SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Vancouver Canucks signed Quintin Hughes (3 Years / $1,604,167 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


10 mars 2019 à 18 h 48
#1
Quintin Hughes has signed a new contract with the Vancouver Canucks.
Contrat d’entrée
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Jim Benning
Durée: 3 ans
Valeur: 4 812 500 $
Statut à l’échéance du contrat: 10.2(c)
% Cap Info-bulle: 1,15
Contrat signé avec: Logo de Canucks de VancouverCanucks de Vancouver
Date de signature: 10 mars 2019
Source: @CapFriendly

Quinn Hughes a signé un contrat de 3 ans d'une valeur de 4 812 500 $ avec les Canucks de Vancouver, le 10 mars 2019. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 916 667 $.

SAISONClauseCap hitInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBonis de performanceInfo-bulleBonis de signatureInfo-bulleSalaire de baseInfo-bulleSalaire totalInfo-bulleSalaire mineuresInfo-bulle
2018-19916 667 $1 604 167 $362 500 $92 500 $807 500 $900 000 $70 000 $
2019-20916 667 $1 604 167 $850 000 $92 500 $832 500 $925 000 $70 000 $
2020-21916 667 $1 604 167 $850 000 $92 500 $832 500 $925 000 $70 000 $
TOTAL2 750 001 $4 812 501 $2 062 500 $277 500 $2 472 500 $2 750 000 $210 000 $
Offre qualificativeInfo-bulle: 874 125 $
10 mars 2019 à 18 h 57
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 345
Mentions "j'aime": 234
Modifié 11 mars 2019 à 13 h 1
Story is he signed on condition of burning off a year of his ELC. Otherwise he would return to college next year. Not crazy about the strategy to willingly a burn off a year of an ELC, esp with the way RFA salaries have escalated in the past year. He has 3 more years til he would become an UFA and I doubt he would hold out that long. Would he stay out of NHL and risk injury for next season (and 2 more after) regardless? Unlikely. GMs in the NHL need to start showing more backbone with players with no leverage. ??‍♀️
MoreOfAnIslesGuy a aimé ceci.
10 mars 2019 à 19 h 8
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 112
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Quoting: rebecca
Story is he signed on condition of burning off a year of his ELC. Otherwise he would return to college next year. Not crazy about the strategy to willingly a burn off a year of an ELC, esp with the way RDA salaries have escalated in the past year. He has 3 more years til he would become an UFA and I doubt he would hold out that long. Would he stay out of NHL and risk injury for next season (and 2 more after) regardless? Unlikely. GMs in the NHL need to start showing more backbone with players with no leverage. ??‍♀️


I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he needs to play in at least 10 games in order to burn a year off of his ELC, otherwise it would slide. With only 13 games left, one would hope that management would give him a 9 game try-out and allow his contract to slide and therefore, begin next year.
10 mars 2019 à 19 h 9
#4
xd
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 236
Mentions "j'aime": 209
If he plays his 9 games he burns a year on his ELC and (I think) he’s eligible for Seattle Expansion Draft.
10 mars 2019 à 19 h 17
#5
SabresFan1996
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 707
Mentions "j'aime": 211
With college players that sign in season the first year of the contract is burned when the play 1 game for example Mittelstadt only played 6 games last year and burned a year playing one game this year was the second of his ELC
MeLeenyk_Out et rebecca a aimé ceci.
10 mars 2019 à 20 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,565
Mentions "j'aime": 865
916k instead of 925k. Sounds like a good deal to me.
Jerry et MountRoyal514 a aimé ceci.
11 mars 2019 à 9 h 16
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,717
Mentions "j'aime": 543
Quoting: Club_de_Hockey_le_Canadien
916k instead of 925k. Sounds like a good deal to me.


916K for 2 full seasons (plus a few games this year).

vs

925K for 3 full seasons.

------------------------------

I'll take option 2 please.

But my ideal option would be 895K for 3 full seasons (2020-21 + 2021-22 + 2022-23) with one more year of college development.

That'll give him 2 extra years on his ELC at a time when Vancouver might be good enough to compete (and he'll be good enough to help).
11 mars 2019 à 9 h 44
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,565
Mentions "j'aime": 865
Quoting: drewjenks
916K for 2 full seasons (plus a few games this year).

vs

925K for 3 full seasons.

------------------------------

I'll take option 2 please.

But my ideal option would be 895K for 3 full seasons (2020-21 + 2021-22 + 2022-23) with one more year of college development.

That'll give him 2 extra years on his ELC at a time when Vancouver might be good enough to compete (and he'll be good enough to help).


He will be good enough to help by next year IMO.

Signing him to a contract now means that if they somehow make the playoffs and he's done his NCAA season, they can pull him up for up to 9 games and give him a taste of the NHL, just like the Sabres did with Mittelstadt last year.
11 mars 2019 à 13 h 6
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 345
Mentions "j'aime": 234
Modifié 11 mars 2019 à 13 h 16
Quoting: JakeD
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he needs to play in at least 10 games in order to burn a year off of his ELC, otherwise it would slide. With only 13 games left, one would hope that management would give him a 9 game try-out and allow his contract to slide and therefore, begin next year.


Nope, despite the likes, you’re incorrect. See Mittelstadt, Casey; Gaudreau, Johnny for a couple examples. Gaudreau played just 1 game and a year was burned off. Same will happen for Hughes. It’s an exception to the 10-game rule as @SabresFan1996 noted above.

The story is Hughes would only sign if a year is burned off & he becomes an RFA come 2021. I’m not sure about his eligibility for the expansion draft however, a concern raised by @HockeyWise, but if it’s tied to the same criteria then he could be considered eligible with 3 pro years under his belt by the time of the 21 draft. Not like Vancouver has anyone on defence they’d probably want to really hold onto by that point.

It’s reasons like this why I was the only one, it seems, who voted “no” to this contract! What the hey guys? Better to wait 15 months til he’s played 3 years in college and push back his RFA date to 2023. Or trade him if the little brat won’t sign.
11 mars 2019 à 15 h 14
#10
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,830
Mentions "j'aime": 3,865
Quinton*
BlueSeeker a aimé ceci.
11 mars 2019 à 15 h 23
#11
Follow capfriendly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 1336
Messages: 2,660
Mentions "j'aime": 1,914
Quoting: rebecca
Story is he signed on condition of burning off a year of his ELC. Otherwise he would return to college next year. Not crazy about the strategy to willingly a burn off a year of an ELC, esp with the way RFA salaries have escalated in the past year. He has 3 more years til he would become an UFA and I doubt he would hold out that long. Would he stay out of NHL and risk injury for next season (and 2 more after) regardless? Unlikely. GMs in the NHL need to start showing more backbone with players with no leverage. ??‍♀️


Quoting: JakeD
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he needs to play in at least 10 games in order to burn a year off of his ELC, otherwise it would slide. With only 13 games left, one would hope that management would give him a 9 game try-out and allow his contract to slide and therefore, begin next year.


Quoting: HockeyWise
If he plays his 9 games he burns a year on his ELC and (I think) he’s eligible for Seattle Expansion Draft.


His entry-level signing age is 20, and therefore he is ineligible for a slide. If you look on his player page you will notice the blue slide arrow is missing: https://www.capfriendly.com/players/quintin-hughes
rebecca et tatatavares a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage