304
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
I haven't even looked at this yet, but if it involves Lucic in any way...
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 34
#2
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Wqrrior
I haven't even looked at this yet, but if it involves Lucic in any way...


It does
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,304
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
Quoting: BurgerBoss
It does


Can a Vancouver AGM even exist anymore without that transaction...
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 39
#4
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Think Toronto would decline that offer.
oneX a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 39
#5
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Wqrrior
Can a Vancouver AGM even exist anymore without that transaction...


Yes. Actually I have an idea... I'm going to change it.
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 41
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,304
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Yes. Actually I have an idea... I'm going to change it.


I tried that trade in a AGM of my own a few weeks ago, and buffalo fans lost it on me. Even though I think Sutter works perfectly there, they just won't budge on it. I think that trade is legitimate though. Maybe add a 4th or 5th in Buffalo's direction.
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 43
#7
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Wqrrior
I tried that trade in a AGM of my own a few weeks ago, and buffalo fans lost it on me. Even though I think Sutter works perfectly there, they just won't budge on it. I think that trade is legitimate though. Maybe add a 4th or 5th in Buffalo's direction.


Hold up, what exactly was the move you tried?
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 44
#8
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Jamiepo
Think Toronto would decline that offer.


Any reasons?
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 48
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,304
Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Hold up, what exactly was the move you tried?


Sutter + Pouliot and a third for Scandella - I think.
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 51
#10
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Wqrrior
Sutter + Pouliot and a third for Scandella - I think.


Well that's an overpayment. But whatever. Some BUF fans seem to like their current pace and the draft lottery being the highlight of their every season lol.
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 54
#11
JtPunk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 272
Mentions "j'aime": 33
I don't see how this helps vancouver in any way
6 juin 2019 à 21 h 56
#12
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Jtpunk77
I don't see how this helps vancouver in any way


Well it's a retooling process. Gives them a couple of assets for now and also strengthens their future.
6 juin 2019 à 22 h 7
#13
JtPunk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 272
Mentions "j'aime": 33
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Well it's a retooling process. Gives them a couple of assets for now and also strengthens their future.


It really doesn't help the future. It adds age to the group and very little picks in retuen while giving up a 22 year old and 2 26 year olds while adding a 29, 27 and a 29 year old. That doesn't help the future.
6 juin 2019 à 22 h 9
#14
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Jtpunk77
It really doesn't help the future. It adds age to the group and very little picks in retuen while giving up a 22 year old and 2 26 year olds while adding a 29, 27 and a 29 year old. That doesn't help the future.


Yes and no. Those assets are signed long-term. In a longer scale, they're going to help your future as well as they're helping now. I'd say that the team in this form is closer to being a playoff team than what it was this year.
6 juin 2019 à 22 h 30
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,766
Mentions "j'aime": 2,619
Quoting: Jamiepo
Think Toronto would decline that offer.


And Tanev is injury prone.
6 juin 2019 à 22 h 51
#16
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Any reasons?


Tanev is just too injury prone, paying a 2nd 3rd and Timashov to get pretty much the same player with no offensive side who will probably play half a season doesn’t really help our cap situation if you have to replace him.

I get the idea of replacing zaitsev and getting out of his term. It’s not a horrible idea.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2019 à 22 h 55
#17
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Jamiepo
Tanev is just too injury prone, paying a 2nd 3rd and Timashov to get pretty much the same player with no offensive side who will probably play half a season doesn’t really help our cap situation if you have to replace him.

I get the idea of replacing zaitsev and getting out of his term. It’s not a horrible idea.


Fair enough. What should VAN add to make it acceptable?
6 juin 2019 à 23 h 2
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,031
Mentions "j'aime": 280
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Any reasons?


I'm guessing primarily due to Tanev's injury history. Even if Tanev is a top 4 defender we wouldn't get him for almost half the season, inluding the playoffs.

Quoting: Jamiepo
Think Toronto would decline that offer.


I think it could work. Realisticially I don't expect to get all much for Zaitsev, so it really comes down to what a retained Tanev's value is. 2nd + 3th + Timashov might be a tad high given his injury concerns but I don't think its completely over the top. Maybe make one of the picks conditional on games played in the playoffs.
GenXHockey et justaBoss a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2019 à 23 h 12
#19
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Fair enough. What should VAN add to make it acceptable?


That’s a tough one. I just don’t see dubas being in on tanev.

If there were any Dman from the Nucks coming back it would be stecher. We would add kapanen they would add maybe a 2nd or a prospect.

If I were going to deal zaitsev I would just take a 4th or a 5th back. Maybe just 1 for 1 with Biega.
6 juin 2019 à 23 h 13
#20
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: MacerV
I'm guessing primarily due to Tanev's injury history. Even if Tanev is a top 4 defender we wouldn't get him for almost half the season, inluding the playoffs.



I think it could work. Realisticially I don't expect to get all much for Zaitsev, so it really comes down to what a retained Tanev's value is. 2nd + 3th + Timashov might be a tad high given his injury concerns but I don't think its completely over the top. Maybe make one of the picks conditional on games played in the playoffs.


The conditional pick is actually a good idea.
6 juin 2019 à 23 h 14
#21
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Jamiepo
That’s a tough one. I just don’t see dubas being in on tanev.

If there were any Dman from the Nucks coming back it would be stecher. We would add kapanen they would add maybe a 2nd or a prospect.

If I were going to deal zaitsev I would just take a 4th or a 5th back. Maybe just 1 for 1 with Biega.


Honestly I can't see teams taking Zaitsev without shedding some cap themselves, cuz that contract is relatively big and not exactly a positive one for teams to have. He should be used as a part for a bigger trade as a piece to even out the cap. That's how you'd get the most value out of him, anyway.
6 juin 2019 à 23 h 24
#22
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,156
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: BurgerBoss
Honestly I can't see teams taking Zaitsev without shedding some cap themselves, cuz that contract is relatively big and not exactly a positive one for teams to have. He should be used as a part for a bigger trade as a piece to even out the cap. That's how you'd get the most value out of him, anyway.


Yup, I agree. Vancouver has no need to balance out the cap. By the time they are ready to spend to the cap the contract on zaitsev looks better.

I saw another trade where we take spooner back. Now that is horrible. Your trade isn’t bad just don’t see dubas jumping at it. I could certainly be wrong though.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2019 à 23 h 26
#23
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Jamiepo
Yup, I agree. Vancouver has no need to balance out the cap. By the time they are ready to spend to the cap the contract on zaitsev looks better.

I saw another trade where we take spooner back. Now that is horrible. Your trade isn’t bad just don’t see dubas jumping at it. I could certainly be wrong though.


Lol Spooner. Zaitsev might be overpaid but he's not an AHL player come on...
GMTD a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage