SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lou OSes Marner 11M AAV Sign Karlsson Instead and Fire Babcock

Créé par: handsomeIAN
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 12 mai 2019
Publié: 12 mai 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Threat of an OS from bad old Lou. We spend his money on EK and work a trade with NYI; like Kessel but this time TO is on the winning end.
Also, fire Babcock.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2700 000 $
3700 000 $
2925 000 $
3800 000 $
3700 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 740 000 $
22 260 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
710 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Pulock, Ryan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 000 000 $78 769 699 $0 $215 000 $4 230 301 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 740 000 $3 740 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 260 000 $2 260 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 650 000 $4 650 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 41
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Why would Ottawa do that trade? I'd rather wait for the offer sheet, instead of make a trade you don't like. Rather hold the long term cap space instead of spending it Karlsson.
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 43
#2
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,155
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: palhal
Why would Ottawa do that trade? I'd rather wait for the offer sheet, instead of make a trade you don't like. Rather hold the long term cap space instead of spending it Karlsson.


To add to this (which I also agree with)...

For what seems like the Millionth time I’ve had to point this out... Karlsson will be signed by another team long before a signed sheet comes in on marner.

The leafs will not spend his cap money before that sheet arrives.
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 48
#3
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: palhal
Why would Ottawa do that trade? I'd rather wait for the offer sheet, instead of make a trade you don't like. Rather hold the long term cap space instead of spending it Karlsson.


Ottawa would do this because their owner is cheap and would not want to be paying someone to not play. Marleau would at least slot into the linup every night.
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 51
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: jcash08
Ottawa would do this because their owner is cheap and would not want to be paying someone to not play. Marleau would at least slot into the linup every night.


C'mon. That's ridiculous. Do you really think Marleau is going to waive his NMC to Ottawa? Isn't McArthur's contract insured, covered by insurance?
dca919 a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 52
#5
Islanders Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 7,820
Mentions "j'aime": 2,758
Why would the Isles make that trade? Just offersheet and give up the compensation.
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 56
#6
BootBoi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,276
Mentions "j'aime": 365
Marner+Kadri+Zaitsev
4
Kessel+Matta+1st round 2019..-~
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 56
#7
BootBoi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,276
Mentions "j'aime": 365
Muzzin back to L.A.
4 Phaneuf..-~
blowing_the_zone a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 14 h 59
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,132
Mentions "j'aime": 1,540
Quoting: BootBoi
Muzzin back to L.A.
4 Phaneuf..-~


Lol
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 1
#9
BootBoi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,276
Mentions "j'aime": 365
Kapanen 4 Clarkson..-~
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 3
#10
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: palhal
C'mon. That's ridiculous. Do you really think Marleau is going to waive his NMC to Ottawa? Isn't McArthur's contract insured, covered by insurance?


I didn't say anything about his NMC that's a different story.

But it is the same reason Toronto had the Nathan Horton for Clarkson trade with Columbus, but Clarkson got injured shortly after and it didn't pan out the way Columbus would have liked.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 11
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: jcash08
I didn't say anything about his NMC that's a different story.

But it is the same reason Toronto had the Nathan Horton for Clarkson trade with Columbus, but Clarkson got injured shortly after and it didn't pan out the way Columbus would have liked.


Well, you didn't have to say anything about Marleau's NMC. It's a fact. It's not different story. And certainly if McArthur's salary is insured, it's not a cash payout by the owner.
Actually the Clarkson traded turned out perfectly for CBJ. They didn't have to pay out of pocket for the injured Horton, and insurance paid for Clarkson's contract. Clarkson's LTIR gave Columbus space though they certainly miscalculated the value of Karlson and allowed Vegas to claim him in the expansion draft.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 12
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,132
Mentions "j'aime": 1,540
Apparently Babcock isnt going anywhere. Or so Dubas has said...

Although, this is what i think could be going on behind the scenes..

- there is an actual divide between Dubas and Babcock insofar as roster construction, player usage, adaptability etc
- a bet a whole buck that there was a serious review of Babcock at seasons end, and that expectations have been discussed and that the leash has been shorted
- next season could be a step back and its the wrong time to fire Babs and bring in Keefe. If it goes to pots next year it'll be on Babcock and his head will be offered on a platter to the hockey gods and then Keefe comes in. But if Babcock is fired now, and it goes to pots next year (because its looking like it could be a step back kinda of a year regardless of who the coach is), then it'll be on Dubas and his head will be on the platter.. I don't see a young GM putting himself that position so early in his career. I think Dubas is being patient here (if only for self preservation), that Keefe is Dubas's man, and will be the coach of the leafs when the time is right..
slickers a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 24
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Quoting: palhal
C'mon. That's ridiculous. Do you really think Marleau is going to waive his NMC to Ottawa? Isn't McArthur's contract insured, covered by insurance?


yeah the trade itself is moot since zero change he would waive it to go to probably the worst destination in the league right now.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 32
#14
slickers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 5
not sure I agree with all the schematics of this thread, but this is more worthy of reading then some other garbage out there
blowing_the_zone a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 46
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: palhal
C'mon. That's ridiculous. Do you really think Marleau is going to waive his NMC to Ottawa? Isn't McArthur's contract insured, covered by insurance?


80% of the real money is covered by insurance, but the cap hit doesn't count towards their floor. After signing bonuses OTT would end up paying Marleau around the same real money but would save $5M in getting to the cap floor. It's a big real money saving move for Melnyk.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 53
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: joshelkin
Why would the Isles make that trade? Just offersheet and give up the compensation.


Compensation would be 4 1st rounders. It's conceivable that they might prefer a trade and I tried to make the value realistic. When the Leafs traded for Kessel, it was because Toronto was threatening an offer sheet. The Bruins and Leafs decided to go to the table and make a trade instead.
OS compensation is static; teams might mutually look to modify the terms of the exchange and so the obvious solution is a trade.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 55
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: Jamiepo
To add to this (which I also agree with)...

For what seems like the Millionth time I’ve had to point this out... Karlsson will be signed by another team long before a signed sheet comes in on marner.

The leafs will not spend his cap money before that sheet arrives.


The scenario is the threat of an offer sheet resulting in a trade. There's no real value in Lou concealing his intent to OS Marner and as much as I dislike the guy I'd wager that he'd consider it gentlemanly to be upfront about his interest if asked.
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 15 h 59
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: palhal
Why would Ottawa do that trade? I'd rather wait for the offer sheet, instead of make a trade you don't like. Rather hold the long term cap space instead of spending it Karlsson.


There's no scenario where the Leafs should not be spending all their cap space every year (or any team, really). You need to pay attention to the long term outlook, obviously, but if rebuilding you should be weaponizing it every year to acquire assets and if not you should be maxing it out to compete/acquire assets. Held cap space simply expires; it's a waste!
Acquiring the best D in the league on a long term deal, who is a RHD, is maybe the best possible use of cap space for the Leafs right now. The time for them to compete started three seasons ago with Matthews, Marner and Nylander on ELCs, instead, Lou clogged up the cap with half-measures designed to "build character" because he considers hockey teams his own personal doll house and doesn't understand aging curves or the salary cap. So instead, the time to compete is now, while they are still young.
12 mai 2019 à 16 h 4
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,132
Mentions "j'aime": 1,540
Quoting: slickers
not sure I agree with all the schematics of this thread, but this is more worthy of reading then some other garbage out there


That is precisely why I come to Capfriendly .. to get my daily dose of hockey info and avoid the media knuckleheads
12 mai 2019 à 16 h 4
#20
Barzal4208
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 124
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: handsomeIAN
Compensation would be 4 1st rounders. It's conceivable that they might prefer a trade and I tried to make the value realistic. When the Leafs traded for Kessel, it was because Toronto was threatening an offer sheet. The Bruins and Leafs decided to go to the table and make a trade instead.
OS compensation is static; teams might mutually look to modify the terms of the exchange and so the obvious solution is a trade.


Perhaps, but it isnt going to include Pulock or Dobson. Take Leddy to lessen the draft pick haul or otherwise we just soon lose the drat picks
12 mai 2019 à 16 h 20
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,132
Mentions "j'aime": 1,540
Quoting: handsomeIAN
There's no scenario where the Leafs should not be spending all their cap space every year (or any team, really). You need to pay attention to the long term outlook, obviously, but if rebuilding you should be weaponizing it every year to acquire assets and if not you should be maxing it out to compete/acquire assets. Held cap space simply expires; it's a waste!
Acquiring the best D in the league on a long term deal, who is a RHD, is maybe the best possible use of cap space for the Leafs right now. The time for them to compete started three seasons ago with Matthews, Marner and Nylander on ELCs, instead, Lou clogged up the cap with half-measures designed to "build character" because he considers hockey teams his own personal doll house and doesn't understand aging curves or the salary cap. So instead, the time to compete is now, while they are still young.


I agree with a whole lot of this, especially your rationale on how to manage the cap and why a team should manage it that way.

Personally, I'm not sold on EK if only because I think his history with injuries has a taken a greater toll than what's being let on. I get it that he's still putting up points and playing well but there's times when you watch skate that something seems wrong.. could be something, could be nothing, it could just be me.

I think Lou gets a bad rap sometimes. Some of that is deserved and some not. He did alot of good in leafland in the time he was here, not the least if which was establishing order and credibility with the organization. We were a joke before he got here.. a not a funny one.

The one thing that baffles me with Lou is the Marleau contract. Given your rationale for how to manage the cap, and my belief that Marleau's 3 yr contract was set up as a 2 yr deal, then why didnt Lou just pay the 9M + over 2 years to give him his 18.75 M instead of paying that amount over 3 years?

Maybe my take has been wrong the whole time and Marleau always had every intention of playing the third year. And if that is true, then signing Marleau to that third year was a magor fail on Lou. If Marleau is around next season it really does put the leafs in a pickle.. that would be on Lou.
12 mai 2019 à 16 h 22
#22
Islanders Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 7,820
Mentions "j'aime": 2,758
Quoting: handsomeIAN
Compensation would be 4 1st rounders. It's conceivable that they might prefer a trade and I tried to make the value realistic. When the Leafs traded for Kessel, it was because Toronto was threatening an offer sheet. The Bruins and Leafs decided to go to the table and make a trade instead.
OS compensation is static; teams might mutually look to modify the terms of the exchange and so the obvious solution is a trade.


Maybe they reach a middle ground in this scenario, but it wouldn't include Pulock/Dobson/Wilde. I'd rather keep Pulock, not accept a cap dump in Zaitsev, and just pay the 4 firsts if these are the two options
12 mai 2019 à 16 h 29
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
just lame arguments here. OS. FIrst off like no team OS players because of the unwritten rule.
The second is, any offer sheet that would come in is probably going to come in from a winning team. Bravo in getting 4 late round 1st round picks. I'm sure that will really bring you back the type of quality you are losing in Marner. Hell I would be more than happy to give you the penguins next 4 first rounders for Marner. You'll be picking 25+ every year for the next 4 years. Good luck with that.
Third, never does the team trading a really good player get the value back in a trade. It's why they lost on the Kessel trade. It's why Ottawa lost on the Stone, Hoffman, and Karlsson trades. It's why Chicago lost on the Panarin trade. We can go on here but honestly I'm sure you get the point by now.
Just extremely ignorant arguments here. The best thing TO can do is sign Marner. He'll cost 11.6 or so. It's worth it.
12 mai 2019 à 16 h 50
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,132
Mentions "j'aime": 1,540
Quoting: pharrow
just lame arguments here. OS. FIrst off like no team OS players because of the unwritten rule.
The second is, any offer sheet that would come in is probably going to come in from a winning team. Bravo in getting 4 late round 1st round picks. I'm sure that will really bring you back the type of quality you are losing in Marner. Hell I would be more than happy to give you the penguins next 4 first rounders for Marner. You'll be picking 25+ every year for the next 4 years. Good luck with that.
Third, never does the team trading a really good player get the value back in a trade. It's why they lost on the Kessel trade. It's why Ottawa lost on the Stone, Hoffman, and Karlsson trades. It's why Chicago lost on the Panarin trade. We can go on here but honestly I'm sure you get the point by now.
Just extremely ignorant arguments here. The best thing TO can do is sign Marner. He'll cost 11.6 or so. It's worth it.


If the Penguins offered up 4 firsts I hope the leafs would take it and run. We now have 7 1st round picks over the next 4 years to spend like drunken sailors if we choose to .. and package those 1sts up in trades to rebalance our cap and address roster needs, all while not putting much stress on our draft and develop model.

But riddle me this Pharrow.. if the Pens gave up the 4 1sts, what do they need to do to make their cap work and the roster better? And how would that make the pens a better team?

Not saying it can't be done, just that I'd actually like to see it so I can better understand how Marner is that valuable to team success, and how keeping him and giving him whatever he wants is better than what I can construct with 4 firsts and Marners cap space in this fake gm game..
gregb569 a aimé ceci.
12 mai 2019 à 18 h 49
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 35
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: bkt42bkt42
Perhaps, but it isnt going to include Pulock or Dobson. Take Leddy to lessen the draft pick haul or otherwise we just soon lose the drat picks


They're getting Mitch Marner here, a star that everyone seems to think should be paid $11M. I don't think that Pulock and a 4th is a shocking return in the place of two 1sts. Pulock is good but the Isles seemkind of half-hearted about him, I don't know. He should probably be playing more than every other D on the PP and EV STR and he isn't so clearly they don't understand what they have in him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage