SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sam Bennett for Chris Tierney

Créé par: gavinray
Équipe: 2019-20 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 3 mars 2019
Publié: 3 mars 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The spezza signing was for fun and to hit the cap floor
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
23 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
1900 000 $
2900 000 $
14 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
17 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
    Bennett, Sam
    3rd line C - 30 pt pace
    High potential
    Helps Ottawa tank
    CGY
    1. Tierney, Chris
    Détails additionnels:
    2nd line C - 50 pt pace
    Medium potential
    Improves Calgary's lineup
    2.
    OTT
      draft pick
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Enfoui
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de DAL
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de STL
      Logo de OTT
      2021
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      2022
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de OTT
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2279 500 000 $50 949 999 $0 $3 645 000 $28 550 001 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
      AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
      AG
      RFA - 3
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      AG, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      759 167 $759 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      900 000 $900 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance360 000 $$360K)
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      900 000 $900 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
      DG/DD, AG
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      755 000 $755 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      725 000 $725 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      900 000 $900 000 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      4 650 000 $4 650 000 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      3 mars 2019 à 11 h 38
      #1
      CGY
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2015
      Messages: 5,544
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
      That’s an interesting proposal.

      I think the Flames do need a better 3rd like centre. I’m not huge on Jankowski.

      However, I think the Flames like Bennett still as he is one of the few players they have that can play with an edge.

      It’s a tough call though. If it was for Jankowski though it would be a no brainer for me
      3 mars 2019 à 11 h 47
      #2
      MisstheWhalers
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2019
      Messages: 23,648
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,370
      I like Bennet and Tierney seems to be trending in the right direction so to me this looks like it'd be selling low on Tierney. I just wonder if Tierney' numbers are inflated both in ST and Ottawa by circumstance of linemates/ice time or if he's really that good.
      3 mars 2019 à 11 h 50
      #3
      MisstheWhalers
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2019
      Messages: 23,648
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,370
      Quoting: ItWasIn
      That’s an interesting proposal.

      I think the Flames do need a better 3rd like centre. I’m not huge on Jankowski.

      However, I think the Flames like Bennett still as he is one of the few players they have that can play with an edge.

      It’s a tough call though. If it was for Jankowski though it would be a no brainer for me


      From the Flames games I've watched this season Jankowski and Bennett both play with an edge and Bennett seems like he's gonna be the perfect 3C to me, that Hathaway guy plays with an edge too.
      With those three in your bottom 6 I think Calgary is well built for a long playoff run.
      3 mars 2019 à 12 h 7
      #4
      Phil Swift
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2018
      Messages: 594
      Mentions "j'aime": 104
      Tierney is not a 2C lmao. he's a 2C on the Sens because they have no better options. . & would be a 3rd C on the flames behind Monahan & Backlund. flames might wanna keep Bennett based off his grit & being a high draft pick, & the fact that he's younger an still has more potential
      3 mars 2019 à 15 h 51
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      gavinray
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 2,167
      Mentions "j'aime": 561
      Quoting: MisstheWhalers
      I like Bennet and Tierney seems to be trending in the right direction so to me this looks like it'd be selling low on Tierney. I just wonder if Tierney' numbers are inflated both in ST and Ottawa by circumstance of linemates/ice time or if he's really that good.

      Quoting: Yinz3r
      Tierney is not a 2C lmao. he's a 2C on the Sens because they have no better options. . & would be a 3rd C on the flames behind Monahan & Backlund. flames might wanna keep Bennett based off his grit & being a high draft pick, & the fact that he's younger an still has more potential


      Tierney hasn't benefitted from others, he's barely had the chance to play with Dzingel, Duchene or Stone because Duchene and White have been our top 2 Cs for the majority of the season.
      Tierney was a 3C for us, was saddled with pretty bad players and is still on pace for over 50 points (which is 2C production).
      The guy is only 24 years old and has high hockey IQ. Just watch him play. I think it would be a great deal for Calgary to upgrade to a 45-50pt 3C.
      3 mars 2019 à 15 h 55
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      gavinray
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2015
      Messages: 2,167
      Mentions "j'aime": 561
      Quoting: Yinz3r
      Tierney is not a 2C lmao. he's a 2C on the Sens because they have no better options. . & would be a 3rd C on the flames behind Monahan & Backlund. flames might wanna keep Bennett based off his grit & being a high draft pick, & the fact that he's younger an still has more potential


      Tierney has more points than Backlund btw. So how is Backlund a 2C but Tierney isn't?
      3 mars 2019 à 16 h 1
      #7
      MisstheWhalers
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2019
      Messages: 23,648
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,370
      Quoting: gavinray
      Tierney hasn't benefitted from others, he's barely had the chance to play with Dzingel, Duchene or Stone because Duchene and White have been our top 2 Cs for the majority of the season.
      Tierney was a 3C for us, was saddled with pretty bad players and is still on pace for over 50 points (which is 2C production).
      The guy is only 24 years old and has high hockey IQ. Just watch him play. I think it would be a great deal for Calgary to upgrade to a 45-50pt 3C.


      Thanks for the info, was hoping my team would've traded for him. I think GM's that were looking for a center were pretty dumb to not try to pry Tierney from Dorian, bet he could've been had for a fairly reasonable price and he would've provided great value.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage